LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-14-2012, 12:36 AM   #1
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default Is diesel so bad?
This is an opinion piece that quotes what seems to be reasonable sources.

I understood diesel to be a sound choice for environmental reasons.
Do we manufacture it differently or have I misunderstood?

"
By Carl Pope

August 13, 2012

California can, and should, lead the world in ending the menace of soot and black carbon pollution from diesel engines.

We've all choked on black smoke billowing from diesel trucks and buses.
It's obviously polluting, but what's not obvious is much worse.
Diesel emissions are a major health hazard — cancer causing, in fact.
And they are a big part of the threat to our climate.

Yet cleaning them up is practical, easy and affordable — the rules just need to be enforced.

On June 12, the World Health Organization classified diesel particulate matter (soot) as a Group 1 "known carcinogen," adding it to an ugly list of chemicals that includes asbestos and cigarette smoke. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that several thousand America ... "
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 12:51 AM   #2
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
The newer common-rail engined cars are reasonably clean, I believe. But the older cars & (every?) truck with the old-style injector pump are very definitely not as clean at all.
It would be a fearsomely expensive proposition to phase out all the older trucks, etc, and replace them with the new type of injection system-equipped cars & trucks.
There is an additive I know of though that can help clean up the emissions of the older type engines and it also reduces fuel consumption.
As an example, a diesel train using it to go across the Bight to Perth & back would normally use about 88,000 litres, with the product (okay, I'm part of a group that's trying to sell it) the train proved that the consumption went down to about 77,000 litres and the emissions were over 10% improved.
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 12:55 AM   #3
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
The newer common-rail engined cars are reasonably clean, I believe. But the older cars & (every?) truck with the old-style injector pump are very definitely not as clean at all.
It would be a fearsomely expensive proposition to phase out all the older trucks, etc, and replace them with the new type of injection system-equipped cars & trucks.
There is an additive I know of though that can help clean up the emissions of the older type engines and it also reduces fuel consumption.
As an example, a diesel train using it to go across the Bight to Perth & back would normally use about 88,000 litres, with the product (okay, I'm part of a group that's trying to sell it) the train proved that the consumption went down to about 77,000 litres and the emissions were over 10% improved.
Ahhh, thanks Credible Hulk ... that explains it.

My info was based solely around making a decision about buying a NEW vehicle.
Are there rules about (say) all new vehicles being the clean ones?
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:07 AM   #4
DariushPetresku

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
"They" say some LPG bled into the inlet manifold above say, 2,000rpm makes a significant difference-but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous.
DariushPetresku is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:09 AM   #5
xquFzpNw

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous.
*raises eyebrow skeptically*
xquFzpNw is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:15 AM   #6
piramirra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
640
Senior Member
Default
but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous.
Yet people are prepared to drive around with a liqud that has considerably greater explosive energy than gun powder, just sloshing around uinder their boot.
piramirra is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:17 AM   #7
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Ahhh, thanks Credible Hulk ... that explains it.

My info was based solely around making a decision about buying a NEW vehicle.
Are there rules about (say) all new vehicles being the clean ones?
I think the current Aussie rules have the new cars following the Euro5 emissions standards, which are quite clean indeed. So you you wanted to get something like, say, a Volkswagen Polo Bluemotion, you can count on it be quite clean and very frugal.
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:17 AM   #8
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
"They" say some LPG bled into the inlet manifold above say, 2,000rpm makes a significant difference-but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous.
Ever been in a taxi?
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:24 AM   #9
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
I think the current Aussie rules have the new cars following the Euro5 emissions standards, which are quite clean indeed. So you you wanted to get something like, say, a Volkswagen Polo Bluemotion, you can count on it be quite clean and very frugal.
Yes. That was the one.
Now have a VW van ... diesel again. LWB something converted to motorhome kind of thing.
Assume the same principle; it was important to me. but very ignorant about even questions to ask.
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:29 AM   #10
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Yes. That was the one.
Now have a VW van ... diesel again. LWB something converted to motorhome kind of thing.
Assume the same principle; it was important to me. but very ignorant about even questions to ask.
Do you know if it has common-rail injection?
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:35 AM   #11
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Do you know if it has common-rail injection?
Short answer ... no.

Longer answer, NFI


I will look it up tomorrow.
It is just 18 months old if that matters.
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:36 AM   #12
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Short answer ... no.

Longer answer, NFI


I will look it up tomorrow.
It is just 18 months old if that matters.
It'll be common-rail then.
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:39 AM   #13
ehib8yPc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
It'll be common-rail then.
ok
taa

*feels relieved*

It's so crazy driving around knowing so little


thank and good night.
ehib8yPc is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 02:54 AM   #14
nilliraq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
Candles add to the warmth & atmosphere of a home,
but some candles can contribute to an indoor air pollution
problem by emitting particulate matter (candle soot) into
the air. Candle pollution not only discolors the walls, ceilings
and contents of a home it can also contaminate the ventilation
system's ductwork. This is especially true of ducts constructed
from fiberglass "duct-board". It appears that petroleum-based
(paraffin) candles and scented and/or aromatic candles are the
worst offenders. Most candles on the market today are made
from paraffin wax or a blend of paraffin and other waxes.
Paraffin is a derivative of petroleum. When burned they
release carcinogenic toxins such as benzene, toluene,
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein and soot into the air.
The emissions from paraffin candles contain many of the
same toxins produced by burning diesel fuel. It is like
starting up a diesel engine inside you home!


nilliraq is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:01 AM   #15
VQdeochratis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Candles add to the warmth & atmosphere of a home,
but some candles can contribute to an indoor air pollution
problem by emitting particulate matter (candle soot) into
the air. Candle pollution not only discolors the walls, ceilings
and contents of a home it can also contaminate the ventilation
system's ductwork. This is especially true of ducts constructed
from fiberglass "duct-board". It appears that petroleum-based
(paraffin) candles and scented and/or aromatic candles are the
worst offenders. Most candles on the market today are made
from paraffin wax or a blend of paraffin and other waxes.
Paraffin is a derivative of petroleum. When burned they
release carcinogenic toxins such as benzene, toluene,
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein and soot into the air.
The emissions from paraffin candles contain many of the
same toxins produced by burning diesel fuel. It is like
starting up a diesel engine inside you home!


LOL, where the hell did you drag that load of crap from.
VQdeochratis is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:05 AM   #16
DownloadADOBEsoftware

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
LOL, where the hell did you drag that load of crap from.
Woo-woo ...... !
DownloadADOBEsoftware is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:05 AM   #17
nilliraq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
LOL, where the hell did you drag that load of crap from.
Crap ?


http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/candles2.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0819153913.htm


There's plenty more "crap" where that "crap" came from.
nilliraq is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:06 AM   #18
VQdeochratis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
"They" say some LPG bled into the inlet manifold above say, 2,000rpm makes a significant difference-but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous.
Diesel LPG mix has been around for years. They make diesel engines even more efficient than they already are. The trouble is they worked so well the government removed the rebate from anyone wanting to fit a system to their vehicle.
VQdeochratis is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:08 AM   #19
VQdeochratis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Crap ?


http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/candles2.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0819153913.htm


There's plenty more "crap" where that "crap" came from.
You comparing it to Diesel is the crap.Diesel is much cleaner.
VQdeochratis is offline


Old 08-14-2012, 03:09 AM   #20
VQdeochratis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
You comparing it to Diesel is the crap.Diesel is much cleaner.
Sorry, it wasn't you it was in the article....if you can call it that.
VQdeochratis is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:23 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity