LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-06-2011, 02:55 AM   #1
poRmawayncmop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
664
Senior Member
Default After Death of USB--do we fear another leader? NO
I remember 9/11 very well--and as I became so interested in USB--I started reading as many books as I could get my hands on about how they think--why they attacked us versus their other two targets, etc. which was 9/11.

The head of the snake has been cut off--and congratulations to President Barack Obama to make that decision when some in his adminstration were against it. This nation has a reason to celebrate. The head of the snake has finally been cut off.

But the question we see from ALL networks--is who is going to take Bin Laden's place. My answer after all these years and what I have read is. NO ONE.

They are defeated--there are no other generals or terrorists co-ops to take Bin Laden's place. They simply do not THINK or plan like anything like us. We are a different breed--and most of them "the fighters" come from what we know as the 13th century.

They're have lost their leader--or the poster boy of terroismn--and now their done.

They had U.S navy special forces sticking a gun right in USB's face in the best stealth attack ever known to man--"instead of bombing" and this is one thing that terrorist's actually RESPECT. It's over.
poRmawayncmop is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 02:58 AM   #2
Adeniinteme

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
Seriously? The rest of them will just surrender?
Adeniinteme is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:20 AM   #3
deandrecooke

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Seriously? The rest of them will just surrender?
Not surrender--but just fade away into the distance.
deandrecooke is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:24 AM   #4
RenyBontes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Does that mean the government will no longer penetrate your wife during an airport screening, assuring you it's the only way you'll be "safe?"
RenyBontes is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:28 AM   #5
preptarra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
Does that mean the government will no longer penetrate your wife during an airport screening, assuring you it's the only way you'll be "safe?"
Are we being a little overly dramatic here?

This never happened, unless there were STRONG evidence that your wife (and you're probably not even married!) was either trafficking drugs or was on the list of "most wanted terrorists!"

Give me a break! I don't like airport security anymore than anyone else, but this is a ridiculous statement! Do you know that you lose credibility when you get sooooo extreme?
preptarra is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:29 AM   #6
nvideoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Are we being a little overly dramatic here?

This never happened, unless there were STRONG evidence that your wife (and you're probably not even married!) was either trafficking drugs or was on the list of "most wanted terrorists!"

Give me a break! I don't like airport security anymore than anyone else, but this is a ridiculous statement! Do you know that you lose credibility when you get sooooo extreme?
Actually, if you refuse a body scan, a TSA agent will insert her fingers partially into your vagina, if you have a vagina.
nvideoe is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:30 AM   #7
Eromaveabeara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Does that mean the government will no longer penetrate your wife during an airport screening, assuring you it's the only way you'll be "safe?"
Nope it doesn't mean that.
Eromaveabeara is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:32 AM   #8
Siuchingach

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
I remember 9/11 very well--and as I became so interested in USB--I started reading as many books as I could get my hands on about how they think--why they attacked us versus their other two targets, etc. which was 9/11.

The head of the snake has been cut off--and congratulations to President Barack Obama to make that decision when some in his adminstration were against it. This nation has a reason to celebrate. The head of the snake has finally been cut off.

But the question we see from ALL networks--is who is going to take Bin Laden's place. My answer after all these years and what I have read is. NO ONE.

They are defeated--there are no other generals or terrorists co-ops to take Bin Laden's place. They simply do not THINK or plan like anything like us. We are a different breed--and most of them "the fighters" come from what we know as the 13th century.

They're have lost their leader--or the poster boy of terroismn--and now their done.

They had U.S navy special forces sticking a gun right in USB's face in the best stealth attack ever known to man--"instead of bombing" and this is one thing that terrorist's actually RESPECT. It's over.
I really hope you're right, but I certainly wouldn't bet on that! And I'm usually accused on being too optimistic!

Still, I think that between the new situation in the Middle East (with REAL citizens are taking their own destiny in their hands, instead of letting extremists act and think for them), and the clear cut execution of Bin Laden, any intelligent person (and I don't believe that Muslims are more stupid than anyone else) would rething the situation!

It seems that they have more to gain through revolution that through terrorism!
So, maybe there is hope, if not immediately, for the mid-term.
Siuchingach is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:33 AM   #9
zenihan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
I really hope you're right, but I certainly wouldn't bet on that! And I'm usually accused on being too optimistic!

Still, I think that between the new situation in the Middle East (with REAL citizens are taking their own destiny in their hands, instead of letting extremists act and think for them), and the clear cut execution of Bin Laden, any intelligent person (and I don't believe that Muslims are more stupid than anyone else) would rething the situation!

It seems that they have more to gain through revolution that through terrorism!
So, maybe there is hope, if not immediately, for the mid-term.
The Muslim Brotherhood are not extremeists?
zenihan is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:34 AM   #10
antipenq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Actually, if you refuse a body scan, a TSA agent will insert her fingers partially into your vagina, if you have a vagina.
You are ridiculous! Everybody doesn't get a body scan, and if they refuse, they may get a close body pat, but not a full vagina examination.

Where do you get your stories?

Please. . .check your information!
antipenq is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:35 AM   #11
mplawssix

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
You are ridiculous! Everybody doesn't get a body scan, and if they refuse, they may get a close body pat, but not a full vagina examination.

Where do you get your stories?

Please. . .check your information!
OK, a partial vaginal examination.

Are we "safe" if we let government partially penetrate our wives at airports?
mplawssix is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:37 AM   #12
fluoxet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
The Muslim Brotherhood are not extremeists?
No more than the Westboro Church, the KKK, and I would even be tempted to say many members of the tea party!

No more than fundamental born again Christians.

Could there be extremists among them? Sure!

Aren't there Christian extremists, tea party extremists?

Stupid people exist in every group, in every part of the world, and they come in every color, every age, every religious affiliation.
fluoxet is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:41 AM   #13
Asianunta

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
No more than the Westboro Church, the KKK, and I would even be tempted to say many members of the tea party!

No more than fundamental born again Christians.

Could there be extremists among them? Sure!

Aren't there Christian extremists, tea party extremists?

Stupid people exist in every group, in every part of the world, and they come in every color, every age, every religious affiliation.
None of those other groups control governments of tens of millions of people.
Asianunta is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:41 AM   #14
nemoforone

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
I remember 9/11 very well--and as I became so interested in USB--I started reading as many books as I could get my hands on about how they think--why they attacked us versus their other two targets, etc. which was 9/11.

The head of the snake has been cut off--and congratulations to President Barack Obama to make that decision when some in his adminstration were against it. This nation has a reason to celebrate. The head of the snake has finally been cut off.

But the question we see from ALL networks--is who is going to take Bin Laden's place. My answer after all these years and what I have read is. NO ONE.

They are defeated--there are no other generals or terrorists co-ops to take Bin Laden's place. They simply do not THINK or plan like anything like us. We are a different breed--and most of them "the fighters" come from what we know as the 13th century.

They're have lost their leader--or the poster boy of terroismn--and now their done.

They had U.S navy special forces sticking a gun right in USB's face in the best stealth attack ever known to man--"instead of bombing" and this is one thing that terrorist's actually RESPECT. It's over.
I started studying Bin Laden and, more importantly, Al Qaeda, as early as 1993.

Your view is naive.

I would hope that you're right. I would hope that those who would do us hard will simply fade away.

Sadly, that's not going to happen.

Who'll take his place? Well, we may not have any idea, and that's a major part of the problem. Someone's going to. We just may not have any idea who that is yet...
nemoforone is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:42 AM   #15
Cyncceply

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
OK, a partial vaginal examination.

Are we "safe" if we let government partially penetrate our wives at airports?
As I said before, I am not a fan of airport security. Not because I think that they are all perverts, I believe they are just doing their jobs, and probably NOT liking it very much!

But I do not believe that they will just kidnap your wife to finger her!(actually, they would more likely kidnap you and finger your anal cavity! yuk!)

And if you're so afraid of that . . . take the body scan!

Now, the reason I am not a fan of airport security is because I believe it would be a lot easier for a terrorist wanting to bomb an airport to do it about 2 minutes before they reach the screener. Why wait until they get on a plane, where ONLY a maximum of about 300 people could be killed, when they could explode their bomb just before the scanner, and kill every security guard, and every passenger waiting to be screened, plus created such a chaos that another 200 people could easily be trampled and the airport damaged, and flights disrupted for weeks, if not months!

So, I think it is kind of silly to search people. The only thing that seems pretty efficient are the dogs. They would detect a terrorist BEFORE scanning!
Cyncceply is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:45 AM   #16
Michmant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
None of those other groups control governments of tens of millions of people.
So what? You are actually showing how silly your point is: there are VERY FEW terrorists among those 10 millions of people. If there were not very few, they could already have taken Israel over, as well as half of Europe, and WE would be dead meat!

It is precisely because MOST Muslims are reasonable people, who do not enjoy living in an extremist state that there is so much change happening in the Middle East right now.
Michmant is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:50 AM   #17
dosyrotsbop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Actually, if you refuse a body scan, a TSA agent will insert her fingers partially into your vagina, if you have a vagina.
Can you prove this? My bullshit meter is detecting something.
dosyrotsbop is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:56 AM   #18
furillo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
439
Senior Member
Default
Can you prove this? My bullshit meter is detecting something.
I think Revere has a little problem with reality.

I believe he met "a pat down," but, maybe he watches too many erotic videos!
furillo is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 03:57 AM   #19
TeemFilla

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
I really hope you're right, but I certainly wouldn't bet on that! And I'm usually accused on being too optimistic!

Still, I think that between the new situation in the Middle East (with REAL citizens are taking their own destiny in their hands, instead of letting extremists act and think for them), and the clear cut execution of Bin Laden, any intelligent person (and I don't believe that Muslims are more stupid than anyone else) would rething the situation!

It seems that they have more to gain through revolution that through terrorism!
So, maybe there is hope, if not immediately, for the mid-term.
Believe me--I have read enough and studied their mindset enough to post this thread. We're talking about people who's mindset comes from the 13th-16th century and once their leader is defeated--they simply vanish-&-their will to fight and die is no longer there. I think I am right on this. A second leader--just wouldn't be able to convince these people who cannot read or write to follow him--like USB could. USB was everything to them--and No One can replace him.
TeemFilla is offline


Old 02-06-2011, 04:01 AM   #20
FelicitaJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
541
Senior Member
Default
Believe me--I have read enough and studied their mindset enough to post this thread. We're talking about people who's mindset comes from the 13th century and once their leader is defeated--they simply vanish--their will to fight and die is no longer there. I think I am right on this.
Okay! I will hold YOU responsible for any further act of terrorism!

I do like your optimism. I think if we can imagine a future that is brighter, with more respect for all, we have a better chance to make it happen, than if we focus on "preparing" for wars and destruction.

The only people who benefit from that are the CEO's of the defense industry!
FelicitaJ is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity