LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-18-2012, 12:16 AM   #1
Mr Andrews

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
347
Senior Member
Default Michael Phelps could be in hot water for photos (could lose London medals)
Michael Phelps could be in hot water -- not the cold bathtub he appears to be in -- for his recent photo shoot with the French luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton.
Photos of Phelps taken by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz were leaked on the Internet late last week, violating the International Olympic Committee's controversial Rule 40, which states athletes can't promote any non-Olympic sponsors from July 18 to Aug. 15. Read the full article here.
Mr Andrews is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 01:39 AM   #2
FuXA8nQM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
No way will he loose his medals. Some jackass leaked the photos but not Phelps or his people. He isn't stupid.
FuXA8nQM is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:02 AM   #3
Hftqdxpm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
This is a ridiculous non-story. Really shoddy journalism on the part of Chris Chase.
Hftqdxpm is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:07 AM   #4
HRS1H7gO

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
Is it? Considering your post in another thread about this issue, it could be something - I don't think he could actually lose his medals (would the IOC really do that?!) but I could see him getting a fine.
HRS1H7gO is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:25 AM   #5
margoaroyo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
They couldn't be contemplating rescinding his medals! That would be a public relations disaster for the Olympic Games in general, not just the American team and for Phelps. Nobody will take any medal winners seriously next time around.

What idiot released the pictures early?
margoaroyo is offline


Old 08-18-2012, 04:45 AM   #6
UpperMan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Is it? Considering your post in another thread about this issue, it could be something - I don't think he could actually lose his medals (would the IOC really do that?!) but I could see him getting a fine.
The IOC isn't going to go after Michael Phelps over pictures taken at an indeterminate time, released by someone other than Michael Phelps, and not as part of any official ad campaign. By the logic of that blogger, any Olympic athlete who has a never before seen baby pic released during the Olympics showing a non-sponsor brand could get fined.

Rule 40 is designed to censor and suppress the tweets and social media output of the participating athletes, who were soundly warned by the IOC to not tweet or upload any pictures of non-sponsors. The silly rule has already done its damage in keeping athletes from freely interacting with people online during the games. There's really no need to make up any additional accusations against the IOC.
UpperMan is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity