[Drugmachine]

we all know that iran was in some way connected to the bombing in israel, however is the bombing in russia related to this?
i bet there is a connection, and the connection is iran.
what you think?

There is a connection. Islamist ideology. According to which, the Koran was given on Tuesday. So Tuesday is a "good day" for a terrorist to die and mass murder others in the process.

9-11 was a Tuesday.

[Peptobismol]

you are blind to the fact that arabs from all countries are involved in murder in israel, russia and all around the world takeo...
blaming it on bush is ridiculous...
if anything terror has been increasing for many decades, when islamists realiased they could say, bomb beirut, and have no consequence...
during the clinton era, terror was escalated with bombings on american embassies... its been constantly escalated, from emply planes bombed, to hostage situations, to suicide bombing... in september 11 2001, they crossed the line, bush and his collegues responded in kind, and i hope he finishes the job.

if anything i blame terror on french and german appeasors, who let the "prototype" terrorists go scott free from their crimes... if not for israeli intellegence all the murderers of munich olympic games would be alive...
it is your countries self-destructive global politics which causes others people to die.

[HedgeYourBets]

saddam was an adament supporter of terrorism, you cant possibly disagree that he wasnt a danger, or could not have been on in the future?
Saddam didn't support al-quaida or any international terrorist organisation, he gave money to the families of suicide-terrorists (as so many Islamic states) in Israel, but this makes Iraq hardly an important terrorist-supporting country, especially not since the Bush-f has close relations to Saoudi Arabia... The terrorists who were in Iraq have long ceased their activities and no longer a danger to the West in any way. Face it, Saddam wasn't supporting current terror against Western Europe or the US and had no connection to the dangerous international terrorist organisations which are in the focus of the war on terror. Saddam was even less a danger than currently Libia, which restored diplomatic relations with the us. (something Saddam was all too keen to do as well if he only could). Saddam wasn't a threat to the west, never was by the way, he even executed the western policy in the 80's.





to clean up terror, the regimes in saudi arabia, iran and syria would need to be deposed, im sure there would be even less support there...
neither Iran, nor Syria have any links to the terror organisations which terrorise the world currently, on the contrary syria itself has been a victim of those organisation on more than one occasion and they are heavily oppressed in syria. Iran always opposed al-quaida and the Taliban and cooperated in the war against the Taliban. Your focus is all wrong, at least if fighting terror against the US and western Europe is your real goal.
Saoudi Arabia is a secret supporter and cradle of many worldwide terrorist organisations, but they remain the closest friends of your preferate president... if this isn't a contradiction I don't know what is, how much more proove do you need he isn't sincere in fighting terrorism?

regardless, the western world, including france, placed sanctions on saddam, and stated exactly what would happen if he persued a certain path... when he crossed the line, offcourse the whole world had to wait for U.S. to enforce what the whole world had agreed upon, and rather than stand in solidarity with america, france and a few other european countries have weaseled out of their duties and have backed piece of s*** regimes who have never done anything for them, over their fellow democracies. saddam didn't cross the line, he cooperated with the inspectors and did everything required by the UN-resolutions. Meanwhile the sanctions once instored to encourage saddam to get rid of his wMD's have been abused since many years by GB and the US for political goals, while the rest of the world wanted to abolish these inhumane sanctions.


iraq is only, what you consider a "terrorist haven" because its situated between 3 of the worlds greatest terrorist supporting nations on the planet, who export their citzens for mass murder. but if so why wasn't Iraq a terrorist haven before you invaded Iraq in the context of "war on terror"? it only became a terrorist haven after you came there to occupy this country which never harmed the US and where you totally messed up.

if america had its way, democracy would be established, its the fault of iraq's nieghbours and european appeasers, who have vilified iraq and turned it into the wild west. so it was europe who turned Iraq in the Wild west? The US were innocent powerless spectators looking from the sidelines? Do you actually believe this BS yourself? The US is omnipotent in Iraq since march 2003 and their disasterous policy gave way to the current situation.
If we had it our way, Iraq wouldn't be at war and wouldn't be a terrorist haven where islamists make the rules and 1000's of people get kidnapped..
if we had it our way we would fight al-quaida together with the us, and abolish the sanctions against Iraq just as we did in the case of Libia and any country wich doesn't support terrorism (any more) against the Western world.
We would focus on other countries such as Saoudi Arabia and pakistan where international terrorist groups hide and get refuge, and where religious groups still finance and teach wahabist extremists worldwide.