[GOLAGLULT]

Mercury is a hot planet, Mars is cold
and the sequence of planets is laid out in a BXE quantum sequence


Explain to me how a ring of dust can form a planet with a molten core.... if you appeal to gravity then leave it, because attraction gravity is impossible

Ok, had to check out the "BXE quantum sequence" thingy, as I had not heard of it before.
It appears to be a new terminology for you also, as you seem to mention it frequently of late.
Not sure why, all it does is reinforce Newtonian Mechanics.

With the ring of dust forming planets with a molten core, again we get back to simple Newtonian gravity.
Also worth noting that with the many aspects of Sun/planetary interactions and gravity, we also have planetary migration which exhibits itself early on the in Accretion disk formation model.
Plenty extra solar evidence for that also.


Ignoring observational evidence re the attraction of gravity is not very scientific either Zarky, and that evidence abounds in the heavens and every where else.

Once again you have no observational evidence for any of your ideas, other then some picture you have formed inside your head.

[Ceakicknunk]

all it does is reinforce Newtonian Mechanics. Good observation BC, clever

Newtonian mechanics is static and relies on anthropogenic concepts .... and of course "attraction as a mechanism for gravity... even Newton knew that mechanism was incorrect... but what else ?

Analysing the Universe as it is yields BXE spin-field (vortices) bubbles.... where gravity is a pressure..
a magnetoelectric model that works

The world is starting to catch on
see
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-magneti...-electric.html

[nobodyhere]

Ignoring observational evidence re the attraction of gravity is not very scientific and such concepts require Dark Energy, Dark Matter and other totally fanciful concepts that have created a Universe in the sky with no foundation.

Gravity is a pressure = PUSH

[Evoncalabbalo]

Good observation BC, clever

Newtonian mechanics is static and relies on anthropogenic concepts .... and of course "attraction as a mechanism for gravity... even Newton knew that mechanism was incorrect... but what else ?

Analysing the Universe as it is yields BXE spin-field (vortices) bubbles.... where gravity is a pressure..
a magnetoelectric model that works

The world is starting to catch on
see
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-magneti...-electric.html

Although Newtonian does not actually give a realistic picture of gravity, it does correctly describe its actions within set paramaters, outside of which GR takes over.
This gives a more highly accurate view with the reality of space/time warpage and curvature.
But you already know that and chose to ignore.

Your link says nothing and your comment about the world catching on, is a fairy tale.

Again, please show some scientific evidence that supports your silly ESGT theory, or at least some example that refutes Planetary formation that we now observe and accept.

[TimoDass]

Ok, had to check out the "BXE quantum sequence" thingy, as I had not heard of it before.
It appears to be a new terminology for you also, as you seem to mention it frequently of late.
Not sure why, all it does is reinforce Newtonian Mechanics. I only checked the first few hits, but in a search for "BXE quantum sequence" the only person who used these words woas someone by the name of Zarkov.


If it is in fact a term used by proper scientists I would be moderately interested to see the context.

[uC4F0NVL]

and such concepts require Dark Energy, Dark Matter and other totally fanciful concepts that have created a Universe in the sky with no foundation.

Gravity is a pressure = PUSH

We have plenty of evidnece for both DE and DM, and we continuilly even as we speak, have real scientists working on it and refining observations and even looking at alternative interpretations.

Gravity is a push?
Yeah OK maybe in your head, but that's about it.

[Ztcgtqvb]

I only checked the first few hits, but in a search for "BXE quantum sequence" the only person who used these words woas someone by the name of Zarkov.


If it is in fact a term used by proper scientists I would be moderately interested to see the context.

You are correct Rev....I was too hasty and just typed the phrase in and up came some stuff which I didn't check out.
yes it belongs to Zarkov and that should teach me a lesson.

So Zarky, I'll take that back, which makes your claims and ideas even more unlikely.

[sat23neus2]

or more likely in this insane poisoned world

*end*

[Loovikeillilen]

Thanks to all those who replied on-topic and constructively.


(I don’t think that Mercury’s ‘atmosphere’ would support humans, interesting though that was.)

[L8fGLM4d]

What about this:

In an ice-world that's warming (as the Earth once was), "...ultra-violet light reacts with water molecules to produce hydrogen-peroxide. When the ice melts, the hydrogen-peroxide breaks down, producing free oxygen."

This was supposed to have happened 660 million years ago, on Earth. Free oxygen, without life. Hey?

[naturaherbal]

What about this:

In an ice-world that's warming (as the Earth once was), "...ultra-violet light reacts with water molecules to produce hydrogen-peroxide. When the ice melts, the hydrogen-peroxide breaks down, producing free oxygen."

This was supposed to have happened 660 million years ago, on Earth. Free oxygen, without life. Hey?

Transient.

[discountviagraman]

the hydrogen-peroxide breaks down, producing free oxygen." and quicker than that, the free oxygen would react with free metals...

no water in the first place
LIFE made the water and the oxygen, and liberated nitrogen

Naturally "water" exists as hydrogen peroxide