Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Asslamulaikum,
Today morning I was pleased to read the newspaper; to see that the Republic of India has issued a new "Postal Stamp" having Shaykh-ul-Hind Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani. Source: http://epaper.inquilab.com/epaperhom...012&edd=mumbai In my memory this has been the second presense of Deoband on the Postal Stamps, earlier the picture of the institute "Darul-uloom-Deoband India" was issued by the Government. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Asslamulaikum, May be we should seek some answers from Deoband. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
i just want to know which ulama the brother cited when he said it is ok to have a pic which is not recognisable at normal distance. My local Aalim. normally I ask for rulings from ulema who give fatwa of permissible or non-permissible. Not from ulema who think of highest taqwa while giving ruling. I have followed a simple advice from your elders. Look for taqwa when it is for yourselves, look for permissible when it is in others. And in practical life I have seen brothers collapsing, these brothers were hardcore in looking for taqwa in others because they were on taqwaa (why pant below a jubba, why not lungi, why not pajama, why a perforated topi, why a belt in your pant, what about your collar, why no miswak, watching you coming late in fajr etc.). But circumstances changed when they were put to hardships they collapsed and they have to run for cover. Many of them stopped visiting the masjid itself. Because they have to face the people whom they had pricked. Secondly this type of behavior made things easy for the salafees. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Assalamu alaykum so according to your local alim, this stamp is not allowed as the image can be clearly seen at a normal distance. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Fix a stamp on paper of a letter size. keep at a distance of 3 to 4 feet. Not on computer. 3 to 4 feet distance would not be normal distance viewing for the stamp. stamps, as you said, are usually on an envelope, and the normal viewing distance of an envelope is when its in your hands, which would make it a normal viewing distance of 0.5 to 1 foot. even the scanned reproduction can be comfortably seen at a distance of 1 foot. a real stamp would be even easier to see at a distance of 1 foot. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
the pic i posted is a scan of the stamp and is a normal stamp size. due to it being a scan there will have been some loss of quality. yet it can clearly be seen. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
the difference is deterioration of quality. the actual stamp would be even more clear and easier to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Shaikhul Islam Hazrat Moulana Husain Ahmad Madani (Rahmatullahi Alaih)
“I never ever had my photo taken knowingly and voluntarily. That takes place when I am unaware, and I do not consider it permissible. Those who do that [i.e. take other peoples’ pictures] are responsible for their actions.” (Ma’aarif wa Haqaaiq, 380) rulings from other deobandi ulama here http://www.thejamiat.co.za/index.php...tid=34:general |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|