Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-20-2007, 10:43 PM | #21 |
|
Our government is so oppressive. I wish I could live in another country that doesn't make people pay any taxes. I'm going to look into finding one and get back to you guys. I'm about sick of all of these pesky roads and courts to stop criminal behavior. So annoying. And this damn military. It's not like we will ever be attacked.
|
|
01-20-2007, 11:33 PM | #22 |
|
Not really. He's saying that we can't look at other problems while we have some really big ones already. This isn't the first time that line's been used though. It's really a stupid argument because he's said "what we're most worried about is the income tax." Nobody said that income tax is our biggest worry, it's just another topic to discuss! |
|
01-20-2007, 11:36 PM | #23 |
|
massive taxation and manipulation of the US monetary system are major problems. to make things worse, we're virtually powerless to do anything to change it and its quite complicated (at least for me). i mean, trying to understand how the fed manipulates our currency is quite a challenge. for example, i'm still trying to understand why the fed. reserve has stopped listing the M3 money supply figures. from the economics articles i've read they believe its because the M3 figures would give people a clearer picture of our nations financial situation. so basically the government collects your money and also controls and manipulates the value of that money, neither of which everyday citizens can do anything about. matter of fact, only a couple of congressmen made a stink about it and are attempting to have the decision reversed. i guess my point is that even though this guy is taking a stand against oppressive government practices, i'm doubtful it'll change anything. but you never know.
|
|
01-20-2007, 11:42 PM | #24 |
|
massive taxation and manipulation of the US monetary system are major problems. to make things worse, we're virtually powerless to do anything to change it and its quite complicated (at least for me). i mean, trying to understand how the fed manipulates our currency is quite a challenge. for example, i'm still trying to understand why the fed. reserve has stopped listing the M3 money supply figures. from the economics articles i've read they believe its because the M3 figures would give people a clearer picture of our nations financial situation. so basically the government collects your money and also controls and manipulates the value of that money, neither of which everyday citizens can do anything about. matter of fact, only a couple of congressmen made a stink about it and are attempting to have the decision reversed. i guess my point is that even though this guy is taking a stand against oppressive government practices, i'm doubtful it'll change anything. but you never know. |
|
01-20-2007, 11:44 PM | #25 |
|
Greetings and Felicitations,
I believe that is the defense the NH man is using, that there actually is no law that says we have to pay it. I don't know what his sources are for this, however. Sincerely Yours, C. David Neely |
|
01-20-2007, 11:47 PM | #26 |
|
Say what you want about this man, but he is doing exactly what more Americans should do, but which 99% of are too afraid to. He is standing up to an oppressive government. Yes, I am talking about the U.S. Government. Andrew |
|
01-20-2007, 11:57 PM | #27 |
|
Greetings and Felicitations, |
|
01-21-2007, 12:55 AM | #29 |
|
Say what you want about this man, but he is doing exactly what more Americans should do, but which 99% of are too afraid to. He is standing up to an oppressive government. Yes, I am talking about the U.S. Government. As for the argument about the 16th Amendment never being properly ratified, "Some assert that the collection of federal income taxes constitutes a “taking” of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Thus, any attempt by the Internal Revenue Service to collect federal income taxes owed by a taxpayer is unconstitutional. The Law: The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that a person shall not be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .” The U.S. Supreme Court stated in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., 240 U.S. 1, 24 (1916), that “it is . . . well settled that [the Fifth Amendment] is not a limitation upon the taxing power conferred upon Congress by the Constitution; in other words, that the Constitution does not conflict with itself by conferring upon the one hand a taxing power, and taking the same power away on the other by limitations of the due process clause.” Further, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the summary administrative procedures contained in the Internal Revenue Code against due process challenges, on the basis that a post-collection remedy (e.g., a tax refund suit) exists and is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of constitutional due process. Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589, 595-97 (1931). The Internal Revenue Code provides methods to ensure due process to taxpayers: (1) the “refund method,” set forth in section 7422(e) and 28 U.S.C. '' 1341 and 1346(a), where a taxpayer must pay the full amount of the tax and then sue in a federal district court or in the United States Court of Federal Claims for a refund; and (2) the “deficiency method,” set forth in section 6213(a), where a taxpayer may, without paying the contested tax, petition the United States Tax Court to redetermine a tax deficiency asserted by the IRS. Courts have found that both methods provide constitutional due process. The IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2005-19, 2005-1 C.B. 819, which discusses this frivolous argument in more detail, warning taxpayers of the consequences of attempting to pursue a claim on these grounds. Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145, 175 (1960) – the United States Supreme Court held that a taxpayer must pay the full tax assessment before being able to file a refund suit in district court, noting that a person has the right to appeal an assessment to the Tax Court 'without paying a cent.' Schiff v. United States, 919 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1990) – the court rejected a due process claim where the taxpayer chose not to avail himself of the opportunity to appeal a deficiency notice to the Tax Court." |
|
01-21-2007, 01:05 AM | #30 |
|
Greetings and Felicitations, |
|
01-21-2007, 01:18 AM | #31 |
|
Our government is so oppressive. I wish I could live in another country that doesn't make people pay any taxes. I'm going to look into finding one and get back to you guys. I'm about sick of all of these pesky roads and courts to stop criminal behavior. So annoying. And this damn military. It's not like we will ever be attacked. Oh wait, actually the Iraq war is being paid for by loans from China, it's not even in the budget. I guess we can pay for that without taxes after all. But then again, who would lend our country anymore money for the war if our country has no income? |
|
01-21-2007, 01:32 AM | #32 |
|
Say what you want about this man, but he is doing exactly what more Americans should do, but which 99% of are too afraid to. He is standing up to an oppressive government. Yes, I am talking about the U.S. Government. If he was a nigger he would already be dead. Also, the logic behind the 16th amendment is contrary to the ennumeration clause. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. |
|
01-21-2007, 01:35 AM | #33 |
|
Aren't those taxes used in part to pay the soldiers and the war you support? So much for supporting the troops. And I noticed that all the folks who are cheering this guy on to not pay his taxes, kinda went away after you smarties pointed out that we can't pay for the war or anything else our great country offers without taxes. I am not the least bit surprised you guys are defending a system that confiscates people's property and destroys their lives. None of you have taken a position in the past in any other thread that even remotely stands up for individual freedom and responsibility. And to address your extrapolative, sarcastic comments regarding how the war is paid for, we are only talking about the INCOME TAX. Not ALL taxes. There are plenty of other income sources the Federal Government receives in the form of excise taxes, tariffs, etc. But I don't want to ask too much of you. Please, don't try and make legitimate arguments to defend the system. Just keep making snide and overly exaggerated comments. Really, we're all impressed. |
|
01-21-2007, 01:39 AM | #34 |
|
No Comrade Samantha, what you noticed is that we all have lives and can't sit in front of the computer responding to you immediately. |
|
01-21-2007, 01:43 AM | #35 |
|
So this guy thinks there is no law requiring payment of income tax?
Well he has been convicted of tax evasion so at least one judge thinks there is a law which compels payment. The obvious solution to this man's problem is to appeal the conviction. Surely if there is no law requiring that he pay income tax then he should be able to find a lawyer to file his appeal and a judge to hear it. Of course the lawyer might be dissuaded by the fact that such screwball arguments have been repeatedly laughed out of court. |
|
01-21-2007, 01:55 AM | #36 |
|
No matter what forms taxes come in they are still taking a part of each of our wealth in order to have services that hold civilized society together. I think the main point of the income tax is so that people do not hide their wealth or income and pay their share. On the contrary, the form of the taxes is quite relevant as mentioned in Article 1. Section 9 of the Constitution: No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken Also, if you have ever read the Federalist Papers you would know that the authors sternly warned on how taxing people's labor would be disastrous for the country. |
|
01-21-2007, 01:55 AM | #37 |
|
So you don't think anything can be done democratically? What would you propose? Armed rebellion? |
|
01-21-2007, 02:01 AM | #38 |
|
Pay their fair share of what? Socialist entitlement programs that give handouts to people who don't their own keep? Their fair share of what the Federal Government has no business being involved in? Paying their fare share into a controlling system that rips people out of their homes at gun point and destroys their lives if they don't? |
|
01-21-2007, 02:07 AM | #39 |
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 02:16 AM | #40 |
|
It takes a real fucking goofball to spin a thread about a NH man who has a tax beef with the US gov't into some pathetic bullshit about Iraq. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | |
|