LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-01-2012, 09:46 PM   #1
BorBitExatini

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default Ron Paul Voted With Dems on HR 3541
Ron Paul Joins Democrats in Defeating Sex Selection Abortion Ban, Allowing Genocide to Continue

It seems there really is a war on women being waged by the democrat party. A vile, wicked war of death. Ron Paul and six other Republican have joined democrats in supporting this mass murder.

Republicans who don’t care about the slaughter of little girls, joining Ron Paul, are Justin Amash (Mich.), Charlie Bass (N.H.), Mary Bono Mack (Calif.), Robert Dold (Ill.), Richard Hanna (N.Y.), and Nan Hayworth (N.Y.).


HR 3541 Prenatal Non-discrimination Act roll call:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll299.xml

This legislation also included a ban on race-based selection as well as the sex-based selection ban on abortions. This is something democrats would rather you not know.

Source: A Time For Choosing

Someone's got some 'splain'n to do.
BorBitExatini is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 10:48 PM   #2
Spongebob

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
Paul's vote was consistent with his philosophy. This bill would have added another cumbersome, invasive, and expensive intrusion of the Federal Government into the private affairs of the citizenry.
Spongebob is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 11:02 PM   #3
Z3s9vQZj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Paul's vote was consistent with his philosophy. This bill would have added another cumbersome, invasive, and expensive intrusion of the Federal Government into the private affairs of the citizenry.
so sex selection by abortion is OK with you and RP? you are consistent with the Chinese, congratulations.
Z3s9vQZj is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 11:16 PM   #4
w4WBthjv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
Page 18 has a section that could violate confidential doctor/patient privilege.

3 ‘‘(d) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—A physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, counselor, or other medical or mental health professional shall report known or suspected violations of any of this section to appropriate law enforcement authorities. Whoever violates this requirement shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year,
or both.


If they're so worried about girls and niggers being aborted then overturn Roe v Wade and let the states decide.
w4WBthjv is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 11:22 PM   #5
ebBPxIai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Outside of that reporting requirement and the "powers vested by the Commerce clause" bullshit, I fail to see why anyone would be block a bill that would stop gender and race determined abortion.

Page 14-15:

(b) CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.—In accordance
with the above findings, Congress enacts the following pursuant to Congress’ power under—
(1) the Commerce Clause;
(2) section 2 of the 13th amendment;

(3) section 5 of the 14th amendment, including
the power to enforce the prohibition on government
action denying equal protection of the laws; and
(4) section 8 of article I to make all laws necessary and proper for the carrying into execution of
powers vested by the Constitution in the Government
of the United States.

I always wince when they bring up the Commerce clause and article 1 sec 8.
That often means the authority for the act is questionable.
ebBPxIai is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 11:33 PM   #6
investmentonlinev2006x

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
675
Senior Member
Default
Paul's vote was consistent with his philosophy. This bill would have added another cumbersome, invasive, and expensive intrusion of the Federal Government into the private affairs of the citizenry.
Ron Paul supports abortion?
investmentonlinev2006x is offline


Old 06-01-2012, 11:37 PM   #7
robstamps

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
It's a strange vote on his part.
I'm curious what Ron Paul's reason is.
robstamps is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 01:30 AM   #8
ThomasMannfanny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
No, I'm not ok with sex selection in abortion. But the bill can't be enforced, which doesn't mean the Fed wouldn't spend a gazillion dollars trying to enforce it. It's more bullshit bureaucracy at its worst.
ThomasMannfanny is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 01:32 AM   #9
Wsjltrhe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
BTW, for you pro-lifers, how is sex-selection any WORSE a reason for abortion than any other reason????
Wsjltrhe is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 01:50 AM   #10
Maphpseurse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
BTW, for you pro-lifers, how is sex-selection any WORSE a reason for abortion than any other reason????
how about race selection. abortion is murder (IMO) but opinions are like assholes-----------I say let each state vote on it.

I do not understand why abortion is such a major political football.
Maphpseurse is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 02:01 AM   #11
BeaseHoca

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
Default
I personally don't agree with abortion, and I do agree that it should be a decision for the states. But this bill is typical of Big Government/Big Brother bullshit. Medicos are now supposed to report possible cases of discriminatory selection? That's patently ridiculous. Any woman could get an ultrasound, find out the sex of their baby, then go to an abortion clinic and LIE, duh.

What's the Fed going to do? Require lie detector tests in every clinic? I wouldn't put it past them, of course. There's a few gazillion right there. Or set up a nation-wide education program for clinic counselors? Teach them how to ferret out suspected selectors? There goes a few more gazillion. What if a woman gets falsely accused and has to go through our interminable and costly "justice" system to clear herself? Well that would generate a few gazillions for the lawyers and courts.

If you can't see this bill as another wasteful and ridiculous intrusion by the government, I just really don't know what to say.
BeaseHoca is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 02:38 AM   #12
MarythePuppy6

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
Page 18 has a section that could violate confidential doctor/patient privilege.

3 ‘‘(d) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—A physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, counselor, or other medical or mental health professional shall report known or suspected violations of any of this section to appropriate law enforcement authorities. Whoever violates this requirement shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year,
or both.


If they're so worried about girls and niggers being aborted then overturn Roe v Wade and let the states decide.
Now we're gonna turn doctors into cops?
MarythePuppy6 is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 02:40 AM   #13
Zjohkrbi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
BTW, for you pro-lifers, how is sex-selection any WORSE a reason for abortion than any other reason????
Exactly. It's either legal or not legal. "Why" doesn't matter.

Fuck the brain police.
Zjohkrbi is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:27 AM   #14
fluoxet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
BTW, for you pro-lifers, how is sex-selection any WORSE a reason for abortion than any other reason????
They weren't voting on any other reasons, Kool Aid drinker. They were voting on sex selection. The good doctor, who delivers babies, should be against such a thing. You know, seeing as without life, everything else is meaningless.

I'd like to see his reasoning on this. I know the guy doesn't support abortion. Something must have really stuck in his craw for him to pass up a chance to stop at least one reason for killing the supremely innocent.
fluoxet is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:30 AM   #15
Edisesyethisp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default
I personally don't agree with abortion, and I do agree that it should be a decision for the states. But this bill is typical of Big Government/Big Brother bullshit. Medicos are now supposed to report possible cases of discriminatory selection? That's patently ridiculous. Any woman could get an ultrasound, find out the sex of their baby, then go to an abortion clinic and LIE, duh.

What's the Fed going to do? Require lie detector tests in every clinic? I wouldn't put it past them, of course. There's a few gazillion right there. Or set up a nation-wide education program for clinic counselors? Teach them how to ferret out suspected selectors? There goes a few more gazillion. What if a woman gets falsely accused and has to go through our interminable and costly "justice" system to clear herself? Well that would generate a few gazillions for the lawyers and courts.

If you can't see this bill as another wasteful and ridiculous intrusion by the government, I just really don't know what to say.
It's a nice way to curtail abortion for birth-control purposes. Seeing as it's murder, we should be all for that. Fuck a doctor having to do a little extra work. Fuck him right in his ear. We should be making abortion exponentially harder to get, not worrying about the fucking doctor. A baby has to lose his/her life so a doctor won't be inconvenienced?

This fucking world is spinning out of control.
Edisesyethisp is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:31 AM   #16
Twendypreency

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Now we're gonna turn doctors into cops?
Are you a "cop" if you report somebody breaking into your neighbor's house? If it makes abortion harder to come by, it's a good thing.
Twendypreency is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:31 AM   #17
Drugsonl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
531
Senior Member
Default
Exactly. It's either legal or not legal. "Why" doesn't matter.

Fuck the brain police.
That's a neat argument for an ideal, laboratory-clean world. We don't live in such a world.
Drugsonl is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:35 AM   #18
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
You can't reason with neocon liberals.
Kamendoriks is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:36 AM   #19
wizardasa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
It was a stunt..

I would have voted in favor of banning it as a foot in the door... As this shouldn't be a federal issue anyway..

But it was a cheap, election year stunt.
wizardasa is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 05:36 AM   #20
rozalinasi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
You clowns don't want less government, you want as much as the Democrats, only you want to impose your controls. Fuck that shit. Fuck all liberals.
rozalinasi is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity