[unatkot]

Hi metaman and enkidu i didn't "belittle" ian lungold, on the other hand as i said it had been a "instructive and inspiring" pitch and he appeared to be a very supportive, funny and wise individual. also i didn't say that what happened historically wasn't correct and consistent with the mayan diary, i noticed carl johan calleman pitch myself in gothenburg... what i mentioned was that pple who come right into this community and site and are sceptical, like whitestar, may naturally feel sceptical concerning the predictions of brian wilcock also more so since ian lungold appears so reliable and once they view this movie, particularly. also ian lungold didn't bring forth the concept that some one has "the complete truth" and that everyone should extend to that....that's what the catholic church did to the mayans actually.... I've perhaps not find out about the trend "other timelines" in davids website but i'll. to a sceptic that appears to be to be always a method to "explain away" that nothing occurred This can be a community where you're suppposed to truly have the to speak the mind, be true and crucial to your personal ideas and emotions, and that's also what ra states you must. as I have told often before on the community I have been brainwashed after with catastrophical cansequences so I am just being true to myself, not thinking something just because i study it or see it on the web. All of this said doesn't suggest i "belittle" divinecosmos and brian wilcock. liliane transiten