[Stetbrate]

from an email I got.

WRITTEN BY A 21 YEAR OLD FEMALE Wow, this girl has a great plan!

Love the last thing she would do the best.

This was written by a 21 yr old female who gets it. It's her future
she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare
big government state that she's being forced to live in! These
solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco , TX , Nov 18, 2011

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no
cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice
and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul
away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal legations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce
or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair. Your home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox
360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week
or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the
roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we
find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires
and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the
"common good.."

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all
of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self
esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone
else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered
self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at
least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current
system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes,
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest.
You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are
receiving a Gov't welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a
job.

[Vagtlaldo]

[Alkassyinhisk]

Wow, for a young person she really seems to have put some thought into that analysis. Is she running for president? I might vote for her.

[chuecfafresslds]

She could just move to communist China?

[heltduell]

Bosco. That girl had a good upbringing.

[Mypepraipse]

She could just move to communist China?

If you could of posted something any dumber, I just don't know what it could be, because this comment doesn't even make sense in reference to the OP.


Stupid liberals, damn. Dont reproduce, k?

[Dayreive]

If you could of posted something any dumber, I just don't know what it could be, because this comment doesn't even make sense in reference to the OP.


Stupid liberals, damn. Dont reproduce, k?

Everything she would impose would require more govt. employees for implementation and enforcement.

Doling out large staple foods would require govt. run distribution centers scattered all over the cities.

Govt. imposed birth control? seriously?

Who would enforce a strict govt. housing program? Hire a bunch more cops to inspect their homes daily?

The last one is awesome. Let the govt. take your shit and sell it, then put you to work for ... the govt? Talk about massive spending right there.


If you were a real libertarian you would rip her shit apart and just get rid of those programs. Instead you think spending more money on them is the right thing to do?

[ElegeExcest]

Getting a job and paying your fair share requires more Government? Care to clarify that statement?

[MicoSiru]

Another BS post by the King of BS!

I wouldn't believe a single sentence from the OP BS.
Merely another RW regurgitated BS story, hoping to influence when there is no capability of doing so.

[mr.videomen]

HD79, one of these days you are going to have a stroke. Calm down man.

[JEWELMARGY]

Getting a job and paying your fair share requires more Government? Care to clarify that statement?

I never made such statement. Sure that would be ideal obviously but that's not what the OP is about.

[ElectraDupu]

HD79, one of these days you are going to have a stroke. Calm down man.

Keep wishin & keep hopin RWNJ!!

I'm here for the long haul and will always brandish the truth against you RWNJ's. Keep wishing & hopin RWNJ.

[dodsCooggipsehome]

Doublejack. The OP is stating if you want more than people can provide to give you..get a job. Welfare is not a right. It is a temporary hold over until you can get back on your feet. That is the way I read it anyway.

[Fegasderty]

HD79. I am not wishing you have a stroke. I am saying if you keep your blood pressure this high over partisan politics, you are good candidate for one.

[SpecialOFFER]

HD79. I am not wishing you have a stroke. I am saying if you keep your blood pressure this high over partisanN politics, you are good candidate for one.

My blood pressure is perfectly fine, RWNJ.
I would be more concerned about where you are heading telling those constant Lies, RWNJ!

[proslaviy]

Doublejack. The OP is stating if you want more than people can provide to give you..get a job. Welfare is not a right. It is a temporary hold over until you can get back on your feet. That is the way I read it anyway.

Yes and I agree.

I was addressing the girls methods to deal with those who don't, won't or can't get a job. While her heart is the right place, those options would be vastly more expensive that how we deal with it right now.

[DoctorAlexandro]

I just re-read it Doublejack. You make a valid point.

[SimSlim]

Everything she would impose would require more govt. employees for implementation and enforcement.

Doling out large staple foods would require govt. run distribution centers scattered all over the cities.

Govt. imposed birth control? seriously?

Who would enforce a strict govt. housing program? Hire a bunch more cops to inspect their homes daily?

The last one is awesome. Let the govt. take your shit and sell it, then put you to work for ... the govt? Talk about massive spending right there.


If you were a real libertarian you would rip her shit apart and just get rid of those programs. Instead you think spending more money on them is the right thing to do?

This is a strawman argument, if this was in fact how we handled welfare I can guarantee you welfare participation would drop dramatically, like 80 or 90%.


.
I am not for spending I am for addressing an very abused program that doesnt work.

[trowUrillioth]

from an email I got.

WRITTEN BY A 21 YEAR OLD FEMALE Wow, this girl has a great plan!

Love the last thing she would do the best.

This was written by a 21 yr old female who gets it. It's her future
she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare
big government state that she's being forced to live in! These
solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco , TX , Nov 18, 2011

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no
cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice
and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul
away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal legations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce
or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military
barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of
repair. Your home" will be subject to inspections anytime and
possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox
360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week
or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the
roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we
find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires
and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the
"common good.."

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all
of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.
Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self
esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone
else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered
self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at
least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current
system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes,
that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest.
You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are
receiving a Gov't welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a
job.

Nothing but libertarian fascism.....me thinks this girl's name is Ayn Rand....

[fotodemujerahldesnugdo]

This is a strawman argument, if this was in fact how we handled welfare I can guarantee you welfare participation would drop dramatically, like 80 or 90%.


.
I am not for spending I am for addressing an very abused program that doesnt work.

This is excactly right taking into consideration that you are usually 180 degrees off from reality.

You guarantee an 80-90% increase in welfare spending.

I rest my case.

/bow