Reply to Thread New Thread |
03-23-2011, 12:48 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
03-23-2011, 01:00 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
03-23-2011, 01:58 AM | #3 |
|
When evil doers do a bad thing and use corporate media to distract the public attention from the real culprits , two things happen. 1. the sheeples ( sheep like people ) believe what the corporate media says. 2. smart people try to dig and find out the real truth . Then they try to warn the sheeples about the real culprits. Now the real culprits need to convince the sheeples that they should not believe any info coming from the truth-seekkers. So, these evil doers hire some sell-outs and promote a fake conspiracy which mix up the truth with some laughable and disgusting elements in such a way that the truth-seekers can be discredited. For more on this , check this link ################ http://www.collativelearning.com/con...0contents.html HOW TO MAKE SENSE OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES The truth of the matter is that some conspiracy theories are true and some are false. There are some contexts in which the public are forced to choose between two or more conspiracy theories, with no middle ground alternative. For example, the alternative to the conspiracy theory of holocaust denial is to believe in the conspiracy theory of Nazi concentration camps and mass extermination. They’re both conspiracy theories. On September 11th 2001, a pre-planned plane hi-jack occurred in New York, which caused mass death and destruction. Whether you believe that attack was carried out by Islamist extremists, the CIA, UFOs or Zionists … whichever view you take, you are choosing to believe in a conspiracy theory. It is near enough impossible for any adult not to be a conspiracy theorist because conspiracies do happen on both the small and large scale, and every conspiracy theory must be judged on its own merit rather than a blanket assumption of “true” or “false” being applied to all conspiracy theories. |
|
03-23-2011, 09:12 AM | #4 |
|
Although the term itself is neutral and only describes a claim with regards to a conspiracy, the term is now associated with the negative connotations your decribe, probably because most conspiracy theories are wack |
|
03-23-2011, 09:29 AM | #5 |
|
please tell me your understanding of the events sorrounding 9/11. which theory do you think is the conspiracy theory? the theory that the US government did it or the official theory that al-qaeda did it? or is it something completely different? |
|
03-23-2011, 09:48 AM | #6 |
|
9/11 is an event that occured as a result of CIA planning, which was then taken as an excuse to invade Afghanistan (after blaming bin Laden) As I said before, most conspiracy theories are wack (like illuminati) but not all- sometimes people do genuinely conspire towards an end and they leave behind clues (unintentionally) as in the case of 9/11. There is abundant proof that 9/11 was an inside job and I don't mean some random websites wriiten by even more random people (which is normally the 'proof' someone points to when they want to prove illuminati exist ) You do realise one of the most popular conspiracy theories in the world claims that the royal family are lizard aliens, right? |
|
03-23-2011, 10:10 AM | #7 |
|
and according to yourself, the official 9/11 story is a conspiracy as you feel there is proof to suggest this. lizards........the same way that not all mainstream theories are true, not all conspiracy theories are true either. |
|
03-23-2011, 10:11 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
03-23-2011, 10:32 AM | #9 |
|
so according to the official consensus, you are a conspiracy theorist. Yes, according to mainstream consensus, I am a conspiracy theoriest. As I explained before, conspiracy theory is a neautral term that is used with negative connotations now (I also use it in this way, when people believe something which has little or no proof) The reason I mentioned the lizard theory is to show that most theories are wack, since one of the main conspiracy theories that manifests itself on the internet itself is wack. |
|
03-23-2011, 10:36 AM | #10 |
|
|
|
03-29-2011, 07:47 PM | #11 |
|
When i said someone had dome research into this, i meant that research had been undertaken to find the most popular conspiracy theories out there. The lizard story is one of them, and is outlined in the works of david icke, the crazy mushrik. The theory itself is kufr and is somewhat similar to scientology although there are obvious differences |
|
03-29-2011, 08:59 PM | #12 |
|
Conspiracy theories are developed to provide alternative explanations for nationally traumatic events that are not adequately explained by the official one. Since the official story is seen by some as inadequate, then it implies those who develop and promote the official story are part of a cover up to conceal the truth of the real causation of this event which therefore also implies that they are guilty of some involvement or complicity with the real concealed causation. For example, the official 9/11 story does not explain the implosive collapse of the 47-story WTC7 nor the presence of explosive nanothermite particles and its signature iron-rich microspherules in the WTC dust. (For more info see Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth)
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|