![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It can't be other variables when someone does much better than their personal best... doping is your conclusion... or does that only apply to non-US athletes? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Puff puff pass!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"When people ask me about Bolt, I say he could be the greatest athlete of all time," Lewis said. "But for someone to run 10.03 one year and 9.69 the next, if you don't question that in a sport that has the reputation it has right now, you're a fool. Period." |
So the theory here is the Chinese swimmer, Bolt, and all these other impressive (non-US) athletes are just smarter than Americans to use and not get caught?
The tests are held for 7 years... even if Bolt used before that unbelievable race in Beijing, we still can't figure out how to catch him based on his sample? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sure Jason Lezak would obviously be on your guilty list based on his relay performance in Beijing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bolt is proud of how humble he is
As soon as he crossed the line, he did five push-ups, one for each of his Olympic medals. The 4x100 relay is coming up this weekend, and the opportunity for a sixth.
He said afterward, "I'm now a legend. I'm also the greatest athlete to live." http://www.nbcolympics.com/kxas/news...-a-legend.html |
Quote:
|
Totally bogus. They didn't run on the same tracks. The rubber tracks of today are way, way faster than the dirt in the past. Not to mention shoes or training methods. And very possibly the 'better living through chemistry' thing.
|
Quote:
If you have other stuff, that could be added for a case of circumstantial evidence. |
Quote:
And of those, I'm curious to know which ones you believe are probably guilty like Bolt and the Chinese Swimmer. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2