"REAL Communism has never been tried!"
 

I hear liberals say this a lot.

Please explain why it has never been tried.. What it would take to implement this "real" Communism and how it would differ enough from past examples of Communism to remain viable..

?

I caught an article about that a few days ago.

The writer was saying that RUSSIA failed.......not communism. And if the role was reversed (IE: Communism here in the US, and Capitalism in the USSR), the results would have been the same, the soviets would have failed.

I'll look for that link.

It was the same claim though......."OMG, communism HAS to work, it can't FAIL.......ignore where it has failed, because they didn't do it right! They lacked the american spirit to succeed!!"

They are pissed because there freak hippie culture never took off.

LOL

"Real" communism, as described by the Jew Marx, is being tried every time an established societal norm is attacked.

Basic human nature is an obstacle to successful communism in any form, imo.

Yeah, I can see the Marxist theory at work.. But we're failing as a result, and this "Real" communism hasn't yet come about.

Can one of you uber-enlightened libs explain this to me?

I'm afraid I don't understand.. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/confused.jpg

The reasone the freaks gave up and started pushing other BS.

Not true. It's still the same BS, and they've been highly successful at it.

Your right maybe they did not give it up.

http://progressingamerica.blogspot.c...asnt-been.html

Here's one.

Basically if I'm grasping them correctly........

They're saying that
1) Marx wanted communism to be adopted by an INDUSTRIALIZED society, with democratic institutions......and said that's the ONLY way it can be done.
2) all the countries that have 'tried' communism have lacked one or both of those primary requirements.......thus it's not a valid test
3) Eliminating the government is also required.....and other nations didn't do that.

Thus.... communism hasn't been 'tried' the way it was meant to be..........

I mean it WOULD work....if only it was done correctly.

Or some such shit.

Before you point at N. Korea........they covered that. They didn't 'eliminate' the government.....they formed it into authority dominated. It's somehow a difference.

its been tried. as much as it can be until the seems burst on the dam thats called society.

Just as I said in another thread...they're pushing communism so they come up with this bullshit.

I believe what they're talking about is anarcho-communism.

you oughtta smear some ointment on your two skeeter bites there girly.

http://libcom.org/thought/anarchist-...n-introduction

I'll butt out of your thread now.....^^^anarcho-communism

It's an open thread. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.jpg