Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#2 |
|
NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter is planning to retire at the end of the court's current term.The court has completed hearing oral arguments for the year and will be issuing rulings and opinions until the end of June.
Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October. At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and to return to his native New Hampshire. Now, according to reliable sources he has decided to take the plunge and has informed the White House of his decision. Souter's retirement would give President Obama his first appointment to the high court, and most observers expect that he will appoint a woman. The court currently has one female justice — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is recovering from cancer surgery. Obama was elected with strong support from women. An Obama pick would not likely change the ideological makeup of the court. Souter, though appointed by the first President Bush, generally votes with the more liberal members of the court, a group of four that is in a rather consistent minority. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=103694193 |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
He wasn't the one I was expecting to step down. Nor I. We brought up Souter leaving the bench back in August of last year...Post #5662 http://www.talkabouttennis.com/forum...ter#post332560 Like the decision or not (it is, in actuality, horrible law crafted to reach a necessary result), Souter almost single handedly saved Roe v. Wade. He was a quiet, yet forceful presence on the Court, and he served progressives extremely well. He will be missed. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Souter's desire to retire has been talked about for years. He was always uncomfortable in DC, and long talked about simply wanting to go home to New Hampshire. Fortunately for those of us that were troubled by the right turn the Court was making with Roberts and Alito, he was willing to wait out the 2008 election. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Bill Maher: The G.O.P. says Obama's Supreme Court pick is unacceptable. And they'll let him know why as soon as they find out who it is.
![]() The framework of the forthcoming battle over Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick began to materialize on Sunday, as a range of Republican officials sent out trial-balloon criticisms of a pick that is likely weeks away from being announced. (...) Generally, however, Republicans tried to duck discussion of holding up a Supreme Court nominee in committee or Senate - in the process, spurring speculation that they would do just that. (...) "Well, it's a matter of great concern," said Hatch on ABC's This Week. "If he's saying that he wants to pick people who will take sides, he has also said a judge has to be a person of empathy? What does that mean? Usually that's a code word for an activist judge. But he also said that he's going to select judges on the basis of their personal politics, their personal feelings, their personal preferences. Now, you know, those are all code words for an activist judge who is going to, you know, be partisan on the bench." On the whole, every GOPer who took to the cameras on Sunday granted the president the right to choose someone who was of a liberal judicial mindset. "Elections have consequence," acknowledged former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. But they pledged to put up a fight if the person was not of the requisite intellectual and legal qualifications. "The key thing," added Romney, "and the place we draw the line is this: is a individual who will follow the constitution or the law or is this an individual who believes in making the law? And if it's the latter, I think we should stand up and scream loud and hard." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_195317.html Is Antonin Scalia a figment of my imagination? |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
No he isn't, Ti-Amie.
You know, we try not to lump Republicans together because they're not all the same. But somebody needs to tell their most visible leaders to go somewhere and sit down and be quiet for even a minute because every time they open their mouths, they reveal their hypocrisy and their stupidity. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
LOL! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Orrin Hatch expects the nominee to be named this week. Obama has spoken with him and Olympia Snowe, according to Politico. And Snowe asked Obama to appoint a woman.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22093.html Personally, I'm certain a woman is getting the nod. Anyone for a pool? I'm torn between Sonia Sotomayer and Elena Kagan, but I think he'll go Sotomayer because 1) female, 2) Hispanic, and 3) allready a judge on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, so the Senate has allready approved her for a position on a high court once, making confirmation hearings that much easier. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|