Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I caught an article about that a few days ago.
The writer was saying that RUSSIA failed.......not communism. And if the role was reversed (IE: Communism here in the US, and Capitalism in the USSR), the results would have been the same, the soviets would have failed. I'll look for that link. It was the same claim though......."OMG, communism HAS to work, it can't FAIL.......ignore where it has failed, because they didn't do it right! They lacked the american spirit to succeed!!" |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
http://progressingamerica.blogspot.c...asnt-been.html
Here's one. Basically if I'm grasping them correctly........ They're saying that 1) Marx wanted communism to be adopted by an INDUSTRIALIZED society, with democratic institutions......and said that's the ONLY way it can be done. 2) all the countries that have 'tried' communism have lacked one or both of those primary requirements.......thus it's not a valid test 3) Eliminating the government is also required.....and other nations didn't do that. Thus.... communism hasn't been 'tried' the way it was meant to be.......... I mean it WOULD work....if only it was done correctly. Or some such shit. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
http://progressingamerica.blogspot.c...asnt-been.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
http://libcom.org/thought/anarchist-...n-introduction
I'll butt out of your thread now.....^^^anarcho-communism |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
http://libcom.org/thought/anarchist-...n-introduction ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
PURE communism keeps everyone on the same "level,"
where no one holds power over anyone else, and everyone is a VITAL part of the whole. EVERYONE works, to the best of his/her ability, to supply the best products for the needs of ALL, not because of laws and rules and regulations, but because it's in the best interest of the entire society. Because there is only so much a person can truly NEED ~ air to breathe, water to drink, food to eat, shelter/housing, clothing, etc. ~ those Basic Needs are the top priority, with the "luxury" needs readily available, as it becomes practical to offer them. As an example: clothing. You need basic COVERING, but we all want comfort, style and some beauty about them. Anyway, I think I've heard it compared to an ant colony or a bee hive ... |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests) | |
|