[Nundduedola]

i especially liked this passage...frankly because it contains a gap or pause which seems to emphasize the profundity of it:



...you have primary access to the direct experience of the creator.

and indeed, it was for that purpose that you came into this illusion....

[elektikaka]

dear david,

thanks, with much gratitude, your posting of these weekly "lessons" in the law of one arena- it helps to be reminded regularly that the source of the loo material is still working the plan,and after 20 years, still going strong. carla rueckert is an inspiration to all seekers of truth, a better life, and a happier planet.

i have also found her daily blogs to be a wonderful source of inspiration, especially of late- almost like being able to sit and do coffee with a dear friend, or neighbor, each day. rest assured, that there will be no interuption in the continuity of these sunday sessions on the second sunday in august- it'll just take place many lattitudes to the north.

bob

[Nundduedola]

its funny that song was going through my head for no apparent reason a while ago (a long and winding road...) i like this excerpt:

...if there is one key upon which awakening turns, it is that moment of coming to love yourself enough to feel that you are worthy of being taken seriously by yourself. the culture of your people does not encourage awakening or, upon awakening, the commitment to a rule of life that offers time in every day for silence, prayer and devotion... wow, thanks for sharing that - i'm speachless, (a silent moment).

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

more from carla & the group.

be well, be love.

david

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_1013.aspx
saturday meditation
october 13, 2007

group question: (read by jim) our question tonight, q’uo, has to do with how we, as seekers, can deal with adversity. our third-density illusion has the purpose, it seems, of providing us catalyst and by using this catalyst we hopefully can grow into greater understanding of our place in the universe and of how to be of service. sometimes, though, the catalyst is either too much, or we feel like we’re getting burned out, or it’s boringly repetitive and we’re getting tired of doing the work, or for some reason, we just feel discouraged and could use some words of inspiration, something perhaps other than, “well, remember that you’re all one,” or “persevere, persevere.”

is there some way that you could recommend that we could look at the concept of catalyst that seems to be a bit much and overwhelming as we deal with it in our daily round of activities?

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...1990_0802.aspx
intensive meditation
august 2, 1990
(k channeling)

we greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite creator, whom we serve together with you.

it is, as always, our great privilege to work with you and to share with this group a new seeking. when you are seeking together, you are most congruent, though it may not always seem so to you in your illusion as individuals, and we take great joy in being able to share with this congruency of seeking.

this instrument desires to know when it is being of service and we are aware that each of you has also had this desire or questions. we reiterate to you that what is of importance upon a metaphysical level is the desire to be of service, and the purity of the intent in the offering of the self and the dedication of the self to the work and to the purification of the self for the work.

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla and the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2006_1217.aspx

be well, be love.

david

sunday meditation

december 17, 2006

group question: the question this week, q’uo, has to do with being and learning. we’re wondering just how teaching actually occurs as the result of our desire to teach and our attempting to teach certain subjects or topics. much occurs by the very nature of our being, of who we are and how we are. could you speak to the topic of how teaching and learning really occur?

[Nundduedola]

along the thought stream of consumerism - and this has taken some time to better understand - is the idea of green ray blockages.

its in loo book 2 session 32: "...fear of possession, desire for possession, fear of being possessed, desire to be possessed: these are the distortions which will cause the deactivation of green ray energy transfer..."

to bring this back to the idea of consumerism seems an attitude of materialism such as "if only i had this or that, then i could love and/or be loved..." or alternately, the idea that love is an object that can be bought as can almost anything these day(instead of love as an freely shared activity).

the ra passage may likewise suggest such consumeristic and/or materialistic approaches (as related to fears and desires related to possesions) effectively limits one's progress because time spent upon issues which cause blockage is not necessarily time well spent upon issues related to loving...

this may partially explain the disempowering influence that q'uo suggests.

[Nundduedola]

this seems an amazing passage to me:

...the energy, the information, and the inspiration that you need is close to you. if it is not we who offer it to you, please be assured another source will come to you, for that which you desire always comes to you, one way or another. if you will use this discrimination and listening to what we have to say, it will enable us to speak freely to you without being concerned about the issue of free will. we thank you for this consideration.

you ask this day about teaching and learning, how one teaches and how one learns. that is a question of enormous subtlety.... almost every q'uo reading contains such "free will disclaimers" each with a spin of variety in them. reflecting on this here seems ideas of both teaching by example, and of teaching what one desires to learn.

it may be likely that one of the lessons that q'uo struggles with relates to issues of free will - as if the first distortion is close to the last which is grappled with.

take by metaphor a pet which one acts as guide to and guardian of - there can be a desire to look out for this pet for its best interests because the love for the pet is so immense, or is that some infringement of some sort?

what if the pet is so stupid that it doesn't know what's good for it? here it seems there can be a disparity of "knowing" which is so easy for the guardian, and yet so difficult for the guarded.

so the challenge of the guardian seems to detach in some way alowing the guarded to experience (itself) in ways it desires, bearing the hardship of observing misdirection by the beloved...can you appreciate that tension?

it may be that suggestions of this in a repetitive sense ease the learning of this important lesson, which may be slower and more difficult to learn later in the higher densities.

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla & the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0414.aspx

special meditation

april 14, 2007

jim: the first question from t is: “what exactly is the time lateral of earth? does it indicate an illusion within a more real illusion? or is it like the holo-deck on star trek’s fictional world? then are all the stars and planets except earth all holograms because earth is in the time lateral? or, on the other end, if there was no such thing as a time lateral in the beginning, what would the third-density earth be like?”

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0422.aspx

sunday meditation

april 22, 2007

group question: our question today has to do with catalyst and how we process our catalyst. we are wondering how we could really test our feelings or know our feelings or know when we have worked successfully, and when we have perhaps worked with it on a surface level and then maybe buried some of it that really needs some more attention, and thinking that we’ve gotten it and then we go on and at some point it seems to come around again and we need to work on it again. so, q’uo, please give us some direction as to how we can take a look at what’s happening in our lives with our catalyst, so we know when we are working with it successfully and when there’s really more work to be done because we’ve either ignored it or buried it in some fashion.

[zCLadw3R]

wow! did you all see this in http://www.llresearch.org/transcript.../2007_0414.aspx below from carla and the group????!!! aye-ya-ya! we are already in 4d but with our 3d bodies ...just for the meantime. we are but catepillars in a cocoon waiting to become butterflies.

charran

----------

jim: “evolving to the fourth density seems a distant goal. is there a simple way to measure how close we are to the threshold of the fourth density?”

we are those of q’uo, and are aware of your query, my brother. from the preceding answer, you may perhaps guess that we shall inform you that there is a very easy way to judge as to how close you are to fourth density. you are in fourth density, my friends. you are in third-density bodies and so are not able to see the incredibly beautiful infant fourth-density earth that interpenetrates third density at this time.

however, far below the level of conscious awareness, you are more and more aware of your power, your truth, and your beauty. the thinning of the veil has been occurring for some time, as these energies interpenetrate more and more. at this time there is virtually nothing of third-density energy left. there is just enough energy left for a few more of your years in which entities can make the choices that will place them in a position to be able to graduate from third density to the density of love that is your fourth density.

[Nundduedola]

thank you - what a wonderful "earth day" april 22, reading.
to me this quote stood off the page in that context:

...your culture is a very disempowering culture, in our humble opinion. it seems to be bent upon removing from your mind any thoughts that do not have to do with maintaining the status quo of life as a consumer. however, my friends, you are at heart not simply a consumer. indeed, you are potentially a co-creator and a magical, powerful being, capable of functioning in such a way as to change the true core nature of planet earth, on the metaphysical level.... it seems to point a finger at people's role as consumer,
in a way that one may question the trade offs it imposes.
it seems a catalyst that might foster positive change in
ways congruent with the intent of "earth day."

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla & the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0506.aspx

be well, be love.

david

sunday meditation

may 6, 2007

group question: the bhagavad gita and many other positive spiritual teachings speak of self-control as a beneficial and necessary element of the positive seeker’s path—self-control in the face of temptation and in directing the will for the purpose of spiritual pursuits versus worldly pursuits. yet ra offers an alternative understanding in negating control in favor of acceptance and overall balance. is there a positive use of control? does control play any useful role in the discipline of the personality? can one control, for example, through acceptance, meaning that that which has become accepted is able to be controlled or directed?

[Nundduedola]

i like this passage:

yet always, our first gift is that of loving and being loved, for we feel your love of us also. so love is reflected in love and the creator’s concepts flow from metaphysical instruments such as we into your heart. we hope that you will enjoy our company for we assure you, my sister, we greatly enjoy yours and are privileged to be called to you at any time. and this goes for all who would call upon us or the entities of the confederation in general. by all means, make use of us for we are here for only one reason and that is to interact with you at this time when you are trying to get your spiritual feet under you and to make the difference that you came here to make. and may we say, my sister and all, you cannot fail, you cannot err, because as long as you breathe in and breathe out and love, you are doing what you came to do and you are doing it very well... i like this passage because it reminds me of carla's profound question: where's the love? here, she is answered...

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla & the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcipts...2007_0218.aspx

be well, be love.

david

sunday meditation

february 18, 2007

group question: the question this week has to do with the various religions that we have on planet earth. they all seem to have a center of truth, but each religion also seems to have a number of adherents who interpret it their own way and who become fanatic in one way or another, trying make the religion into a dogma, to say this is the way and the only way. is this a human trait? and how can we really know what is the true path for each of us? it seems like each of us has that spark of the creator in us that recognizes truth and we are more reminded of truth than informed of truth. can q’uo give us some general principles as to how look at the various religions and how to find what is “the way” for us?

[jokilewqs]

this is correct-
http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0218.aspx

the word "transcripts" was mis-spelled in the other one.

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla and the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0519.aspx

be well, be love.

david

special meditation

may 19, 2007

jim: the first question today from n: “the question is about this new spiritual path that i am on. i would like to know how i got where i am in this place in time, why it took me so long to get here, and where i need to go now to move forward to make the most of things i’m learning and to fully awaken my spirituality to be most useful in service to others and in fulfilling my own spiritual needs.”

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

more from carla and the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcipts...2007_0902.aspx
sunday meditation, homecoming 2007

september 2, 2007

group question: the question today, q’uo, has to do with channeling. we have a group of people who would like to learn how to channel in order to be of service to others, starting next year when carla initiates a channeling circle. they have some concerns about the dangers of channeling, about one’s will being affected by a strong channeling source, and about getting holes in one’s aura. are there some spiritual principles which you could share with us that would help those who wish to channel to protect themselves and to be of service to others in this endeavor?

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0908.aspx
saturday meditation
september 8, 2007

group question: the question this week has to do with the role which personality plays in the spiritual development of the seeker. we’d like q’uo to give us an idea of the best way for the seeker to look at the personality, to use it or not to use it, and how to use it. what role does the personality play in the work of the spiritual seeker?

be well, be love.

david

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the correct link to the first article;

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0902.aspx

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla and the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0318.aspx

be well, be love.

david

sunday meditation
march 18, 2007

question from carla: (read by jim) the question today is from carla, and it states: “q’uo, i have been writing a book about confederation principles. it is about how third density works. in discussing these principles, i have found it helpful to offer them as information helpful to playing the ‘game of life.’ it is a sacred game yet it is definitely a game.

“the issue of self-worth and dignity has been much on my mind of late. in a way, one could say that in framing life as a game, i have taken away its dignity and taken it lightly. i do not mean to do so. i believe this game to be most worthy. could you offer me any spiritual principles that may aid me in finding the best way to talk about the worthiness of the game board?”

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla & the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...1989_1105.aspx

be well, be love.

david

sunday meditation

november 5, 1989

group question: the question this evening has to do with joy. what is the function of joy in the evolutionary process in this particular experience and how can we find and utilize joy in our daily round of activities in a way that sustains our growth and service to others?

(carla channeling)

i am q’uo. i greet each of you in the love and in the light of the one infinite creator. how lovely it is to dwell with you at this time in peace and harmony and seeking. we feel most privileged that we are asked to come and share with you our thoughts upon the subject of joy. may we say what a joy it is for us to so share our opinions.

we wish, however, to caution each against looking upon us or any material whatsoever as an infallible authority. we share our opinions. we are not infallible. thusly, if we speak truth that is the truth of your heart, you shall recognize it. if you do not recognize it as if, though hearing it for the first time, it were a memory, then it is not a personal truth and could well be a stumbling block. we would ask you not to keep those things which do not feel resonant with your own path of seeking but we hope that we are able to share with you some things which may help as you move along the dusty road of pilgrimage.

firstly, what we would like to say about joy is that, in its primal state, it has no function. it is. for joy is another expression, and indeed a basic manifestation, of unconditional love. thus, it is of the essence or the beingness of the consciousness of the one infinite creator, which is love.

[clitlyphype]

dear friends,

here's the latest from carla and the group.

http://www.llresearch.org/transcript...2007_0922.aspx

be well, be love.

david

saturday meditation

september 22, 2007

group question: the question tonight is: ra says, “know yourself. accept yourself. become the creator.”[1] we would like to know what is the difference between knowing yourself on the one hand and accepting yourself on the other. could you define these? is there any significance in the placement of self-knowledge before self-acceptance in this statement?