[arrismVam]

"We don´t trust the west anymore."

Gadaffi tells about the Situation:

YouTube - Gadaffi



My question to Obama and the other Leaders, but also at you, dear USPOL-Members:
Who get advantages depriving Gadaffi and his govenment of power?
And do you think, Obama could answer? Does he know, who has the advantage?

Let me answer: The global terrorism!

Why do we forward Al-Quida?

[PharmACT]

i couldnt get through the minutes of propaganda. But it's good to see that he is open for negotiations because things seem to move in that direction.

[RichardHaads]

"We don´t trust the west anymore."

Gadaffi tells about the Situation:

YouTube - Gadaffi



My question to Obama and the other Leaders, but also at you, dear USPOL-Members:
Who get advantages depriving Gadaffi and his govenment of power?
And do you think, Obama could answer? Does he know, who has the advantage?

Let me answer: The global terrorism!

Why do we forward Al-Quida?

I think you're stealing Alma's schtick.

[htDgExh8]

"We don´t trust the west anymore" Gadaffi tells about the situation:
YouTube - Gadaffi

My question to Obama and the other Leaders, but also at you, dear USPOL-Members:
Who get advantages depriving Gadaffi and his government of power?
And do you think, Obama could answer? Does he know, who has the advantage?

I allowed myself to slightly modify your message in my quote, and took profit to turn your question into an actual question.
And before answering it, I would like to notice the source. I'll add Russia Today to my sources, sounds promising. But I have to question if the interview is from them, as the JDD (in french) claims it. Also the interview seems to date from 5 March, it helps to know the date.
Now, to show how difficult it is to adhere to the content, the colonel says that there has been no protest in Libya. It's a bit hard to believe. He does make some good points, especially when saying the international community reacted based on media reports - with the risk of being biased. But even the interviewer doubts his version, that the rebels would be lead by Al Quaïda (more or less).

There are other interests running in the Middle East, and if the coalition intervened it's fair to assume that they won't spend hundreds of millions - if not billions - to just help an enemy. You may have answered that question, what's the coalition's interest, a bit too hastily. As for what exact interests are running there, I won't pretend I know, I don't, and won't try to guess.

[Argurnenoni]

I agree, the last interview I saw was from a CIA "asset" that had been in Libya for a few months. He says a Arab nations have many unemployed men who sometimes link with Al Queda, not all share the same philosophy later, while of course some will. He does not see this as a terminal threat, more troubling is the lack of military training the rebels have.

[GalasaKoll]

I allowed myself to slightly modify your message in my quote, and took profit to turn your question into an actual question.
And before answering it, I would like to notice the source. I'll add Russia Today to my sources, sounds promising. But I have to question if the interview is from them, as the JDD (in french) claims it. Also the interview seems to date from 5 March, it helps to know the date.
Now, to show how difficult it is to adhere to the content, the colonel says that there has been no protest in Libya. It's a bit hard to believe. He does make some good points, especially when saying the international community reacted based on media reports - with the risk of being biased. But even the interviewer doubts his version, that the rebels would be lead by Al Quaïda (more or less).

There are other interests running in the Middle East, and if the coalition intervened it's fair to assume that they won't spend hundreds of millions - if not billions - to just help an enemy. You may have answered that question, what's the coalition's interest, a bit too hastily. As for what exact interests are running there, I won't pretend I know, I don't, and won't try to guess.

Maybe, they do not forward the Al-Quaida targeted. But it is not much better to accept that it profit from that. Al-Qiada and its linked organisations always profit from instable regions there...
I got the interview from here:
RIA Novosti
Its a good page, but I always save such rare information...

I think you're stealing Alma's schtick.

What are you talking about?

[neotheMit]

All bridges we may have had with Gaddaffi were burned when Obama said he had to go. If he survives he will be forever hostile to us.

There is no turning back.

[SteantyjetMaw]

What's he gonna do? Blow up a plane? Fund terrorism? You are right, though, like the pig in a ham and egg sandwich-we are committed. I think he is putting people on the ground right now so he can assess the situation better, he would like to use other countries, or the Arab league for a front before we give aid.