Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
http://flowerchild.com.au/amber-teet...ne-p-1591.html
I'm dubious, and I don't think small children should wear necklaces made with such small beads. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
http://www.fairtrading.qld.gov.au/am...g-necklace.htm
The office of fair trading isn't especially enthusiastic either. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Confirmation bias comes into play here, teething is a quite transitory thing, a tooth erupts gives the child a lot of grief for a short time then heals, if someone has a grisly kid and puts an amber necklace on and a few days later the kid calms down they think it must be the amber working. My partners grandkids have amber necklaces, have had homeopathic vaccinations all the natural things as far as I can see it hasn't helped one bit. (grumbles about bloody homeopathic vaccinations and keeps fingers crossed that enough parents at their Kinda actually have their kids immunised with real vaccines)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
OK, there seems to be virtually no research (surprise, surprise!). PubMed doesn't want to know. Google Scholar doesn't really find much. Health on the Net likewise. But on a general search, the scepticon site does have something, and it does have some references at the bottom. It's the best I can find. I still think offering a choking hazard is the biggest problem......
http://scepticon.wordpress.com/2011/...s-to-consider/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
OK, there seems to be virtually no research (surprise, surprise!). PubMed doesn't want to know. Google Scholar doesn't really find much. Health on the Net likewise. But on a general search, the scepticon site does have something, and it does have some references at the bottom. It's the best I can find. I still think offering a choking hazard is the biggest problem...... The is nil substance to the absorbtion of anything from the amber, it is a fossil. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Gosh... Until this thread, I'd never heard of them! What do the nephews mums think of their efficacy? |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Wataday said it best when he said "Confirmation bias comes into play here" Quote from my partner.. "Suposed to eliminate all the side effects like bumb rash and drooling....." I'm skeptical myself, being able to prove that it's useless would be too hard. ie monitoring of a 2yo nappy changes over night and food intake....... ect ![]() Has drawn remarks such as "he looks like he should have a surfboard and a Sandman". |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Teething pain is a complete myth. Your child is teething for about 3 years (seriously, teeth are constantly moving through the gums for years). In that time they will be grumpy, chew on things, get rashes. Blaming it all on teething is convenient but without any evidence.
Stick something in the kid's mouth, maybe they get distracted, maybe there is confirmation bias on the mothers part, maybe people just make associations where none exist. The fact is they do nothing a plastic chew toy doesn't do but with far higher risks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Teething pain is a complete myth. Your child is teething for about 3 years (seriously, teeth are constantly moving through the gums for years). In that time they will be grumpy, chew on things, get rashes. Blaming it all on teething is convenient but without any evidence. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|