Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-28-2012, 10:01 AM | #1 |
|
Giving them the benefit of the doubt, I always just assumed that liberals were stupid... By extension, this means the President is stupid.. And because he, and they, are so stupid, they pass stupid policies into law.. then wonder why they don't work? Wondering why their "green" energy plans don't create jobs? Wondering why high taxes don't stimulate economic growth? Wondering why their idiotic plans lead to less of everything? Yet they promote them over and over again.. With the same result: FAILURE.
But that's not entirely true.. As it turns out, I was giving them far too much credit... Because the truth is, they are both evil and stupid. There's a completely overlooked article in the rabidly left wing "Mother Jones" from 2010 that explains their evil, stupid thinking perfectly. I've seen people wrack their brains trying to explain the liberal's bizarre behavior and the closest they ever get is something along the lines of "Socialism!" Or "They just want to grow government!" "Attacks on the Rich = Envy!" and so on.. There may be bits of truth in those accusations, but it's not nearly that simple.. Their desire is to achieve a static economy. Literally one with zero growth. So, it's not that they believe their silly plans will take root and create wealth and prosperity.. They WANT them to work, but to them a plan that "works" arrests economic growth entirely.. So, why? That's a good question, right? It centers around resource depletion, but it really goes much farther than that... It encompasses everything liberalism preaches. Social Justice.. As many government employees as possible.. Income re-distribution (Because this is NECESSARY in a static economy) Punishing conventional energy.. Further, they see this as a world wide problem.. So, then such things as international carbon tax schemes and GLOBAL re-distribution become necessary.. Because everything is static, everywhere.. And if a few guys end up with all the money, and there's no growth, because they won't permit it.. Then you have poverty, falling living standards and eventually, upheaval. So, while we assume they're looking at some wrong headed idea and are thinking it will bring prosperity.. They aren't! They're looking at arresting growth! Because an idea that "works" kills economic growth! They want to freeze everything, grab business capital, re-distribute assets and just pull the world economy to a full stop. Well, in first world nations anyway.. The less fortunate will be caught up and then they can STOP GROWING TOO! This article explains it ALL! Frankly, I'm amazed they published it.. Because in so doing, they've unmasked themselves and explained liberalism's strange proclivities better than any other thing I've read in my entire life. It's a must read, and viewed through this lens, EVERYTHING liberals do makes perfect sense. Nothing Grows Forever Why do we keep thinking the economy will? Unless, of course, there's a third way. Could we have a healthy economy that doesn't grow? Could we stave off ecological collapse by reining in the world economy? Could we do it without starving? http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...deficit-growth |
|
05-28-2012, 02:20 PM | #3 |
|
The Democratic party was hijacked by , eh, how else can I say it, communists, "Jews", "minorities", and subversives of every stripe.
The word "liberal" has also been corrupted from it's original meaning. As "gay" once meant happy, carefree or "queer" once meant strange, odd, "liberal" once meant generous or flexible. A person can't use either of these terms in their original meaning because the terms have been hijacked. A person can no longer speak of conservatives either without denoting the NEO-"conservatives" who also hijacked that party. If you look to see who the people were that took over the Democratic Party you will find that they belong to the same ethnic group that changed the Republicans to neo-conservatives. You can identify them by looking at campaign financing for the amounts of contributions coming from whom going to whom. The correlation between the contributions and the ethnic group providing the bulk of them is unmistakable. When it comes to the preserving the environment I believe that we should be conservative in the use of them, by which I mean that we should avoid polluting ourselves, destroying the natural environment, and consuming resources at a rate faster than they can be replaced. In other words try to aim for a state of "sustainable" growth, one which is not destined to result in overcrowding and all the terrible problems associated with it. Waste is not a conservative principle. But because of the madness of some people who have used frugality and needful concern as an excuse to attack industry I am unable to express my position without being unduly associated with them. My "liberality" is simple. The availability of certain goods are not much use if clean air and water are unavailable. A population of humans can not continue indefinitely unabated without eventually meeting natural limitations imposed by nature any more than bacteria in a Petri dish. This is common sense. Where I live farm land is being rapidly depleted by people fleeing the congestion of the north and all it's associated head aches. The supply of land in not unlimited. Who wants to live in a place like India or China? "silent reply" Neither do they or they wouldn't be competing with each other to leave the place and come to the US. You can take a bunch of rats or monkeys and force them to live in crowded conditions and the results are hellish. With humans it is no different. If people do not learn to contain their urges to procreate within a viable limit eventually these conditions will arise and someone or something will happen to reduce the population. If it is not a war or something some action taken by the rulers, as in China, then Mother Nature herself will address the problem by disease and starvation. The problem is that white people know this and are conscientious about producing offspring they cannot afford. This is much less true with blacks while Hispanics are making a deliberate effort to overwhelm the Gringo wherever they settle, while the Jews are encouraging the whole demographic shift so that no homogenous nation will exist, leaving them the only organized structure capable of acting in concert. So while I believe that there is an optimal point of equilibrium in which the rate of consumption of resources should not exceed sustainable growth, I also see a pressing need to address the demographic shift occurring in the US with as much concern as is being shown for that of Israel. |
|
05-28-2012, 03:50 PM | #4 |
|
I have puzzled over these people all of my life.. And wondered WHEN they would see that their policies have failed, accept that and discard them..
But everything they do makes perfect sense now. And they'll never quit. Steady State economics has evolved recently with things like carbon credits.. But it's an old idea. The article explains the origins and the logic.. Everything they do can be explained this way. It's perfectly logical. |
|
05-28-2012, 04:12 PM | #12 |
|
http://youtu.be/uhtabJn7ilg http://youtu.be/RdVMQbZwP-0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ THE JEWS TOOK AWAY ALL THE BRIT'S FIREARMS AND GAVE THEM TO THE NIGGERS IN DETROIT AND L.A.......... |
|
05-28-2012, 04:22 PM | #13 |
|
I have puzzled over these people all of my life.. And wondered WHEN they would see that their policies have failed, accept that and discard them.. They really believe windmills and solar panels can fuel our planet. They believe that property ownership and businesses are a result of evil or corrupt behavior. Also, the idiot liberals Occupying Wall Street don't want static economy. They want instantaneous wealth without working for it. Who put that idea in their heads?? |
|
05-28-2012, 04:25 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
05-28-2012, 04:27 PM | #15 |
|
I think they believe they're working towards an end that's less lavish than even the moderately successful would enjoy.. but absolutely guaranteed. |
|
05-28-2012, 04:30 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
05-28-2012, 04:35 PM | #17 |
|
A GOVERNMENT ELITE.... IN TOTAL CONTROL OF A VAST PROLETARIATE LIVING IN PUBLIC HOUSING WITH MINIMAL AMENTIES.... NO LIBERTY... NO PROPERTY... NO MONEY.... NO RESPONSIBILTY... EXCEPT AS ASSIGNED. NO DECISIONS TO MAKE. A PERPETUAL FIRST-GRADER. LINES AND SYMBOLS ON THE FLOORS TO DIRECT EVERY MOVEMENT. BELLS. CAFETERIAS WITH FIXED MENUS. SCHEDULED MEDICAL MAINTENENCE.... LIKE CATTLE. BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU'LL BE. |
|
05-28-2012, 04:40 PM | #19 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | |
|