Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
This is an opinion piece that quotes what seems to be reasonable sources.
I understood diesel to be a sound choice for environmental reasons. Do we manufacture it differently or have I misunderstood? " By Carl Pope August 13, 2012 California can, and should, lead the world in ending the menace of soot and black carbon pollution from diesel engines. We've all choked on black smoke billowing from diesel trucks and buses. It's obviously polluting, but what's not obvious is much worse. Diesel emissions are a major health hazard — cancer causing, in fact. And they are a big part of the threat to our climate. Yet cleaning them up is practical, easy and affordable — the rules just need to be enforced. On June 12, the World Health Organization classified diesel particulate matter (soot) as a Group 1 "known carcinogen," adding it to an ugly list of chemicals that includes asbestos and cigarette smoke. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that several thousand America ... " |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
The newer common-rail engined cars are reasonably clean, I believe. But the older cars & (every?) truck with the old-style injector pump are very definitely not as clean at all.
It would be a fearsomely expensive proposition to phase out all the older trucks, etc, and replace them with the new type of injection system-equipped cars & trucks. There is an additive I know of though that can help clean up the emissions of the older type engines and it also reduces fuel consumption. As an example, a diesel train using it to go across the Bight to Perth & back would normally use about 88,000 litres, with the product (okay, I'm part of a group that's trying to sell it) the train proved that the consumption went down to about 77,000 litres and the emissions were over 10% improved. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
The newer common-rail engined cars are reasonably clean, I believe. But the older cars & (every?) truck with the old-style injector pump are very definitely not as clean at all. My info was based solely around making a decision about buying a NEW vehicle. Are there rules about (say) all new vehicles being the clean ones? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Ahhh, thanks Credible Hulk ... that explains it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I think the current Aussie rules have the new cars following the Euro5 emissions standards, which are quite clean indeed. So you you wanted to get something like, say, a Volkswagen Polo Bluemotion, you can count on it be quite clean and very frugal. Now have a VW van ... diesel again. LWB something converted to motorhome kind of thing. Assume the same principle; it was important to me. but very ignorant about even questions to ask. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Candles add to the warmth & atmosphere of a home,
but some candles can contribute to an indoor air pollution problem by emitting particulate matter (candle soot) into the air. Candle pollution not only discolors the walls, ceilings and contents of a home it can also contaminate the ventilation system's ductwork. This is especially true of ducts constructed from fiberglass "duct-board". It appears that petroleum-based (paraffin) candles and scented and/or aromatic candles are the worst offenders. Most candles on the market today are made from paraffin wax or a blend of paraffin and other waxes. Paraffin is a derivative of petroleum. When burned they release carcinogenic toxins such as benzene, toluene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein and soot into the air. The emissions from paraffin candles contain many of the same toxins produced by burning diesel fuel. It is like starting up a diesel engine inside you home! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Candles add to the warmth & atmosphere of a home, |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
LOL, where the hell did you drag that load of crap from.
Crap ? http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/candles2.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0819153913.htm There's plenty more "crap" where that "crap" came from. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
"They" say some LPG bled into the inlet manifold above say, 2,000rpm makes a significant difference-but I don't want H2/LPG on or in my vehicle--too damn dangerous. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Crap ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|