LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-23-2007, 10:20 AM   #21
LsrSRVxR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
Default
Israel should take over Palenstine and start having the military patrol the streets.Any palestine who refuses to cooperate with Israel authorities just shoot him.And Isreal should handle terrorist all over the world.The US give more military aid to israel and trade tech secrets so they can fight terrorist without having the UN involved. Cause Liberals will always make the US military obey the UN.Just like Clinton went in Kosovo because of the UN told Bill Clinton to attack Kosovo and NOT ONE LIBERAL LASHED OUT ON BILL CLINTON WHEN A US SOLDIER DIES IN COMBAT!! But when George Bush does it all these liberals cry,, cry,, cry,,, whine,,, whine,,, and whine about it. Plus they Bitch and Moan about US soldiers dying. So i say lets Negotiate with Isreal Taking over IRAQ as Americans pull out and lets see how Al Queda can deal with the Isreal Military.
Steve are you thinking before quoting?
Assume the Israelis have control, their first mission would be to wipe out Palestine. They will be ideal targets for the rest of the middle east.
You CANNOT disregard the UN and share supremacy over the world between the US and Israel. That is daydreaming, that is outright sacrifice to WWIII.
Israel and The US, trade tech secrets? What is tech is already out there, intelligence agencies have already pissed on trees in their territories - you need them first.
It it the current Administration at that time who is responsible for maintaining and contributing to UN requirements. Kosovo was riddled with war crimes and as part of the UN America contributed in dispersing it.
Do yourself a favor, don't join any of the forces unless you want to clean latrines.
LsrSRVxR is offline


Old 02-23-2007, 06:14 PM   #22
egoldhyip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Kosovo was commiting war crimes yeah but they werent a threat to america. So its europes problem not our problem. So why should we help europe out when france vetoes the US not to go to war against IRAQ?
egoldhyip is offline


Old 02-24-2007, 07:55 AM   #23
LsrSRVxR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
Default
Kosovo was commiting war crimes yeah but they werent a threat to america. So its europes problem not our problem. So why should we help europe out when france vetoes the US not to go to war against IRAQ?
Your timeliness are mixed again. France's veto was years after the Kosovo war you have no argument.

If you are implying that, America should not of taken part in the Kosovo war because America was not threatened in any way,
and therefore Europe should handle it's own problems;

You should first ask yourself although France vetoed and the UN discouraged any aggression, why on earth did America challenge the UN charter - chapters 41 & 42 as members and see it fit to attack Iraq, although Iraq couldn't possibly threat America with military or nuclear force and that the UN council claimed the aggression as illegal.

So please do tell me, WHY DID AMERICA ATTACK IRAQ who had a boyscout army.
LsrSRVxR is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity