USA Economy ![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
How else do you justify your ramblings for deficits, printing from the Fed & higher taxes on the private sector & wealthy, for these jobs.
Federal Jobs | Uncle Sam shelling out big bucks for government jobs, GOP says time to cut | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment If you’re one of the millions of Americans still looking for a job, the federal government is hiring, and (especially for the unemployed) the pay is excellent. While private sector job growth creeps along at a snail’s pace, the roster of available federal jobs is booming. The Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs needs someone to run the Facebook page for the Dept. of the Interior and they’ll pay up to $115,000 a year. Over at the Dept. of Defense, they’ll drop nearly 50k a year for a new mail room clerk, plus the glorious benefits that comes with government work. In Washington, D.C., there are more than 1,000 openings this month alone. These include a “student internship” program at the Federal Housing Finance Agency that pays the equivalent of $48,304 a year; a $155,000-a-year gig at the Peace Corps to ensure the agency is complying with Equal Opportunity Employment standards; and a similar job at the Dept. of Transportation that promises nearly $180,000 a year. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
How else do you justify your ramblings for deficits, printing from the Fed & higher taxes on the private sector & wealthy, for these jobs. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I've never worked for any government ever. Always been in the private sector and I've worked in the F100.
I'm also a stockholder and a bondholder and I participate in the free markets. And I'm not a leftist/liberal, nor am I a SoCo. I'm not a heavy fiscal conservative because such a critter does not realistically exist, only hypothetically. I'm a pragmatist libertarian and have been for quite a long time. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
The fact is, most government bureaucrats and functionaries find ways to keep their departments' budgets healthy and fat and themselves employed. There is an awful lot of redundancy in government and any talk of "streamlining" government is just that...talk.
It has nothing to do with who loves their country more; what religion they practice or what their sexual orientation is. It's all about the dollars and maintaining their positions. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
The fact is, most government bureaucrats and functionaries find ways to keep their departments' budgets healthy and fat and themselves employed. There is an awful lot of redundancy in government and any talk of "streamlining" government is just that...talk. For instance, the budget preservation tendency; that's big-time prevalent in corporations. I've done budgets before and the motivation is obvious. If I don't use up all my budget allotment, does the rest get returned to me as a bonus? No, it is taken away and I get less in the next cycle by the bean counters in the CFO's office. Even worse, they may take away my open job postings if they see our workload decreasing, so there's also a tendency to "fill work" to preserve the body count. Middle management gets rewarded when they have more responsibility and one hidden sign of that is how many bodies report to you. The bigger the organization is, the more intense and rampant these behaviors are. Even the Googles of the world have some of this going on inside which you can't see unless you're a worker. The only difference between business and government is that it's easier to unload the chaff... usually. Some people though are unfireable; i.e. programmers who have very intense biz knowledge in a software company--those folks are difficult to replace without the company feeling pain, or very good salespeople who bring in a lot of bacon into a company. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
How else do you justify your ramblings for deficits, printing from the Fed & higher taxes on the private sector & wealthy, for these jobs.[/url] We could cut the entire Interior Department and it wouldn't put a dent in the deficit. Military spending, Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid: that's where the vast majority of federal revenues go. I favor cutting our hugely wasteful military spending by 50%. Once we've done that and saved taxpayers a fortune, I'm open to looking at cutting other entitlement spending as part of deficit reduction. Since the Republican leadership never puts on the table serious cuts to military spending, Social Security or Medicare then the Republican Party, and the people who vote for them must be Leftists too. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
The fact is, most government bureaucrats and functionaries find ways to keep their departments' budgets healthy and fat and themselves employed. There is an awful lot of redundancy in government and any talk of "streamlining" government is just that...talk. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
ftfy |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|