Reply to Thread New Thread |
06-05-2010, 05:24 AM | #22 |
|
You just can't tell this truthfully, can you? I am aware of the effect of the Schengen Accord, which is why I pointed out "until very recently." You didn't even know what Schengen was till I told you. P.S. They can still own "assault weapons." Let's see what happens with their crime rate. |
|
06-05-2010, 05:54 AM | #23 |
|
I don't really care where they get the guns anymore. The real problem is the overarching failure of the "war on drugs". Our government continues to throw money at the problem.....we could have easily taken that money and built a moat between the US and Mexico.....then filled it with sharks.....with laser beams of course! Im still for landmines....how do you say landmine in spanish? |
|
06-05-2010, 05:57 AM | #24 |
|
|
|
06-05-2010, 06:10 AM | #25 |
|
On a handful of occasions I've talked with guys who feel that the Swiss have the best method of controlling crime: mandate universal gun ownership and education so that any potential criminal is discouraged from the get-go. At least that's my take on how we Americans look at the Swiss situation. On the other hand, I've never really read about how the Swiss themselves view gun ownership and education. Is it that there are pockets of Swiss people itching to do something illegal, yet wary of their neighbors? Or is there something else in the Swiss history/culture that might also account for their low level of crime? I wonder how a substantial cross section of Swiss would explain this.
|
|
06-05-2010, 06:33 AM | #26 |
|
They sure do. I know a fair number of Swiss people. They are educated and don't generally expect handouts. I find the standard of living is better to a large degree too: Like many Europeans, they don't take a week's vacation a year, they take six. Even the blue-collar Swiss seem to be pretty well-educated too. The Swiss government (right now, kock on wood, never will) doesn't seem to have decided it has a need to micromanage people's lives.
Oddly enough, having heavily involved in the gun control thing for the better part of two decades, mostly gun control advocates have also pointed out to me that Switzerland's "advantage" is due to the virtual racial uniformity. |
|
07-04-2010, 12:41 PM | #27 |
|
|
|
07-04-2010, 05:01 PM | #28 |
|
I'm not sure what a "deficient culture" means-how do you quantify something like culture? Sounds awfully elitist to me. If you want to quantify it, look what it produces: In mexico's case, it's a barely literate population incapable of producing virtually anything, and is limited to mining oil and harvesting crops. It's a country wracked with corruption, crime, poverty, gangs and virtually every other social pathology. |
|
07-04-2010, 05:08 PM | #29 |
|
It's elitist in that some things are better than other things. |
|
07-04-2010, 05:57 PM | #32 |
|
On a handful of occasions I've talked with guys who feel that the Swiss have the best method of controlling crime: mandate universal gun ownership and education so that any potential criminal is discouraged from the get-go. At least that's my take on how we Americans look at the Swiss situation. On the other hand, I've never really read about how the Swiss themselves view gun ownership and education. Is it that there are pockets of Swiss people itching to do something illegal, yet wary of their neighbors? Or is there something else in the Swiss history/culture that might also account for their low level of crime? I wonder how a substantial cross section of Swiss would explain this. They clearly are not a warlike nation-unlike their European neighbors and the US. Might have something to do with the lack of crime. |
|
07-04-2010, 05:59 PM | #33 |
|
I guess you pass a law and try your best to implement and enforce it. I agree it's a tall order. But certainly the source of these cartels is the money derived from the drug trade. Cut that funding off. Unless you're going to make all (or virtually all) drugs legal and at low prices, there will still be cartels running drugs into the U.S. And, if we did make drugs legal at low prices (by not taxing them), do you think drug use would go up, or go down? Would that be a good thing or a bad thing. |
|
07-04-2010, 06:06 PM | #34 |
|
|
|
07-04-2010, 06:08 PM | #35 |
|
Since I haven't yet defined culture, what do you think my definition is? a barely literate population incapable of producing virtually anything, and is limited to mining oil and harvesting crops. It's a country wracked with corruption, crime, poverty, gangs and virtually every other social pathology. Maybe you want to take a stab at defining Mexico's deficient culture again if that's not what you mean. |
|
07-04-2010, 07:10 PM | #36 |
|
I can only go by what you've said: The conclusion you've drawn is akin to saying that the Ford Plant in Detroit IS a car, rather than it produces cars. Culture is a shared set of values, practices/traditions, societal norms, goals, and related factors. |
|
07-04-2010, 07:49 PM | #37 |
|
What I said was if you want to quantify a culture, look at what it produces. |
|
07-04-2010, 08:41 PM | #38 |
|
Right. So Mexico's culture is deficient. Thanks for clarifying. |
|
07-04-2010, 08:42 PM | #39 |
|
|
|
07-04-2010, 09:23 PM | #40 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (0 members and 10 guests) | |
|