Reply to Thread New Thread |
02-16-2007, 12:13 PM | #1 |
|
Feds Hit 21 with Probe of Nevada Pol, ABC News, Feb. 15, 2007:
The number of investigations into lawmakers from the 109th Congress has grown to 21. Jim Gibbons, the newly-elected Republican governor of Nevada, is facing a federal investigation for suspicions of criminal behavior while he was a member of Congress, according to a Wall Street Journal report today. The probe would make Gibbons, who left Congress last fall, the fourth member of the former House Intelligence Committee to come under such scrutiny. Twenty-one members of the 109th Congress investigated for one type of crime or another. That's amazing. And four just from the House Intelligence Committee! I guess that intelligence is worth a pretty penny, eh? And here I was, thinking that the 109th Congress was the biggest do-nothing Congress in history! Guess I was really wrong about that!! |
|
02-16-2007, 12:18 PM | #2 |
|
Although I'm a liberal, I'm fair enough to admit that as long as powerful jobs are there, some people will take advantage, no matter their political affiliations. What was really "flip-floppy" about the 109th Congress was that they were governed by people who drapped themselves in all things virtuous. The hypocrisy was so thick.
|
|
02-16-2007, 12:32 PM | #5 |
|
Although I'm a liberal, I'm fair enough to admit that as long as powerful jobs are there, some people will take advantage, no matter their political affiliations. Also, I don't know how many of the 21 are Republicans and how many are Democrats. What was really "flip-floppy" about the 109th Congress was that they were governed by people who drapped themselves in all things virtuous. The hypocrisy was so thick. |
|
02-16-2007, 12:42 PM | #9 |
|
No, I don't believe in assigning more blame to one party, but I do understand that it's popular for people to do that. In the case of the federal gov't over the last 6 years, I've leaned in on them a lot, mostly the Republicans, because they actually go out there and pretend to be "better people" than the rest of us. Their campaigns are endlessly about "moral values" that they don't follow themselves. Democrats at least don't pretend to do that. It's easy if you're a Republican, to just go out there and say, "I'm pro-life, abortion is murder, case closed" than to say, "I encourage birth instead of abortion but I won't suppress my citizens' freedoms, so I'm pro-choice, women shouldn't be forced to go underground because that would cause class-warfare, teens ought to be given all the information necessary about sex because "just say no" is naive, condescending, ignorant and not practical".
|
|
02-16-2007, 01:30 PM | #10 |
|
Although I'm a liberal, I'm fair enough to admit that as long as powerful jobs are there, some people will take advantage, no matter their political affiliations. What was really "flip-floppy" about the 109th Congress was that they were governed by people who drapped themselves in all things virtuous. The hypocrisy was so thick. |
|
02-16-2007, 02:16 PM | #11 |
|
Well, you have Sen Ted Kennedy, Sen Byrd, and a Sen Clinton to add in that mix too, don't you think? I know Clinton had her law practice ripped inside out, yet nothing stuck. Seemed a bit of a witch-hunt. But was she ever indicted? I'm not sure it's fair to throw Byrd & Clinton (unindicted as far as I know) into the mix w/21 people who HAVE in fact been indicted. But I'll grant you Kennedy. Drunken lout. |
|
02-16-2007, 02:26 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
02-16-2007, 02:32 PM | #13 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|