LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-25-2012, 07:14 AM   #1
Lerpenoaneway

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default Deadbeat Dads
A friend of mine, who injured his left side, (hand, arm, leg, and 4 broken ribs), recently lost his job. He lost his job, because he was unable to go to work, after trying to unload something heavy off of a trailer, and got crushed pretty good.

Not an 'on the job' injury.....His job said 'fuck ya, can't help ya, cya'. End of story.

He will have almost a year to recover. He can't draw unemployment, because you must be ABLE to work.......he's not.

He's simply screwed. Here's where it gets WORSE. After 2 months in the hospital, with no money coming IN.......his child support got behind. 2 kids, a slut of an ex wife......They send him a letter.......then summon him to court.

The judge says basically "tough shit you deadbeat bastard, you pay up, or you go to jail.....I don't CARE if you can't afford it!!".

Pretty fucked up.......yes?

IMO, it is.

Meanwhile, 49.5% of Americans, pay NO taxes. And we dare not label them 'deadbeats'......they are the 'struggling'.

No one will cut my buddy any slack.....and no one will dare point a finger at the 'broke' people, who get MORE from the tax system, than they've ever paid in. Year after year.

I can hear it now; the argument against taxing those who pay nothing is that they can’t afford it. Has there been a single deadbeat dad in the history of deadbeatery who has not made that very same argument to the court when it was time to set his child support? And has a single one of them ever won it? Never. Everybody has to pay something.

But but but, the RICH benefit from roads and schools and police and stuff......they SHOULD have to pay. And the 'poor' benefit from those same roads schools and police.....but they should NOT have to pay?

I wonder why liberals aren't out defending dead beat dads?

To quote Tim Nerenz Fair is not when half of us pay a lot for what all of us benefit from; fair is when all of us pay a little so that a limited government can do the few things we cannot do for ourselves. .......
Lerpenoaneway is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:16 AM   #2
SHpuntik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
608
Senior Member
Default
Was he working under the table? Did he seek legal representation?
SHpuntik is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:18 AM   #3
avaiguite

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
BTW, a percentage is a percentage. It doesn't matter what the product is. It's a mathematical law.
avaiguite is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:19 AM   #4
herawaq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
Was he working under the table? Did he seek legal representation?
Nah.....he was unloading a car for a friend....it wasn't work related. It was his own trailer even.....there's no one to sue here.

It fucked his shit up...His mom called me, they didn't think he'd make it.
herawaq is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:19 AM   #5
HakTaisanip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
BTW, a percentage is a percentage. It doesn't matter what the product is. It's a mathematical law.
HakTaisanip is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:22 AM   #6
PrettyFifa12

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
I wonder why we scream so much about people not paying support to ex's.......yet give the majority of freeloaders in the US a free pass?

Is it because we as a society KNOW that women (who retain custody 90% of the time), can't survive without a man's money?

I mean what gives here?
PrettyFifa12 is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:35 AM   #7
lipitrRrxX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
482
Senior Member
Default
I wonder why we scream so much about people not paying support to ex's.......yet give the majority of freeloaders in the US a free pass?

Is it because we as a society KNOW that women (who retain custody 90% of the time), can't survive without a man's money?

I mean what gives here?
They can drag your kids wherever they want.

Even if it's been biologically proven that you're not the father, you still have to pay child support after 2 years in California. Why? Because women are whores and the children mustn't suffer for it. This is a bad thing. No, a good thing. No, a bad thing. No...
lipitrRrxX is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:37 AM   #8
tofRobbroolve

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
They can drag your kids wherever they want.

Even if it's been biologically proven that you're not the father, you still have to pay child support after 2 years in California. Why? Because women are whores and the children mustn't suffer for it. This is a bad thing. No, a good thing. No, a bad thing. No...
However...let some guy that just got crushed, miss a couple payments to the bitch....and the state goes after him hard.

It's a wonderful example of hypocrisy.
tofRobbroolve is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:39 AM   #9
Mello

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Shouldn't striking down any and all child support laws be a liberal talking point?

It fits right in with the rest of their pointless points.
Mello is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:39 AM   #10
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
They can drag your kids wherever they want.

Even if it's been biologically proven that you're not the father, you still have to pay child support after 2 years in California. Why? Because women are whores and the children mustn't suffer for it. This is a bad thing. No, a good thing. No, a bad thing. No...
That shit sucks the BIG ONE. Too!
Just why in the hell should a man pay for a kid that's NOT theirs?
bitymnmictada is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:43 AM   #11
bWxNFI3c

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
That shit sucks the BIG ONE. Too!
Just why in the hell should a man pay for a kid that's NOT theirs?
Because people vote in laws to cause such things.

Meanwhile those same people don't pay their share.

Weird stuff.
bWxNFI3c is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:54 AM   #12
rfceicizgm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
He can apply for social security, and if his disability is as bad as it sounds,
he should be approved for at least three years,
when his case will be reviewed.

My hubby broke his wrist and knee falling off a ladder at my folks ranch,
checking a diesel fuel tank up on a tower,
applied for SSD and was approved for 7 years, I think.
They do the reviews at 3, 5 or 7 years, depending on the extent of the disability.

He WILL have to wait half of forever,
and jump through hoops,
but if he's approved, the payments become retroactive,
and he'll be reimbursed for the months he had to wait.

Did he not subscribe to the short / long term disability insurance through his employment?
If he did, they should cover at least 60% of his salary/average earnings,
regardless of whether the injury was work-related.

I wish him the best of luck, and sure hope he has folks that can afford to "invest" in him.
rfceicizgm is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:54 AM   #13
ImmitsRom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
Because people vote in laws to cause such things.

Meanwhile those same people don't pay their share.

Weird stuff.
It's so easy to tell others how they can spend their money, isn't it?
As a general rule I think we need LESS LAWS-not more.
Do away with, say 70% of the laws we have on the books now and enforce the ones we have left.
Keep it simple.
ImmitsRom is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:56 AM   #14
GWRIeEQp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
However...let some guy that just got crushed, miss a couple payments to the bitch....and the state goes after him hard.

It's a wonderful example of hypocrisy.
It's not hypocricy. It's a man's world. It's a man's, man's, man's, man's world....even when it isn't anymore.
GWRIeEQp is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 07:58 AM   #15
Thunderzee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
It's so easy to tell others how they can spend their money, isn't it?
As a general rule I think we need LESS LAWS-not more.
Do away with, say 70% of the laws we have on the books now and enforce the ones we have left.
Keep it simple.
I agree. The amount of legislation is absurd, but they think they're doing their jobs. 'Look, I helped pass this or that.'
Thunderzee is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 08:01 AM   #16
gogona

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
He can apply for social security, and if his disability is as bad as it sounds,
he should be approved for at least three years,
when his case will be reviewed.

My hubby broke his wrist and knee falling off a ladder at my folks ranch,
checking a diesel fuel tank up on a tower,
applied for SSD and was approved for 7 years, I think.
They do the reviews at 3, 5 or 7 years, depending on the extent of the disability.

He WILL have to wait half of forever,
and jump through hoops,
but if he's approved, the payments become retroactive,
and he'll be reimbursed for the months he had to wait.

Did he not subscribe to the short / long term disability insurance through his employment?
If he did, they should cover at least 60% of his salary/average earnings,
regardless of whether the injury was work-related.

I wish him the best of luck, and sure hope he has folks that can afford to "invest" in him.
If you don't get hurt on the job, tough shit. That's falls on your own private insurance.
gogona is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 08:02 AM   #17
c-cialis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
That shit sucks the BIG ONE. Too!
Just why in the hell should a man pay for a kid that's NOT theirs?
Who else will but tax payers?
c-cialis is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 08:03 AM   #18
Adimondin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Who else will but tax payers?
And that says alot about many men, as well.
Adimondin is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 08:07 AM   #19
hojutok

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
If you don't get hurt on the job, tough shit. That's falls on your own private insurance.
Excuse me,

but I'm LIVING IT,

and not only IS my hubby drawing on it,

I also did during the time I was covered,

for an illness that had nothing to do with my employment.

Short and/or Long Term Disability insurance pays you at least 60% of your salary/average earnings

for (I think) at least 2 years,

and with some, like the company my husband's policy is with,

until retirement age.
hojutok is offline


Old 02-25-2012, 08:08 AM   #20
Promotiona

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
324
Senior Member
Default
And you can ONLY buy this type of insurance THROUGH YOUR EMPLOYER.
Promotiona is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity