[domeffire]

"To a remarkable degree, the challenges to the Affordable Care Act reflect an effort to codify legal nostalgia as legal doctrine. The opinions of some lower courts striking down the individual mandate, as well as the arguments of the States and private plaintiffs in the Supreme Court urging that result, repeatedly hark back to bygone eras of American jurisprudence. This legal facsimile of reincarnation seeks to revive not just the long discredited doctrines invoked by an ossified Judiciary to thwart the New Deal. It goes back further still, to the dogma of an earlier time when the Judiciary regarded its principal function as the protection of private property, even at the expense of social justice, democratic values, and other individual rights."



http://balkin.blogspot.com/2012/05/l...ivism-and.html

[Mimsykzr]

If we don't protect property, the idea of "social justice" is meaningless.

Of course, my ideas of social justice and his are surely quite different.

I think justice is when a man owns what he has earned, whereas the liberals believe justice is when everybody shares what a few have earned.

I can't begin to describe how much I hate these people...

[fuslssdfaa]

If we don't protect property, the idea of "social justice" is meaningless.

Of course, my ideas of social justice and his are surely quite different.

I think justice is when a man owns what he has earned, whereas the liberals believe justice is when everybody shares what a few have earned.

I can't begin to describe how much I hate these people...

They begin by viewing the Earth as "belonging" to all its inhabitants. From there, it's pretty easy for them to start feeling infringed upon when some guy next door owns more of it than they do....especially when he wants to "do" something with it....

[anenselog]

This arrogant fuck acts like this has all been decided decades ago, and that's that. Fuck him in the neck!

[Thifiadardivy]

And when the country plummeted into the Great Depression, the federal government had no regulatory brakes to slow the fall nor a social safety net to cushion the impact.


Just like Obama et. al have cushioned this latest blow?

Delusional.

[Fededorbprago]

And when the country plummeted into the Great Depression, the federal government had no regulatory brakes to slow the fall nor a social safety net to cushion the impact.


Just like Obama et. al have cushioned this latest blow?

Delusional.

He obviously likes a lot of cushion....a LOT of cushion....

[JulieSmithXIV]

And when the country plummeted into the Great Depression, the federal government had no regulatory brakes to slow the fall nor a social safety net to cushion the impact.


Just like Obama et. al have cushioned this latest blow?

Delusional.

i beg to differ. realize they had all the power to increase tarrifs and regulate utilities, railroads, and ships. im sure their buddies on the federal reserve board were sympathetic to the economies plight.

[OlegSan]

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISEASE, THEY PROVE IT EVERY DAY. THE DEFECTIVE DRD4 GENE EXISTS IN ALL LIBERALS. SOMEONE NEEDS TO FIND A CURE, OR THEY SHOULD ALL BE LOCKED UP IN THE INTERESTS OF THE SANE WORLD.

[EbrsaRynleot]

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISEASE, THEY PROVE IT EVERY DAY. THE DEFECTIVE DRD4 GENE EXISTS IN ALL LIBERALS. SOMEONE NEEDS TO FIND A CURE, OR THEY SHOULD ALL BE LOCKED UP IN THE INTERESTS OF THE SANE WORLD.

Forget that trash.

If that's true, we're fucked six ways to Sunday.

It's a battle of ideas, not genetics.

[Repwailia]

They seek justice in "outcomes" and intentions.

When that's your lens, you sacrifice liberties.. Property among them.

[DiatryDal]

It's a battle of ideas, not genetics.

I don't know about that... Liberals aren't interested in ideas.

They don't want to hear them. Debate them.. Nothing.

They just want what they want, and they want it right now..

[mnhloot]

They seek justice in "outcomes" and intentions.

When that's your lens, you sacrifice liberties.. Property among them.

What makes them that way?

[Glamyclitlemi]

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISEASE, THEY PROVE IT EVERY DAY. THE DEFECTIVE DRD4 GENE EXISTS IN ALL LIBERALS. SOMEONE NEEDS TO FIND A CURE, OR THEY SHOULD ALL BE LOCKED UP IN THE INTERESTS OF THE SANE WORLD.

Lead is an effective and inexpensive cure for liberals.

[pkopwqzsdcvbn]

Forget that trash.

If that's true, we're fucked six ways to Sunday.

It's a battle of ideas, not genetics.

it has been scientifically established that liberals all have a defective DRD4 gene. look it up, it is genetic.

[Katoabralia]

Lead is an effective and inexpensive cure for liberals.

They aren't worth doing prison time.

[Cyncceply]

it has been scientifically established that liberals all have a defective DRD4 gene. look it up, it is genetic.

Thanks, I learned something new today.

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/weir...105917218.html

[SeLvesTr]

I don't know about that... Liberals aren't interested in ideas.

They don't want to hear them. Debate them.. Nothing.

They just want what they want, and they want it right now..

Yes, liberals like the author of that article are probably unreachable. We don't try to change him. We have to get to the independents, and the youth, and those who have never paid attention.

It can't be genetic. If it's genetic, I don't know what to do...

[monologue]

What makes them that way?

They're fundamentally unhappy with America and how it is structured.

A bunch of corporate entities support this also.. Strict Constitutional Conservatism isn't profitable.

If the Federal Government were restrained in its scope and power by the Constitution, all sorts of profitable things would become impossible.

Farm subsidies, for one example...

[iDzcs7TU]

They aren't worth doing prison time.

Disposing of liberals should not only be legal, it should be mandatory. Liberals are like pedophiles, rapists and serial killers. No amount of therapy, incarceration or reeducation will ever cure them. As long as they live they'll be menaces to civil society.

[Adimos]

They're fundamentally unhappy with America and how it is structured.

A bunch of corporate entities support this also.. Strict Constitutional Conservatism isn't profitable.

If the Federal Government were restrained in its scope and power by the Constitution, all sorts of profitable things would become impossible.

Farm subsidies, for one example...

I googled Rocat defective gene theory, it proves to be correct.