LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-02-2007, 11:01 PM   #21
Fainnamoony

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!!

This has to be DEVASTATING to the bitch from NY and her Commie husband who built N.Korea up to destroy close Allies of America!!!

Mr Bush will possibly go down as the best ever, as soon as the new Iraq strategy pays off, and IT WILL!!

Now we need to keep all the Socialist-Progressive fucking Liberal traitors out of the picture and America will once again look GOOD!!!!!!
Got any details or links?

From what I've heard from the "Liberal Media" is that it (edit: the deal with N. Korea) is essentially the same thing Clinton had in place at the end of his term (yes that bitch's husband) which was ignored by Bush when he took office, at least until now.
Fainnamoony is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:10 PM   #22
crestosssa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
The whole "liberal media" thing is bullshit, too.
crestosssa is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:19 PM   #23
Thifiadardivy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default
Link, please. Otherwise this is just another pathetic excuse to gripe about the Clintons (not that a link here would make it un-pathetic).
Thifiadardivy is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:24 PM   #24
Gedominew

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!!

This has to be DEVASTATING to the bitch from NY and her Commie husband who built N.Korea up to destroy close Allies of America!!!

Mr Bush will possibly go down as the best ever, as soon as the new Iraq strategy pays off, and IT WILL!!

Now we need to keep all the Socialist-Progressive fucking Liberal traitors out of the picture and America will once again look GOOD!!!!!!
Ah to all you conservative neocon morons who simply can't make a post without using the word bitch when refering to one particular person. (hopefully that will get me out of the censor problem since no one in particular was mentioned) Read the fine print. It turns out this is not much more than was negotiated by that "bitches " husband. SO we have had 6 years of confrontation only to go back to what we already had in 1994 and it didn't work then either. Oh and this isn't my analysis. THis is the analysis of most of you m-r-ns favorite Ambassador (Bolton).
Gedominew is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:28 PM   #25
crestosssa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Since I.J. is just trolling, do you think it's ok to be off-topic in this thread? I'd like to know what Benjamin thinks about the post-Katrina rebuilding project.
Well, it's okay.

Post Katrina? I'm sad to admit that I have not studied the situation as closely as I should have, but there are some things are are clear to me, as I live near the area.

First, New Orleans will never be what it once was. The only thing that kept the city from being the Detroit of the south was the culture. That's pretty much gone, or at least pushed back irrevocably from pre-Katrina levels. I don't see it coming back.

Second, I think that the best hope of New Orleans might be the bulldozing of housing projects and the development of private land. I don't think that having thousands upon thousands of people living in a bowl without proper means of transportation is healthy. Simply put, ghetto culture needs to be de-emphasized. In these terms, I hope and pray New Orleans will not be as it once was.

~Ben
crestosssa is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:29 PM   #26
Fainnamoony

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
Ah to all you conservative neocon morons who simply can't make a post without using the word bitch when refering to one particular person. (hopefully that will get me out of the censor problem since no one in particular was mentioned) Read the fine print. It turns out this is not much more than was negotiated by that "bitches " husband. SO we have had 6 years of confrontation only to go back to what we already had in 1994 and it didn't work then either. Oh and this isn't my analysis. THis is the analysis of most of you m-r-ns favorite Ambassador (Bolton).
Thanks Gort, I forgot to mention that the Liberal Media source was an interview of Bolton. I laughed when I saw the OP after watching that.
Fainnamoony is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:53 PM   #27
RooldpalApata

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Well, it's okay.

Post Katrina? I'm sad to admit that I have not studied the situation as closely as I should have, but there are some things are are clear to me, as I live near the area.

First, New Orleans will never be what it once was. The only thing that kept the city from being the Detroit of the south was the culture. That's pretty much gone, or at least pushed back irrevocably from pre-Katrina levels. I don't see it coming back.

Second, I think that the best hope of New Orleans might be the bulldozing of housing projects and the development of private land. I don't think that having thousands upon thousands of people living in a bowl without proper means of transportation is healthy. Simply put, ghetto culture needs to be de-emphasized. In these terms, I hope and pray New Orleans will not be as it once was.

~Ben
I don't know if that's possible. Ragin did say he wants it to be a "chocolate city".
RooldpalApata is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:54 PM   #28
crestosssa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
I don't know if that's possible. Ragin did say he wants it to be a "chocolate city".
It's not so much a race thing as it is a culture and class issue.
crestosssa is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:55 PM   #29
Gedominew

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
Thanks Gort, I forgot to mention that the Liberal Media source was an interview of Bolton. I laughed when I saw the OP after watching that.
That will teach me to actually read the entire thread first. We posted almost the same thing. I just saw his BS and decided this guy needs to be taken down a peg or two. But in his defense he is more than likely from the bootheel of Missouri. There is old saying about that area. They can only have drivers ed two days a week, because they need the car for sex ed the rest of the time.
Gedominew is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:55 PM   #30
lzwha

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
As if NK will actually do anything meaningful. Seems like we get headlines like this several times per year.
lzwha is offline


Old 12-02-2007, 11:57 PM   #31
RooldpalApata

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
It's not so much a race thing as it is a culture and class issue.
Well, it's just that that type of attitude is glorified by "chocolate". Certainly that ghetto attitude is finally being purged, but as long as BET is around...
RooldpalApata is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 01:03 AM   #32
annouhMus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
621
Senior Member
Default
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!!

This has to be DEVASTATING to the bitch from NY and her Commie husband who built N.Korea up to destroy close Allies of America!!!

Mr Bush will possibly go down as the best ever, as soon as the new Iraq strategy pays off, and IT WILL!!

Now we need to keep all the Socialist-Progressive fucking Liberal traitors out of the picture and America will once again look GOOD!!!!!!
Just keep whistling in the dark, that way we will know where you are so we can send you a flashlight.
annouhMus is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 01:11 AM   #33
24MurinivaMak

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Why can't we talk to Iran this way and get some kind of deal?
24MurinivaMak is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 01:30 AM   #34
accotMask17

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
333
Senior Member
Default
Why can't we talk to Iran this way and get some kind of deal?
Because George and Dick have already made up their minds about what they will do to Iran.

Andrew
accotMask17 is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 02:42 AM   #35
RilmAlime67

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!!

This has to be DEVASTATING to the bitch from NY and her Commie husband who built N.Korea up to destroy close Allies of America!!!

Mr Bush will possibly go down as the best ever, as soon as the new Iraq strategy pays off, and IT WILL!!

Now we need to keep all the Socialist-Progressive fucking Liberal traitors out of the picture and America will once again look GOOD!!!!!!
STOP! You made me laugh so hard I pissed myself.

The only thing GW will go down as the best ever of, is fucking up the entire world.

Bush didn't broker this latest deal with North Korea, it was done as part of the SIX PARTY TALKS with four other nations. Hardly something George Bush deserves credit for, after all Bush refused to talk with North Korea outside of the Six Party Talks.

And the irony is that this deal is something that Clinton sought congressional approval for during his administration. Just think, if the Republican't congress had just seen the wisdom of William Jefferson Clinton back in the day, North Korea might not have even had a nuclear weapons program today.

Oh but you probably don't understand irony.

Oh and an interesting twist on this story, GW's darling, former UN-envoy John Bolton wants Bush to reject the deal.

"I'm hoping that the president has not been fully briefed on it and he still has time to reject it," he said. I'm troubled by this quote from Bolton; he hopes the president hasn't been fully briefed on the deal, so he can reject it? That sounds ridiculous, what's Bolton afraid of, the president making an informed decision? That would be a first.

Oh and in what context do you mean "new Iraq strategy pays off"? Because if you're Halliburton the old Iraq strategy is paying pretty good, and when you look at the "new" Iraq strategy, it doesn't look much different than the old one.
RilmAlime67 is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 02:44 AM   #36
RilmAlime67

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Why can't we talk to Iran this way and get some kind of deal?
We can, but Cheney wants war with Iran, and what Cheney wants, George does.
RilmAlime67 is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 03:13 AM   #37
AAAESLLESO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!!

This has to be DEVASTATING to the bitch from NY and her Commie husband who built N.Korea up to destroy close Allies of America!!!

Mr Bush will possibly go down as the best ever, as soon as the new Iraq strategy pays off, and IT WILL!!

Now we need to keep all the Socialist-Progressive fucking Liberal traitors out of the picture and America will once again look GOOD!!!!!!


Bill Clinton is not a communist.
AAAESLLESO is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 03:45 AM   #38
YpbWF5Yo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Why can't we talk to Iran this way and get some kind of deal?
Because Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb as North Korea does .. which is why Iran wants to get one.

North Korea has proven that you don't have to have 5,000 nuclear bombs .. all you need is one .. and you get diplomacy, while those who don't have one get attacked.
YpbWF5Yo is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 04:03 AM   #39
YpbWF5Yo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
These right-wingers are scrapping the barrel for good news.

First, it wasn't Bush or Rice who brokered this deal, it was Bill Clinton .. and the Chinese .. and the Russians ... and the South Koreans .. and the Japanese .. and the Germans.

Secondly, Cowboy Bush has been forced to bend over and have the US talk directly with North Korea, which the rest of the world said he should do, and Bush said he would never do ..

The current talks began Thursday on a promising note after the United States and North Korea held an unusual meeting last month in Germany and signaled a willingness to compromise. YET, before the 1994 Clinton-brokered deal can be signed, the right-wingers are jumping on it as if Bush had his way with North Korea.

Incredible .. but I most certainly understand why the right is scrapping for crumbs .. off Bill Clinton's table.

This is just too dumb, too funny.
YpbWF5Yo is offline


Old 12-03-2007, 07:04 AM   #40
lymnCymment

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
American role in that is minimal...

It is Russia and China that give fuel to North Korea in exchange for denucleorisation of N.Korea.

America's part is... ahem... in unfreezing part of money that belong to N. Korea.

America's behavior once again is the behavior of a thief that return a part of stolen.

Once again you can see by your own eyes who works for the stabilization in the world and who just returns the part of what have been stolen.
lymnCymment is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 17 (0 members and 17 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity