LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-13-2010, 06:14 AM   #1
Indidockobeni

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default Explain to me about this lens...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...0mm_f_1_8.html

why is it so cheap?

and what is the major difference between that and this one:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Autofocus.html


and is 50mm the way to go if I HAVE to get a fixed range?



I want the lowest possible aperture, and they are either fixed or $1,500. So unless some one wants to pay for me to get a $1,500 lens I have to get a fixed one.

Help!
Indidockobeni is offline


Old 08-13-2010, 06:23 AM   #2
Jeaxatoem

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
I tried to tell the difference by looking at the specs
Looks to me like the cheaper one is better
I would look at canon website at these two to find more details
Jeaxatoem is offline


Old 08-13-2010, 06:31 AM   #3
provigil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Your op kinda confuses me.

Janie not only is the f range different I suggest you take a real close look at the build. The 1.8 which is called " the nifty fifty " is made of plastic. The 1.4 is more solidly built.

I've owned the 1.8 twice and was very impressed with the output it gave me. I didn't hang on to either though cuz it didn't suit my style and what I like to shoot.


Here's a link that you might be able to extract some useful info out of.

http://www0.epinions.com/review/pr-C...t_412667907716

And a review of the nifty fifty

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/r...ns-review.aspx

And a review of the f 1.4

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/r...ns-review.aspx
provigil is offline


Old 08-13-2010, 06:33 AM   #4
Mimsykzr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
I tried to tell the difference by looking at the specs
Looks to me like the cheaper one is better
I would look at canon website at these two to find more details
You might change your mind if you read my links.

That said, many people consider the Nifty Fifty to be one of their best investments as far as a prime lens is concerned. It's packs a big punch for the buck and is fantastic for the budget minded.
Mimsykzr is offline


Old 08-13-2010, 06:38 AM   #5
Oppofeescom

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
Ok I think I understand what you were asking... maybe...

A zoom is a zoom and a " fixed " is considered in photography talk as being " a prime " lens.

Read this Janie...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_lens
Oppofeescom is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 07:47 AM   #6
dmoiknlasd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
by fixed I meant fixed focal length!

as in can I really use a 50mm for what I want to do???

Can I find a lens that has a focal range and is still f1.something for under $1,000???



i don't have $400 to spend! but it does look like the f1.4 is a good lens for me...right?
dmoiknlasd is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 02:59 PM   #7
22CreessGah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
by fixed I meant fixed focal length!

as in can I really use a 50mm for what I want to do???

Can I find a lens that has a focal range and is still f1.something for under $1,000???



i don't have $400 to spend! but it does look like the f1.4 is a good lens for me...right?
Janie the 1.4 is a hell of a good lens but so is the 1.8 for the cost. I know you're on a budget, we all are and that's why I'm not going to answer yes or no because if you buy something and find out it doesn't suit your style of shooting you will end up hating me. What I would suggest you do is go to a camera shop and have them bolt one to your body. You can fool around with it, get the feel of it's range and see if it's what you expected. I found mine to be excellent for shooting people at parties and such. It didn't suit for birding or even scenery... but... your tastes are considerably different than mine. You're a hell of a lot more artsy fartsy and you would probably get a lot more use out of it than I did.

Now if it was me buying the lens I would get the 1.4 for many reasons but mainly because of it's build quality. It's much more robust, has a metal mount instead of being all plastic, quieter, faster on the focus, etc. In other words it's built to last where the 1.8 is disposable imo.

Make sense.
22CreessGah is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 03:02 PM   #8
DoctorTDent

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
Here's something else worth trying Janie. Take your existing kit lens and set it at 50mm. Then walk around, whack off a bunch of shots and see if the focal range is ok for you. I think you'll find it very limiting.
DoctorTDent is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 07:27 PM   #9
detskpit

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
350
Senior Member
Default
Here's something else worth trying Janie. Take your existing kit lens and set it at 50mm. Then walk around, whack off a bunch of shots and see if the focal range is ok for you. I think you'll find it very limiting.
lol DUH! Thanks guy!

and I could NEVER hate you!!!
detskpit is offline


Old 09-13-2010, 01:08 AM   #10
wrewsTear

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
lol DUH! Thanks guy!
We always try and tackle an issue in the hardest way possible.

and I could NEVER hate you!!!
Kewl beans. Wanna go halfers on a kid then?
wrewsTear is offline


Old 09-13-2010, 01:23 AM   #11
Fegemiembendy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
hm...you can have it. I don't want kids.
Fegemiembendy is offline


Old 09-13-2010, 01:30 AM   #12
Virosponna

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
hm...you can have it. I don't want kids.
Neither do I but we could practice just for the hell of it.
Virosponna is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 11:02 AM   #13
outsitWrord

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...0mm_f_1_8.html

why is it so cheap?

and what is the major difference between that and this one:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Autofocus.html


and is 50mm the way to go if I HAVE to get a fixed range?



I want the lowest possible aperture, and they are either fixed or $1,500. So unless some one wants to pay for me to get a $1,500 lens I have to get a fixed one.

Help!
The reason why the 50 f/18 is so cheap, it is the way it is built compared to the way the 1.4 is built. Plus the 1.4 has a distance scale on it, something very useful if you know how to get the best out of it
outsitWrord is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 11:10 AM   #14
Wvq9InTM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
Plus the focusing is USM, a much better way of focusing
Wvq9InTM is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 12:44 PM   #15
Kubasarika

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Plus the focusing is USM, a much better way of focusing
The USM is just faster and quieter.

Tuffy you have the Nifty Fifty don't you? Tell her what you think of it.
Kubasarika is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 12:46 PM   #16
heilyprollecyspor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
The USM is just faster and quieter.

Tuffy you have the Nifty Fifty don't you? Tell her what you think of it.
I think it will do a lot of good, for portraits, but don't expect too much in low lights compared to the f/1.4
heilyprollecyspor is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 01:10 PM   #17
santorio

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
I think it will do a lot of good, for portraits, but don't expect too much in low lights compared to the f/1.4
I'm thinkin' she might wanna hear if it's a good walk around lens or not. I didn't find much use of the 50mm as I said before. She needs to explain her shooting style to be able to properly answer this question.
santorio is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 01:22 PM   #18
budumol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
299
Senior Member
Default
I'm thinkin' she might wanna hear if it's a good walk around lens or not. I didn't find much use of the 50mm as I said before. She needs to explain her shooting style to be able to properly answer this question.
Pffft, that is hard to say for a good walk around lens, I would suggest 24-105mm is a good walk around lens (i.e. good focal length range) but that is even more expensive than the 50mm f/1.4, but it is a good lens to practice with if that is what you mean
budumol is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 01:33 PM   #19
mtautomoscow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
Pffft, that is hard to say for a good walk around lens, I would suggest 24-105mm is a good walk around lens (i.e. good focal length range) but that is even more expensive than the 50mm f/1.4, but it is a good lens to practice with if that is what you mean
That's kind of what I mean but I'm being very careful. I don't want to tell her that lens or any other would be suitable because if it turns out wrong I'm dead meat. Like I said before she and all the rest of us are on a budget of some sort and gotta watch where the most bang for the buck is.

I snapped up a used 28 - 135mm lens that I'm kinda getting fond of as a walk around lens. T'was cheap and it produces decent results.
mtautomoscow is offline


Old 10-12-2010, 01:40 PM   #20
brurdefdoro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
That's kind of what I mean but I'm being very careful. I don't want to tell her that lens or any other would be suitable because if it turns out wrong I'm dead meat. Like I said before she and all the rest of us are on a budget of some sort and gotta watch where the most bang for the buck is.

I snapped up a used 28 - 135mm lens that I'm kinda getting fond of as a walk around lens. T'was cheap and it produces decent results.
Even if you were pro, I think budget would still come into mind. I mean you can't just splash the cash everywhere, you are going to have days where jobs are thin on the ground so to speak
brurdefdoro is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity