LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-22-2012, 01:33 AM   #1
Drysnyaty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
569
Senior Member
Default New La. law: Sex offenders must list status on social websites..
A new Louisiana law requires sex offenders and child predators to state their criminal status on their Facebook or other social networking page, with the law's author saying the bill is the first of its kind in the nation.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/20/tech/l...dia/index.html

What do we think of this?
Drysnyaty is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 01:34 AM   #2
Effofqueeno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
about fucking time. you might be loosing three or four posters though.
Effofqueeno is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 01:38 AM   #3
Affolfembonge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
about fucking time. you might be loosing three or four posters though.
lol..................
Affolfembonge is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 01:43 AM   #4
violalmina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
..... yeah ..... what jebe said .....
violalmina is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 01:46 AM   #5
Finanziamento

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
It's bullshit, they should already be in a landfill.
Finanziamento is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:06 AM   #6
HagsPusia

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



HOW WILL THEY ENFORCE THIS?
HagsPusia is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:07 AM   #7
TubOppomo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
This is simply another worthless, bullshit law.........

Because:

1) Sex offenders should already be dead, and dead people have no need of the interwebz, or social networking.
2) Sex offenders NOT dead, should be locked up in prison, and prisoners have no need of the interwebz or social networking.
3) Sex offenders NOT already caught, aren't going to list their status as 'sex offender'.

Can we please get back to some degree of common sense here?

This is simple stuff really.......If you fuck a little kid, you should die. End of story.
TubOppomo is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:07 AM   #8
ValintinoV

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
335
Senior Member
Default
I think it's bullshit, but before you guys flame me for saying that, let me explain why. I think the same thing about convicted felons not being allowed to own firearms.

When a criminal gets out of prison he's supposed to have paid his debt to society in full. If lawmakers don't think these people can be trusted to behave, then they need to come up with stiffer penalties for them. If the debt they paid wasn't enough, then the law needs to be changed to something more effective. The notion that sexual predators can somehow be rehabilitated is fantasy land, liberal bullshit, and in my view they should be executed. These pissant half measures are pointless and they don't even address, much less solve, the fucking problem.
These people are either menaces to society and don't belong at all or they're full, respectable citizens. There is no in between. The law needs to be adjusted to accommodate this reality.
ValintinoV is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:08 AM   #9
whatisthebluepill

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
Great it will keep the honest offenders honest. All the rest will use fake names.
whatisthebluepill is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:10 AM   #10
Amirmsheesk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
I think it's bullshit, but before you guys flame me for saying that, let me explain why. I think the same thing about convicted felons not being allowed to own firearms.

When a criminal gets out of prison he's supposed to have paid his debt to society in full. If lawmakers don't think these people can be trusted to behave, then they need to come up with stiffer penalties for them. If the debt they paid wasn't enough, then the law needs to be changed to something more effective. The notion that sexual predators can somehow be rehabilitated is fantasy land, liberal bullshit, and in my view they should be executed. These pissant half measures are pointless and they don't even address, much less solve, the fucking problem.
These people are either menaces to society and don't belong at all or they're full, respectable citizens. There is no in between. The law needs to be adjusted to accommodate this reality.
I agree on the firearms issue scorp. 100%.

The constitution makes NO allowance for exclusion of felons. And stiffer penalties are clearly needed as well.

This is a bullshit law.....and will help NOTHING. It will save zero kids from being molested. It will prevent zero rapes.

It will simply create more paperwork and departments to soak up tax dollars.

It's a waste.
Amirmsheesk is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:12 AM   #11
km2000

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
no. not realy. its a step in the right direction about getting the pedos out of the communities and under the ground sooner.
km2000 is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:12 AM   #12
lkastonidwedsrer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
317
Senior Member
Default
I think it's bullshit, but before you guys flame me for saying that, let me explain why. I think the same thing about convicted felons not being allowed to own firearms.

When a criminal gets out of prison he's supposed to have paid his debt to society in full. If lawmakers don't think these people can be trusted to behave, then they need to come up with stiffer penalties for them. If the debt they paid wasn't enough, then the law needs to be changed to something more effective. The notion that sexual predators can somehow be rehabilitated is fantasy land, liberal bullshit, and in my view they should be executed. These pissant half measures are pointless and they don't even address, much less solve, the fucking problem.
These people are either menaces to society and don't belong at all or they're full, respectable citizens. There is no in between. The law needs to be adjusted to accommodate this reality.
That's what I was thinking..

If we can't trust these guys running loose? Why are they loose?

If we can never trust them? Then we should just kill them.
lkastonidwedsrer is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:28 AM   #13
bestworkother

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RECIDIVISM RATES?
bestworkother is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:39 AM   #14
rxnixoncom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
521
Senior Member
Default
There are states (unless it has been ruled unconstitutional) that judge sex offenders as mentally ill and lock them in the state laughing academy until they are no longer a danger to themselves or others.
rxnixoncom is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:44 AM   #15
Saad Khan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
..... I agree with punching the ticket of sex criminals .....

..... their ride on the planet should be over .....

..... but ..... until we start doing that .....

..... forcing them to announce themselves .....

..... is better than letting them "blend in" .....
Saad Khan is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 02:54 AM   #16
RemiVedia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
Speaking of sex offenders........why isn't common sense here screaming about this?
RemiVedia is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 03:01 AM   #17
Itrtuawh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Speaking of sex offenders........why isn't common sense here screaming about this?
Apparently he's fled Canada for Pakistan.

http://downloadpolitics.com/showthre...l=1#post651470
Itrtuawh is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 03:06 AM   #18
ffdfriendforurr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



HOW WILL THEY ENFORCE THIS?
That's what I thought.

These networks are international. Supposing some paedo from another country chooses not to comply.

Nothing can be done.
ffdfriendforurr is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 03:18 AM   #19
Njxatsbf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RECIDIVISM RATES?

I've seen them calculated at extremely low, and extremely high levels, depending on the study.

Far as I'm concerned, it's all academic, at least as far as crimes against children go. Death penalty. Period.

Caveat: We shouldn't be labeling some "sex offenders" as sex offenders. Some guy on a jobsite taking a piss beside his truck is not trying to show his weenie to the chillun, but they can be prosecuted under the same laws.
Njxatsbf is offline


Old 06-22-2012, 04:43 AM   #20
hujdrftgkas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WHY NOT SEX OFFENDER ASYLUMS?

PUT THEM ON SMALL RESERVATIONS... KEEP THEM THERE.


LET 'EM LOOK AT TIGER BEAT..... TELETUBBIES...


...WHATEVER.



BUT KEEP THEM THERE.



hujdrftgkas is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity