LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-06-2011, 07:26 PM   #21
new-nickname-zanovo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
Abortion, in the case of rape and/or incest, should never, ever be denied and, as much as I don't want to see federal funds being used to provide abortions for women who simply get pregnant during recreational sex, I would support them being used in cases of rape and/or incest...
I actually don't understand why (much of) the anti-abortion crowd makes an exemption for cases of rape and incest. Either abortion is murder, or it isn't; either a fetus has a right to live, or it doesn't.
new-nickname-zanovo is offline


Old 12-06-2011, 09:50 PM   #22
Yinekol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
Where on earth did you hear that?
Am I wrong? Do you not believe a woman should be able to kill her unborn baby is she wants to cause she will get fat?
Yinekol is offline


Old 12-06-2011, 10:06 PM   #23
wmhardware

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
Am I wrong? Do you not believe a woman should be able to kill her unborn baby is she wants to cause she will get fat?
That wasn't my question, my opinion on the subject is irrelevant.

I want to know where you came up with the idea that abortion is somehow about how a woman looks.
wmhardware is offline


Old 12-06-2011, 10:12 PM   #24
Yinekol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
That wasn't my question, my opinion on the subject is irrelevant.

I want to know where you came up with the idea that abortion is somehow about how a woman looks.
it is a reason they use
Yinekol is offline


Old 12-06-2011, 10:16 PM   #25
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
it is a reason they use
Can you link to something which supports your claim, or did you just expect is to accept what you say as fact...
eskimosik is offline


Old 12-06-2011, 10:19 PM   #26
wmhardware

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
it is a reason they use
I have to second Steve's call for sources, methinks you made it up.
wmhardware is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 12:57 AM   #27
Ikhqgvas

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
I actually don't understand why (much of) the anti-abortion crowd makes an exemption for cases of rape and incest. Either abortion is murder, or it isn't; either a fetus has a right to live, or it doesn't.
They make an exemption because the women never agreed to it so she shouldn't have to give birth and raise the child.
Ikhqgvas is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 01:01 AM   #28
Ikhqgvas

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
How sick are we that people think a woman being able to kill a baby cause she might look fat is a right.
Or women who get abortions just don't want to take responsibility for there actions.
Ikhqgvas is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 01:34 AM   #29
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
They make an exemption because the women never agreed to it so she shouldn't have to give birth and raise the child.
But, as was pointed out, it's still condoning murder.

Anyone who makes such exceptions is pro-choice.

Period.
eskimosik is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 01:37 AM   #30
gusecrync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
If you want to save a child from abortion then go to one of the many agencies that arrange for the adoption of children from mothers planning abortions, otherwise, shut up, as it's not your body and you truly have no right to have an opinion, one way or the other.
gusecrync is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 02:11 AM   #31
feannigvogten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
I actually don't understand why (much of) the anti-abortion crowd makes an exemption for cases of rape and incest. Either abortion is murder, or it isn't; either a fetus has a right to live, or it doesn't.
It is never the best solution, but in either case one or both parties are either not consenting or capable of consenting, putting the blood on the hands of those who took advantage.
feannigvogten is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 02:50 AM   #32
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
It is never the best solution, but in either case one or both parties are either not consenting or capable of consenting, putting the blood on the hands of those who took advantage.
Translation: PRO-CHOICE
eskimosik is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 03:02 AM   #33
feannigvogten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Translation: PRO-CHOICE
Pro-consequences is more accurate.
feannigvogten is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 03:07 AM   #34
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Pro-consequences is more accurate.
No, it's not.

It's "pro-choice".

Suck it up and accept it...
eskimosik is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 04:10 AM   #35
new-nickname-zanovo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
They make an exemption because the women never agreed to it so she shouldn't have to give birth and raise the child.
Whether or not the woman agreed to it has nothing to do with whether the fetus has a right to life. If killing a fetus is murder, then killing a fetus is murder regardless of the circumstances under which it was created.
new-nickname-zanovo is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 04:14 AM   #36
new-nickname-zanovo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
It is never the best solution, but in either case one or both parties are either not consenting or capable of consenting, putting the blood on the hands of those who took advantage.
Again, this makes no logical sense. The "right to life" crowd believe that abortion is murder because the fetus is a person with a right to live. Rape and incest cannot possibly justify murder, can it?

(Just to be clear, I do not believe that abortion is murder. I am simply pointing out that those who believe abortion is murder must believe, if they are being logically consistent, that abortion is murder regardless of the circumstances under which the fetus was conceived. Anything else is a moral cop-out.)
new-nickname-zanovo is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 04:26 AM   #37
himecthekWiff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
So, include an exemption for documented rape and incest.
Why? Does that make the killing of the fetus that much more justified?
himecthekWiff is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 04:28 AM   #38
himecthekWiff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
They make an exemption because the women never agreed to it so she shouldn't have to give birth and raise the child.
Why not? Since when does incest always equal lack of consent?
himecthekWiff is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 05:01 AM   #39
yK2VgoEI

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
Why not? Since when does incest always equal lack of consent?
Some things never change.
yK2VgoEI is offline


Old 12-07-2011, 07:17 AM   #40
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
If you want to save a child from abortion then go to one of the many agencies that arrange for the adoption of children from mothers planning abortions, otherwise, shut up, as it's not your body and you truly have no right to have an opinion, one way or the other.
It not being my body may mean that I have no right to dictate what happens. To say that it means I have no right to an opinion shows just how irrational people are when discussing this topic.
Licacivelip is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity