[Eh085zE7]

You're penis shriveled and died years ago.

Viagra revived it.

[Hedkffiz]

Viagra revived it.

Only to make you a slave to cunts.

[Dynasty]

Only to make you a slave to cunts.

Does it matter? I hear men are finished.

[Haftdrarp]

Does it matter? I hear men are finished.

Good for us!

[nermise]

One doesn't check feminism by fighting it. In fighting, you create a loser, and hence, a victim, which is power.

No, one annihilates it completely, via refusal to listen, and quiet tolerance in the face of attack. If attacked, you are now the victim. Your attacker transfers that moral authority to you.

Presto! You're now the victim!

You win! And the loser has no basis for the exacting of 'concessions'.

Men have won the sex war. They just don't know it. As they become aware of it, feminism will pass away. And to an accompaniment of grateful female laughter.

And true equality will not be what women have supposed. Left with nothing to gain, and everything to lose, expect that women will turn on feminists; recognising them as far worse than men ever were. Having been the victims for so long, they will cower before the unaccustomed accountability (having finally recognised what it truly means), and seek to turn back the clock in a mad scramble for relief. Only, being too late, and now being the new oppressors, they will seek to humble themselves. To no avail.

To add to their misery, history will record that, just as men were once their tyrants, they have become their emancipators. That the credit is not theirs. The record will reflect that, in the final moments, women burst their guts, trying frantically to halt the 'progression of equality'. And the future generations of women will lament this fact. For fact it shall become. And there will be no solace for them.

What should have been their great victory, shall resound forever as their worst defeat; and one wrought wholly by themselves.

The 'woman's struggle' shall be unmasked as being no more than the same old shit. That what they were doing was no more than that which was done to them. And that they were wilfully complicit in their most sublime defeat.

There has never been a women's struggle. It was always a 'struggle' for men to improve their attitudes. Women could not 'rise up' and 'fight back'. They lack the biology. Had women been capable of doing so, they should not have endured millennia of brutality. No, they could not 'fight back'.

Women will win. And lose.

Big time.

[artenotreah]

The problem is that you are describing "power" in men's terms. Women have always had the upper hand.

We have the magical power of producing life that men have envied so much throughout time-therefore the witch hunts. Yeah, you have a role in it; but so minor...and a few sperm banks make you all redundant...except for certain things.

[13spebampiliece]

The problem is that you are describing "power" in men's terms. Women have always had the upper hand.

We have the magical power of producing life that men have envied so much throughout time-therefore the witch hunts. Yeah, you have a role in it; but so minor...and a few sperm banks make you all redundant...except for certain things.

lol

We keep the sperm banks in business, remember. With biotechnology, both men and women will become redundant eventually.

And I was describing power in power's terms.

[CGECngjA]

Btw, it's not 'magic'.

It's biology. Not unlike a fart.

Only God can 'create life'.

[Ruiceara]

lol

We keep the sperm banks in business, remember. With biotechnology, both men and women will become redundant eventually.

And I was describing power in power's terms.

You mean power in men's terms.
You don't have a clue of women's power. Most women don't have a clue of women's power.

[DoctorAlexandro]

You mean power in men's terms.
You don't have a clue of women's power. Most women don't have a clue of women's power.

Nope. Power in power's terms.

To the contrary, my post shows that I understand it all too well. You're being defensive.

If you're unfamiliar with gender dynamics, look up what feminists call 'theorising backlash'. Even those women have a clue what's on the horizon, and they rationalise away from the implications.

For every action...

[inilbowly]

NIXON IS THE SINGULARITY.


YES, I SAID "IS".


HE'S OUT THERE NOW, FLOATING IN THE NAGUAL,

AND HE'S FUCKED POOR TIM LEARY BOW-LEGGED.

[Usogwdkb]

Men are finished

Usually before women like it's our fault women take longer to orgasm.

[emorbimefed]

Nope. Power in power's terms.

To the contrary, my post shows that I understand it all too well. You're being defensive.

If you're unfamiliar with gender dynamics, look up what feminists call 'theorising backlash'. Even those women have a clue what's on the horizon, and they rationalise away from the implications.

For every action...

Why define women's power in feminists' terms?
They don't have a clue either. I can understand the equal pay for equal work platform, but that's not necessarily feminist, that's just fair practice for any sub group of society.

[Casyimipist]

Usually before women like it's our fault women take longer to orgasm.

Women have orgasms?

[Oberjej]

Why define women's power in feminists' terms?

I wasn't. You need to see how treatment of one factor doesn't, of necessity, implicate the broader theme. I was discussing power in terms of power. Only that. Given the thread context, I can understand what must be a natural antipathy on your part, but I assure you, I have no agenda. I don't take sides. My observations are only ever that.

They don't have a clue either. I can understand the equal pay for equal work platform, but that's not necessarily feminist, that's just fair practice for any sub group of society. Moss, they have more of a clue than you imagine. The fact that you believe otherwise, only underscores their skill.

As to the other, your notion of ideal without agenda is, at best, sweetly naive.

[esenesesinas]

Usually before women like it's our fault women take longer to orgasm.

I pity your wife or anyone you marry.

[Woziwfaq]

UW, I really don't know what you're getting at. Maybe if you proffered some concrete examples, I would better understand your point. In what way do you mean backlash- women refusing to go to work and insisting on staying home with the children? Well, that would be great if the economy could afford that. Most families need two incomes to get along these days. Women intent on fulfilling their "biological imperative?" I don't think so. Certainly you don't mean that women should take a subservient role in the workplace merely because of their gender.

[ananciguinter]

http://youtu.be/hXg6d0BQxik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


ONE PAYS THE OTHER'S TAXES.


IT DOES HELP KEEP DAYCARE CENTERS AND HOUSE CLEANING SERVICES

OPEN.....



AND HELPS MINIMIZE FAMILY TIME TOGETHER.

[tgs]

http://youtu.be/hXg6d0BQxik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FAST FOOD AND PREPARED FOODS BUSINESSES LOVE "WORKING MOMS".

[Xqjfxmfk]

http://youtu.be/hXg6d0BQxik
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WE JUST MIGHT BE BETTER OFF AS AS SOCIETY IF MOST WOMEN

MADE THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS OUT OF THE ECONOMY AND OFF

THE TAX ROLLS.

WOMEN CAN GENERATE A LOT OF WEALTH.... CASH AND OTHERWISE.....


WITHOUT ENTERING THE PAYCHECK ECONOMY AT ALL.


GARDENING

HOME MAKING

CHILD REARING (INCLUDING EDUCATION, BOTH ACADEMIC AND SPIRITUAL)


"SOCIAL WORK"

AND MUCH MORE.

THE BENEFITS OF SUCH ACTIVITY ARE ENORMOUS....

INCALCULABE, IN FACT...


AND THEY ARE NOT TAXED!!!