Reply to Thread New Thread |
12-02-2007, 11:01 PM | #21 |
|
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!! From what I've heard from the "Liberal Media" is that it (edit: the deal with N. Korea) is essentially the same thing Clinton had in place at the end of his term (yes that bitch's husband) which was ignored by Bush when he took office, at least until now. |
|
12-02-2007, 11:10 PM | #22 |
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 11:19 PM | #23 |
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 11:24 PM | #24 |
|
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!! |
|
12-02-2007, 11:28 PM | #25 |
|
Since I.J. is just trolling, do you think it's ok to be off-topic in this thread? I'd like to know what Benjamin thinks about the post-Katrina rebuilding project. Post Katrina? I'm sad to admit that I have not studied the situation as closely as I should have, but there are some things are are clear to me, as I live near the area. First, New Orleans will never be what it once was. The only thing that kept the city from being the Detroit of the south was the culture. That's pretty much gone, or at least pushed back irrevocably from pre-Katrina levels. I don't see it coming back. Second, I think that the best hope of New Orleans might be the bulldozing of housing projects and the development of private land. I don't think that having thousands upon thousands of people living in a bowl without proper means of transportation is healthy. Simply put, ghetto culture needs to be de-emphasized. In these terms, I hope and pray New Orleans will not be as it once was. ~Ben |
|
12-02-2007, 11:29 PM | #26 |
|
Ah to all you conservative neocon morons who simply can't make a post without using the word bitch when refering to one particular person. (hopefully that will get me out of the censor problem since no one in particular was mentioned) Read the fine print. It turns out this is not much more than was negotiated by that "bitches " husband. SO we have had 6 years of confrontation only to go back to what we already had in 1994 and it didn't work then either. Oh and this isn't my analysis. THis is the analysis of most of you m-r-ns favorite Ambassador (Bolton). |
|
12-02-2007, 11:53 PM | #27 |
|
Well, it's okay. |
|
12-02-2007, 11:54 PM | #28 |
|
|
|
12-02-2007, 11:55 PM | #29 |
|
Thanks Gort, I forgot to mention that the Liberal Media source was an interview of Bolton. I laughed when I saw the OP after watching that. |
|
12-02-2007, 11:57 PM | #31 |
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 01:03 AM | #32 |
|
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!! |
|
12-03-2007, 01:11 AM | #33 |
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 01:30 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 02:42 AM | #35 |
|
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!! The only thing GW will go down as the best ever of, is fucking up the entire world. Bush didn't broker this latest deal with North Korea, it was done as part of the SIX PARTY TALKS with four other nations. Hardly something George Bush deserves credit for, after all Bush refused to talk with North Korea outside of the Six Party Talks. And the irony is that this deal is something that Clinton sought congressional approval for during his administration. Just think, if the Republican't congress had just seen the wisdom of William Jefferson Clinton back in the day, North Korea might not have even had a nuclear weapons program today. Oh but you probably don't understand irony. Oh and an interesting twist on this story, GW's darling, former UN-envoy John Bolton wants Bush to reject the deal. "I'm hoping that the president has not been fully briefed on it and he still has time to reject it," he said. I'm troubled by this quote from Bolton; he hopes the president hasn't been fully briefed on the deal, so he can reject it? That sounds ridiculous, what's Bolton afraid of, the president making an informed decision? That would be a first. Oh and in what context do you mean "new Iraq strategy pays off"? Because if you're Halliburton the old Iraq strategy is paying pretty good, and when you look at the "new" Iraq strategy, it doesn't look much different than the old one. |
|
12-03-2007, 02:44 AM | #36 |
|
|
|
12-03-2007, 03:13 AM | #37 |
|
Breaking news that the Major Liberal Media "mentioned", that N.Korea may be ready to give up their Nuclear ambitions!! Bill Clinton is not a communist. |
|
12-03-2007, 03:45 AM | #38 |
|
Why can't we talk to Iran this way and get some kind of deal? North Korea has proven that you don't have to have 5,000 nuclear bombs .. all you need is one .. and you get diplomacy, while those who don't have one get attacked. |
|
12-03-2007, 04:03 AM | #39 |
|
These right-wingers are scrapping the barrel for good news.
First, it wasn't Bush or Rice who brokered this deal, it was Bill Clinton .. and the Chinese .. and the Russians ... and the South Koreans .. and the Japanese .. and the Germans. Secondly, Cowboy Bush has been forced to bend over and have the US talk directly with North Korea, which the rest of the world said he should do, and Bush said he would never do .. The current talks began Thursday on a promising note after the United States and North Korea held an unusual meeting last month in Germany and signaled a willingness to compromise. YET, before the 1994 Clinton-brokered deal can be signed, the right-wingers are jumping on it as if Bush had his way with North Korea. Incredible .. but I most certainly understand why the right is scrapping for crumbs .. off Bill Clinton's table. This is just too dumb, too funny. |
|
12-03-2007, 07:04 AM | #40 |
|
American role in that is minimal...
It is Russia and China that give fuel to North Korea in exchange for denucleorisation of N.Korea. America's part is... ahem... in unfreezing part of money that belong to N. Korea. America's behavior once again is the behavior of a thief that return a part of stolen. Once again you can see by your own eyes who works for the stabilization in the world and who just returns the part of what have been stolen. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 21 (0 members and 21 guests) | |
|