Reply to Thread New Thread |
06-01-2012, 09:46 PM | #1 |
|
Ron Paul Joins Democrats in Defeating Sex Selection Abortion Ban, Allowing Genocide to Continue
It seems there really is a war on women being waged by the democrat party. A vile, wicked war of death. Ron Paul and six other Republican have joined democrats in supporting this mass murder. Republicans who don’t care about the slaughter of little girls, joining Ron Paul, are Justin Amash (Mich.), Charlie Bass (N.H.), Mary Bono Mack (Calif.), Robert Dold (Ill.), Richard Hanna (N.Y.), and Nan Hayworth (N.Y.). HR 3541 Prenatal Non-discrimination Act roll call: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll299.xml This legislation also included a ban on race-based selection as well as the sex-based selection ban on abortions. This is something democrats would rather you not know. Source: A Time For Choosing Someone's got some 'splain'n to do. |
|
06-01-2012, 11:02 PM | #3 |
|
Paul's vote was consistent with his philosophy. This bill would have added another cumbersome, invasive, and expensive intrusion of the Federal Government into the private affairs of the citizenry. |
|
06-01-2012, 11:16 PM | #4 |
|
Page 18 has a section that could violate confidential doctor/patient privilege.
3 ‘‘(d) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—A physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, counselor, or other medical or mental health professional shall report known or suspected violations of any of this section to appropriate law enforcement authorities. Whoever violates this requirement shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. If they're so worried about girls and niggers being aborted then overturn Roe v Wade and let the states decide. |
|
06-01-2012, 11:22 PM | #5 |
|
Outside of that reporting requirement and the "powers vested by the Commerce clause" bullshit, I fail to see why anyone would be block a bill that would stop gender and race determined abortion.
Page 14-15: (b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.—In accordance with the above findings, Congress enacts the following pursuant to Congress’ power under— (1) the Commerce Clause; (2) section 2 of the 13th amendment; (3) section 5 of the 14th amendment, including the power to enforce the prohibition on government action denying equal protection of the laws; and (4) section 8 of article I to make all laws necessary and proper for the carrying into execution of powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States. I always wince when they bring up the Commerce clause and article 1 sec 8. That often means the authority for the act is questionable. |
|
06-01-2012, 11:33 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 01:30 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 01:50 AM | #10 |
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 02:01 AM | #11 |
|
I personally don't agree with abortion, and I do agree that it should be a decision for the states. But this bill is typical of Big Government/Big Brother bullshit. Medicos are now supposed to report possible cases of discriminatory selection? That's patently ridiculous. Any woman could get an ultrasound, find out the sex of their baby, then go to an abortion clinic and LIE, duh.
What's the Fed going to do? Require lie detector tests in every clinic? I wouldn't put it past them, of course. There's a few gazillion right there. Or set up a nation-wide education program for clinic counselors? Teach them how to ferret out suspected selectors? There goes a few more gazillion. What if a woman gets falsely accused and has to go through our interminable and costly "justice" system to clear herself? Well that would generate a few gazillions for the lawyers and courts. If you can't see this bill as another wasteful and ridiculous intrusion by the government, I just really don't know what to say. |
|
06-02-2012, 02:38 AM | #12 |
|
Page 18 has a section that could violate confidential doctor/patient privilege. |
|
06-02-2012, 05:27 AM | #14 |
|
BTW, for you pro-lifers, how is sex-selection any WORSE a reason for abortion than any other reason???? I'd like to see his reasoning on this. I know the guy doesn't support abortion. Something must have really stuck in his craw for him to pass up a chance to stop at least one reason for killing the supremely innocent. |
|
06-02-2012, 05:30 AM | #15 |
|
I personally don't agree with abortion, and I do agree that it should be a decision for the states. But this bill is typical of Big Government/Big Brother bullshit. Medicos are now supposed to report possible cases of discriminatory selection? That's patently ridiculous. Any woman could get an ultrasound, find out the sex of their baby, then go to an abortion clinic and LIE, duh. This fucking world is spinning out of control. |
|
06-02-2012, 05:31 AM | #16 |
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 05:35 AM | #18 |
|
|
|
06-02-2012, 05:36 AM | #20 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|