DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/)
-   World Issues and Current Events (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/world-issues-current-events/)
-   -   Brief commentary on Karl Marx. Did you know this? (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/world-issues-current-events/90343-brief-commentary-karl-marx-did-you-know.html)

unlomarma 08-16-2012 02:50 AM

Brief commentary on Karl Marx. Did you know this?
 
Karl Marx hated the middle class for aspiring to upper-class riches, lawmakers in every level of government view employers and business owners as the state’s personal checking account. And because most small and medium sized businesses are owned by middle-class people, they are the target.

Marx saw himself and other Communist Party leaders as rulers of the lower class. The Ruling Class would own all property and keep all wealth in a society, and the large lower class was ruled by those better suited for leadership.

But this didn’t happen immediately – the transition period to Communism was “Socialism,” where the lower class didn’t have to immediately forgo property ownership. Instead, property was slowly and painfully yielded through taxing, and schemes for other transfers of wealth. Because the ruling class was the government, and government made the laws, government control was inevitable.

http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/05/1...-middle-class/

dodsCooggipsehome 08-16-2012 02:52 AM

Translation: Marxists oppose economic growth..

They're steady staters..

Practitioners of steady state economics.

yasmin 08-16-2012 02:53 AM

Once you understand that, their economic policies make perfect sense..

They don't WANT you to do better and move up the ladder.

They want the ladder pulled down..

Unonounaple 08-16-2012 02:54 AM

Bullseye.

lymnCymment 08-16-2012 02:55 AM

now study Kampuchea. you had a collective of 25 members. with-in three years, 21 were killed by the last four.

IteseFrusty 08-16-2012 02:56 AM

Quote:

Bullseye.
Yeah.. And if you think about it that way, their zero growth policies aren't merely the product of economic incompetence.

They make perfect sense..

These people aren't stupid.

They're evil.

Navzrrqt 08-16-2012 02:58 AM

Quote:

Yeah.. And if you think about it that way, their zero growth policies aren't merely the product of economic incompetence.

They make perfect sense..

These people aren't stupid.

They're evil.
problem was, theyd hire the handicapped. that way, they could tell their underling what to do after he fucked up royaly.

whatisthebluepill 08-16-2012 02:59 AM

If people were just aware of this and understood it.. No tricks required.. Just understood the philosophy, from Marx himself..

It would alter the political landscape in this country overnight.

HoqCBYMl 08-16-2012 02:59 AM

Quote:

They're evil.
Bullseye.

UvjqTVVC 08-16-2012 03:01 AM

They would KNOW that these people don't want them to succeed..

Why?

Because then they become the "Petty bourgeois" and therefore become part of the problem.

Only the lowest classes are the heroes in Marx's telling. The Middle Class is nothing but an impediment.

triarmarm 08-16-2012 03:07 AM

They would also realize immediately that our system is not designed to accommodate Marx and his theories..

And that everything we have must fail before they can be incorporated..

tearidrusydet 08-16-2012 03:08 AM

And you can't put these people in charge.. Because of that.

OEMCHEAPSOFTDOWNLOAD 08-16-2012 03:14 AM

Quote:

They would also realize immediately that our system is not designed to accommodate Marx and his theories..
It is, actually.

Any group of people is allowed to incorporate, and live by their leanings, within the broader society.

But they rarely do. Because that isn't the goal.

RooxiaNof 08-16-2012 03:15 AM

Quote:

It is, actually.

Any group of people is allowed to incorporate, and live by their leanings, within the broader society.

But they rarely do. Because that isn't the goal.

Well, we're not talking about a simple commune.

Marx saw a global movement..

mynaflzak 08-16-2012 03:18 AM

INCOME TAX.



SOCIAL SECURITY.....

ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME TAX.


NATIONAL HEALTHCARE... ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME

TAX.

PilotJargon 08-16-2012 03:19 AM

But they rarely do.




..AND IT USUALLY COLLAPSES QUICKLY.

Diortarkivoff 08-16-2012 03:20 AM

Quote:

Well, we're not talking about a simple commune.

Marx saw a global movement..

Of course.

Communism is attainable, on the small scale. Hell, Indian tribes did it for 10,000 years!

But, that's not really Marxism. Marxism is a life-defeating philosophy of taking and taking until there's nothing left to take. There is no giving, in that religion.

It's a death cult. Nothing more, nothing less...

bQXHsKzS 08-16-2012 03:20 AM

EPA, ET AL


SPECIAL PRIVILEGES FOR UNIONS...




THESE SERVE TO EXHAUST PRIVATE INCOME

AND DIMINISH OPPORTUNITY.

Jourgenz 08-16-2012 03:20 AM

Quote:

INCOME TAX.



SOCIAL SECURITY.....

ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME TAX.


NATIONAL HEALTHCARE... ANOTHER NAME FOR INCOME

TAX.

It's about way more than that.. The implications of this are huge.

It explains everything.

For anyone who has ever looked at a liberal and just scratched their head in amazement, this explains it perfectly.

They're acting rationally.. Their agenda makes perfect sense.. And so do their policies.

TO A MARXIST.

thehhhyips 08-16-2012 03:21 AM

Their economics.. Their attacks on everything from the automobile to McDonald's.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2