Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Richard after his loss to Vemic last week:
""I am very motivated. I hope to quickly return to the Top 20. Take anyone in the first round -- Nadal, Federer, a qualifier, doesn't matter who, I don't care. I was very unhappy to find myself for a long time in front of the television. I know I'm no longer part of the best in the world, but I hope to find myself there again." Well, Richie, you asked for it. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
All that I was saying is that it's the same matchup over and over, not that it means a rigged draw!
Randomly, of course. And besides, I'm not sure how you can say this is a conspiracy in favor of Roger or against Novak. In FO 09, for instance, people wanted Rafa and Nole to be in opposite halves because it seemed that they were the two best clay courters of the season and that Nole would never get over Rafa on clay. In USO 08 and AO 09, fans of Novak wanted him on Roger's side because Roger seemed weak coming in. On the flip side, fans of Roger didn't want to see Roger play Novak in Wimby 08 or USO 08 because of AO 08. Sure, retrospectively, it might seem that Roger has benefited but how would the conspirators, for instance, have predicted that in FO 09, PEHK would take out Novak, the second-best clay courter of the season, and clear the way for Roger? Anyways, I guess I should stop arguing... |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|