[VistaULTIMATEdownloadaPro]

it does now

[nasxbrtyol]

I have to assume that the result of the double slit experiment is due to the field of the photon interacting with the field of the obstructing double slit object. This might suggest that the waveform of a particle is present in the production/maintenance of a particles field?

[jokiruss]

I can't figure out what's going on in that link.

[prowsnobswend]

I can't figure out what's going on in that link.

The visual Bogsnorkler posted worked for me?

[Jackson]

The visual Bogsnorkler posted worked for me? yes, cos i edited it.

maybe look at the wiki page, second link, to get a context KJW.

[WrinnaArraple]

>> Consider an audio waveform. One can describe this as a function over the domain of time,

You mean, a wave peak (say) over a period of time. Frequency.

>> or we can perform a frequency analysis and equivalently express the result as a function over the domain of frequency.


What?

[dyestymum]

i think i have an understanding of what you are saying KJW and i have read similar in other places. the greater than some minimum value is what makes it clearer.

[nicktender]

Seems like you're saying that if we study frequency, we can understand frequency.

[BEyng6hj]

>> or we can perform a frequency analysis and equivalently express the result as a function over the domain of frequency.

Right?

[glasscollector]

I have to assume that the result of the double slit experiment is due to the field of the photon interacting with the field of the obstructing double slit object. This might suggest that the waveform of a particle is present in the production/maintenance of a particles field?

In the double-slit experiment, the wavefunction must be considered as a two-peaked wavefunction if the which-slit information does not exist. If the which-slit information does exist, then the wavefunction must be considered as a single-peaked function corresponding to the slit indicated by the which-slit information. In other words, it is an unavoidable conclusion, that if the slit the photon passed through cannot be determined, then the photon passed through both slits.

[feeshyLew]

In the double-slit experiment, the wavefunction must be considered as a two-peaked wavefunction if the which-slit information does not exist. If the which-slit information does exist, then the wavefunction must be considered as a single-peaked function corresponding to the slit indicated by the which-slit information. In other words, it is an unavoidable conclusion, that if the slit the photon passed through cannot be determined, then the photon passed through both slits.

The photon would not have to pass through both slits if the field of the obstruction responding to the passing of the photon is what is observed in the result. It is not only the photon that is being observed in this experiment?

[disappointment2]

>> or we can perform a frequency analysis and equivalently express the result as a function over the domain of frequency.


What?

Given an audio waveform, one can obtain its frequency spectrum. The mathematical process is called a "Fourier transform".

[Grieryaliny]

Seems like you're saying that if we study frequency, we can understand frequency.

What I'm saying is that there a many ways to describe a waveform. Two particular ways is over time and over frequency. It is natural to focus on the spacetime description of reality, but one can also describe reality in terms of energy-momentum (or as I prefer to call "momentumenergy")

[Goseciwx]

>>
Seems like you're saying that if we study frequency, we can understand frequency.

[GooogleGuy]

has the distance between the double slit and the surface the interference pattern is projected onto been exaggerated to examine the range of this effect?

[Snweyuag]

>> What I'm saying is that there a many ways to describe a waveform. Two particular ways is over time and over frequency.

Amplitude and frequency? This is news?

[allachakb]

The photon would not have to pass through both slits if the field of the obstruction responding to the passing of the photon is what is observed in the result. It is not only the photon that is being observed in this experiment?

If the slit the photon passed through cannot be determined, then the quantum state will be that of the photon passing through both slits. It will be a two-peaked wavefunction that results in the two-slit interference pattern. If the slit the photon passed through can in any way be identified, then the two-slit interference pattern is destroyed and one gets a single-slit pattern.

[exeftWabreava]

has the distance between the double slit and the surface the interference pattern is projected onto been exaggerated to examine the range of this effect?

I mean, wouldn't the range this effect could be observed to be something like the amplitude of the slit/s divided by the frequency of the photon,,, or something like that??

[crazuMovies]

>> What I'm saying is that there a many ways to describe a waveform. Two particular ways is over time and over frequency.

Amplitude and frequency?

Time and frequency. It is an amplitude function over time, or an amplitude function over frequency.

[xanax-buy-online.com]

I mean, wouldn't the range this effect could be observed to be something like the amplitude of the slit/s divided by the frequency of the photon,,, or something like that??

if it did work with a range, would you find that the image returned to a single image at a particular distance?