Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
I love the clay for the men. For the women, not so much. Too many unforced errors and the game of the so-called big babes is neutered. But, for the men, I find it absolutely fascinating. ![]() Men's game on the other hand becames too much based on defence and patience in boring 30-shot baseline rallies. I don't like that at all... |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
It's the other way around for me. Neutering not too smart players is great.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
Even though clay is my favorite part of the season, I agree that it can be boring if the rallies are 25 shots and beyond with no one controlling the point. Best example, a US Open match Chang lost to Andrei Cherkasov, circa 1990, where they just kept hitting back to each other. I started preparing a noose. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
I love the clay for the men. For the women, not so much. Too many unforced errors and the game of the so-called big babes is neutered. But, for the men, I find it absolutely fascinating. I just watched a really nice set between Navarro and Stakhovkiy, better tennis than Ljubo-Clement, actually. But similar brain farts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (0 members and 8 guests) | |
|