Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-01-2007, 08:58 PM | #21 |
|
Breaking News??? |
|
04-01-2007, 09:05 PM | #22 |
|
Where's the link on that??? But that only talks about legal immigrants..there are/have been foreigners in the US military for years (and other countries do as well, for instance their are Americans serving in Australian military, British military and others) |
|
04-01-2007, 10:36 PM | #23 |
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 12:44 AM | #24 |
|
A U.S. military 'at its breaking point' considers foreign recruits - Americas - International Herald Tribune and this is "weaker than a nickle pack of koolaide in the ocean" No color NO Smell NO TASTE |
|
04-02-2007, 03:06 AM | #26 |
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 03:08 AM | #27 |
|
|
|
04-02-2007, 04:57 AM | #28 |
|
|
|
05-01-2007, 02:18 PM | #29 |
|
I think it would be an idea worth looking into. If someone living here wants citizenship and they are willing to actually go fight for our country, then anti-immigration bigots and leftists would be hard-pressed to come up with excuses to deny them citizenship. |
|
05-01-2007, 02:20 PM | #30 |
|
Hey don't destroy Goober's SPIN and half-truths as it effects his Liberal status with other wussies! |
|
05-01-2007, 03:29 PM | #31 |
|
the 100,000 is based on memory - I did find this: U.S. Citizenship for Military Personnel (QUOTE) Right now every branch except the Army has MORE applicants than they need soldiers for...in other words every branch except the Army is TURNING PEOPLE AWAY. |
|
05-01-2007, 03:40 PM | #32 |
|
A U.S. military 'at its breaking point' considers foreign recruits - Americas - International Herald Tribune Moonbats expose themselves more everyday with this unbelievable crap… |
|
05-01-2007, 10:41 PM | #33 |
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 05:59 PM | #34 |
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 11:06 PM | #35 |
|
Excercise in reality: summate number of Native American extract servicepeople and subtract from total service populus. What remains is immigrant servicemen and women in the US Armed forces. As some people have already alluded to, the semantics revolve around the legality of their status. I personally suggest that this is better approached when it can be assured that they manage to return back to this country on the second occassion, rather than arrive on the first.
|
|
12-01-2007, 11:15 PM | #36 |
|
Excercise in reality: summate number of Native American extract servicepeople and subtarct from total service populus. What remains is immigrant servicemen and women in the US Armed forces. As some people have already alluded to, the semantics revolve around the legality of there status. I personally suggest that this is better approached when it can be assured that they manage to return back to this country on the second occassion, rather than arrive on the first. |
|
12-01-2007, 11:32 PM | #37 |
|
I am sorry. My grammar, syntax and spelling is atrocoious. It' simple really. The USA has a reputation of being built almost exclusively upon an immigrant population. As this is still propounded today, it would be wrong to say that the US Armed forces was recruiting outside its borders (if this is true), for it has no borders - other than physical ones.
The point is, for a nation built in its entirety not upon hereditary influences, but upon an ethos, it really is no import that recruits to serve in the US military come from outside, especially when there has never been an inside. If it is still required to address whethere these lucky volunteers have a permanent future in the US, would it not be more appropriate to let them serve and see if they come back alive first? |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|