[larentont]

Frank Loseyis an attorney who served as Director of Civil Law at the Pentagon and is licensed to appear before the U.S. Supreme Court. He has also provided legal guidance for the Air Force Chief of Staff and Pentagon officials during his 25 years active duty in the U.S. Air Force as a Judge Advocate. After retirement Frank was General Counsel for Trade Associations and a Consulting (Lobbying) Firm that represented multi-billion dollar defense contractors. He is well equipped to take on the HSUS, having obtained statutory changes to Title 10 (Armed Forces Act), Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedure-Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act), Title 26 (Internal Revenue Code), Title 41 (Public Contracts), regulations promulgated by the U.S. Dept. of Defense, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, OSHA, EPA, and the International Maritime Organization. He became involved with dog breeders when asked to help an uncle fight a bill Senator Santorum and HSUS were trying to pass. Frank is not a breeder, he bought a Yorkie for his wife in 1974. The little “puppy mill pet shop dog” lived 18 years Chaucer is responsible for Frank Losey’s determination to "right the unrightable wrongs" of the HSUS. He may be contacted at: f.losey@insightbb.com


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrTPiQUftSg&feature=related"]YouTube - The Darkside of the HSUS - Part 1[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-uHgiilMQA&feature=related"]YouTube - The Darkside of HSUS - Part 2[/ame]

[KatoabamyHant]

Thats good stuff 6pack, thanks for posting it.

[HedgeYourBets]

I've got myself a new hero!

[ThomasMannfanny]

I think he should be president lol

---------- Post added at 03:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 AM ----------

I thought this was pretty interesting....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_..._Terrorism_Act

Basically it prohibits any person from using force, violence, or threats “for the purpose of damaging or interfering with the operations of an animal enterprise.”


I could see how this could help innocent animal farms (for meat, eggs, wool, etc.) and other such animal based companies not be forced out of their buisness if they are actually doing things correctly, humanely, and especially health wise because anything coming from a large corporation will affect people all over the world.

But I could def. see how this act would stop anything from being done to companies that, IMO, are causing harm, abuse, and neglect to animals..... which can then lead to world wide spread diseases, and quickly.

So in a way I agree with the act to save the innocent ones but I disagree with the act because it is worded in a way to save even the F-d up ones that should be shut down.
Too be even more understandable, it is worded in a way to save all large animal corporations .... whether the corporation is good or bad. But the act still allows peaceful protests as long as nothing is done about anything and activists are still allowed to voice their opinion lol.
Really, that's pretty damn funny and messed up at the same time.

My question is, why is this act not being used? If the president was somewhat smart, he'd take all of the HSUS's money and put it back into this country productively.

[larentont]

Because people don't really know about it

[ThomasMannfanny]

Because people don't really know about it

Guess we should take the old mans advice and spread the word lol.
Personally I think the US has this act to save their own asses when it comes to inhumane animal testing..... which we do really need, but it's still F-d up what they do to some of those animals in the process.