Reply to Thread New Thread |
02-16-2007, 05:12 PM | #21 |
|
You guys believe in the third option ? :lol One thing about conspiracy theorists, they have no problem telling you how stupid Bush and Co. is, yet they also have no problem with the extreme organizational skill of the many people it would have taken to really pull off the events of 9/11. So, which is it? Is the Bush administration really as dumb as everyone says, or are they the masterminds your theories make them out to be? For every good point you have in any conspiracy theory, I bet I can raise 10 other good points to counter them. It only takes but a moment's thought. Edit - Jessie, I am new here and I am not meaning to pick on you. It's just that I've heard many "solid" theories that weren't nearly as solid as their purporters claimed. I am sure discussions about many conspiracy theories has occurred here that I am unaware of, but I'd be happy to hear yours if you can point me to it and I am willing to discuss if you'd like. |
|
02-16-2007, 05:17 PM | #22 |
|
It wouldn't seem so primitive if a boxcutter was tearing through your neck, would it? Please, even a spoon could be a deadly weapon in the hands of someone with skill. A razor-sharp edge is hardly "primitive." you are dead on ....the admin is a bunch of "monkeys" but they could pull this off? |
|
02-16-2007, 06:22 PM | #24 |
|
See what Brave people can do to Hijackers? Im not trying to be a smartass,,But americans just dont wanna get involved or fight back when hijackers hijack our planes on 9-11. And when a crinimal enters your house or near your car they dont wanna fight back.They just do what he says and try to survive.What if those passengers or crew did something about it on 9-11? The WTC would been still standing and 3000 people would be still alive and we wouldnt be at war today.And Liberal Democrats dont want pilots carrying guns into the cockpit and i do.So much for african airport security i hope those officers face disaplinery action.
|
|
02-16-2007, 06:33 PM | #25 |
|
See what Brave people can do to Hijackers? Im not trying to be a smartass,,But americans just dont wanna get involved or fight back when hijackers hijack our planes on 9-11. And when a crinimal enters your house or near your car they dont wanna fight back.They just do what he says and try to survive.What if those passengers or crew did something about it on 9-11? The WTC would been still standing and 3000 people would be still alive and we wouldnt be at war today.And Liberal Democrats dont want pilots carrying guns into the cockpit and i do.So much for african airport security i hope those officers face disaplinery action. What the??? Americans are not afraid, they're programmed. They think that the system will always save them because every day they have food on their plate, cash to burn, jobs to go to, doctors to tend to their ills and boo boos, schools to teach their children, police to fight crime...there isn't much they have to really worry about. Quite specifically, the people on those planes were told what to do and they did it (save for one instance of 4) because thats what they do every day. So yeah...check your bag and your brain at the curb... you won't be needing them today, the pilot has a gun. |
|
02-16-2007, 07:02 PM | #26 |
|
|
|
02-16-2007, 07:05 PM | #27 |
|
If the Pilot had a gun the stewartness can alert the pilot on the phone when the hijacker is near the cockpit door and then the pilot has a gun opens the door and then the hijacker gets shot. Now THERES an idea. |
|
02-16-2007, 07:20 PM | #28 |
|
|
|
02-16-2007, 07:25 PM | #30 |
|
Then if hijacker goes to court some liberal judge will give him 60 days in jail. You chace your problems like you're trying to put your finger on mercury. |
|
02-16-2007, 07:45 PM | #31 |
|
If that happens then he was either innocent or the criminal justice system is failing. That is neither to do with liberalism, cowardice, or arming pilots. |
|
02-16-2007, 07:48 PM | #32 |
|
Yes it does.Cause its the stupidty of the voters who voted for liberals in office and your elected officals appoint a liberal judge to the court.Just look at Bill Clinton for example. I'm beginning to understand your logic and I take it all back. You're right. Indeed, we should all be brave and intelligent just like you and allow someone else to forever take care of our every whim. |
|
02-16-2007, 07:53 PM | #33 |
|
So now Americans are both cowards and stupid. Might I assume that you somehow exempt yourself? |
|
02-16-2007, 08:47 PM | #35 |
|
Which proves that 911 was an inside job. I cannot and will not believe that American's who were inside our hijacked planes were ball-less, spineless, weaklings. B> DUH 911 was an inside job C> Try me on the whole spineless thing. When my hands touch your next you'll feel a grip. |
|
02-16-2007, 08:49 PM | #36 |
|
The people in the planes on 9/11 were not cowards. The whole notion before 9/11 in hijack situations were to do as told. The hijackers showed they meant business by killing a member or two of the crew. The purpose of this was to quell the thinking of any would-be hero. Give them what they want, and when the plane lands try to talk them out or kill them. That was pretty much the plan pre-9/11.
Nowadays you have to be dumb to try and hijack a plane. You may just get hot water on your crotch! |
|
02-16-2007, 08:52 PM | #37 |
|
...And Liberal Democrats dont want pilots carrying guns into the cockpit and i do.So much for african airport security i hope those officers face disaplinery action. If the Pilot had a gun the stewartness can alert the pilot on the phone when the hijacker is near the cockpit door and then the pilot has a gun opens the door and then the hijacker gets shot. To get to the cockpit he would have had to get through the door. Had the passengers not acted because the pilot had a gun, the pilot would have had to abandon the cockpit (presumably through the door and not out the window onto the fueselage outside ), leaving one pilot in the cockpit to fly the plane to go shoot a terrorist amongst a plane full of passengers and the cockpit door open. OK. I'm finished. |
|
02-16-2007, 10:06 PM | #38 |
|
Sorry, there is no evidence that the 4 planes in 911 were hi-jacked. There were no such names in the passenger lists and no unknown bodyparts found by the pathologists - there is no any evidence on arabs involved (only for a showcase). Those Boeing models have a anti-hi-jacking system which makes it possible to control the planes only from the ground (which was really used to steer them to their target buildings). There were no h-j alarms from the pilots (easy to push a button). Cheney's five war-games was a meant to cover the show.
Unfortunately, 911 was a theatre which was necessary because the Americans were not ready to pay the Middle East war. It was a copy from Pearl Harbor which was neccessary to put the Americans to accept and pay the European war. |
|
02-17-2007, 12:15 AM | #39 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|