LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-19-2012, 02:53 AM   #21
Gymnarnemia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
Overcoming dems with a liberal Republican is meaningless. If the Republican Party had a REAL Conservative candidate, you would be excited by him, we would be excited by him, the rest of America would be excited by him and he would destroy Obama in a landslide!!

's not him.
Maybe not, but if we can't get the perfect candidate we can get obama out of power. we will never have the perfect candidate, so we always end up voting against someone--------I am voting against Obama.
Gymnarnemia is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:54 AM   #22
ufUUZCnc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
You said it was campaign rhetoric, that makes all of it questionable. Unless you think that politicians always tell the truth about their opponents.

Which part do you take issue with?
ufUUZCnc is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:54 AM   #23
shenacatro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
Sounds like you, like Hoffa, are giving up and throwing in the towel.
I never said any of this.. Where did you get it?

I said the current direction of the party is a loser.. Any reading comprehension issues are your own.
shenacatro is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:55 AM   #24
Vemnagelignc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default

I have been supporting the only limited gov't, liberty defending candidate in the race. And yes, I believe the people CAN do it. They CAN elect true conservatives and libertarians to office. But YOU throw in the towel, and say it can't be done. YOU!!!

You are the one who has given up on the fundamental principles of conservatism. You are no conservative, my friend. Not even close. So please spare me this rhetoric about giving up. Giving up is dropping your pants for Guy Smiley, and saying, "yes sir, may I have some more?"

I am an issues voter. If you want to discuss issues, fine. But I couldn't give two shits about political parties, or irrational fear of the mulatto. It doesn't do anything for me. So save it for somebody else.
I hear ya, but you have hitched your wagon to a lame old horse. He can't pull it up the hill or even down the hill.

How about an ISSUE to remove the current traitor who occupies the whitehouse? Thats my ISSUE.
Vemnagelignc is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:56 AM   #25
Cd9JfGHR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default

Which part do you take issue with?
Not the point. its campaign rhetoric.
Cd9JfGHR is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:56 AM   #26
TZtrDuso

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
Ultimately, money is the problem..

I sometimes wonder if we pay them enough.. I know it seems counter intuitive, but.. good governance would be worth almost any price.

It's the Monarch theory.
I know. I was thinking about doing a poll thread where the options are no pay, where only passionate volunteers might run, vs massive salaries, to put them beyond bribes.

I tend toward the massive salaries. It would be far cheaper to pay a million per rep, than to pay for all the shenanigans that the lobbyist bribes cost us.
TZtrDuso is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:56 AM   #27
Amerworma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Not the point. its campaign rhetoric.
Ching Chong Potato.
Amerworma is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:57 AM   #28
HexcewlyRette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default
I never said any of this.. Where did you get it?

I said the current direction of the party is a loser.. Any reading comprehension issues are your own.
When you say the GOP is lost and there is no way to stop the liberal movement, that sounds like giving up.

If not, what is it?
HexcewlyRette is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:57 AM   #29
gZAhTyWY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
I hear ya, but you have hitched your wagon to a lame old horse. He can't pull it up the hill or even down the hill.

How about an ISSUE to remove the current traitor who occupies the whitehouse? Thats my ISSUE.
It's not an issue. It's born of irrational fear and a willingness to obey your handlers in the conservative media. I'm not interested in it.
gZAhTyWY is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:58 AM   #30
opdirorg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Ching Chong Potato.
Cheech Chong bing bong.
opdirorg is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:58 AM   #31
GreefeWrereon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
I tend toward the massive salaries. Me too.. Because zero salary excludes all but the very wealthy from serving.
GreefeWrereon is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:58 AM   #32
rvadipoldkov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
It's not an issue. It's born of irrational fear and a willingness to obey your handlers in the conservative media. I'm not interested in it.
horseshit
rvadipoldkov is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 02:59 AM   #33
Pszinygv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
When you say the GOP is lost and there is no way to stop the liberal movement, that sounds like giving up.

If not, what is it?
Uh, show me where I said that..

I don't feel like repeating a complex concept again.. I've typed it all out several times already..
Pszinygv is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:00 AM   #34
Reftsheette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/0uUnA7ySOec
http://youtu.be/C8Ff5OEUzd8
http://youtu.be/U3k4HcvCOS4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GOOD GOVERNANCE WOULD CONSIST OF CITIZEN LEGISLATORS...

SHORT-TERMERS... WHO SPENT THE GREATER BALANCE OF THEIR LIVES

OUT OF GOVERNMENT ...AND PAID THE TAXES THEY LEVIED, IF ANY, AND

LIVED UNDER ANY AND ALL LAWS THEY CREATED.
Reftsheette is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:01 AM   #35
Heessduernbub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
Ultimately, money is the problem..

I sometimes wonder if we pay them enough.. I know it seems counter intuitive, but.. good governance would be worth almost any price.

It's the Monarch theory.
I think if we paid them nothing we'd be better off. Only then would citizens who really care about the Republic serve. 2 year terms, expenses covered, then go back to the farm.
Heessduernbub is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:03 AM   #36
Jadldqys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/0uUnA7ySOec
http://youtu.be/C8Ff5OEUzd8
http://youtu.be/U3k4HcvCOS4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


GIVEN THAT A LEGISLATOR OUGHT TO BE A MATURE AND

EXPERIENCED PERSON OF AT LEAST ORDINARY MEANS,

A SALARY OF $100 K IS FULLY ADEQUATE.

NO BENEFITS.

NO SPECIAL TAX EXEMPTIONS.
Jadldqys is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:04 AM   #37
refsherne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
I think if we paid them nothing we'd be better off. Only then would citizens who really care about the Republic serve. 2 year terms, expenses covered, then go back to the farm.
One way or the other would be better than the current situation, is how I see it. But I tend toward huge salaries, to stave off bribery, and to possibly direct really talented people into politics.
refsherne is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:05 AM   #38
Creva4k

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Forget the pensions and all that stuff, though...
Creva4k is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:06 AM   #39
ChyFDjfed

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/0uUnA7ySOec
http://youtu.be/C8Ff5OEUzd8
http://youtu.be/U3k4HcvCOS4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


GIVEN THAT A LEGISLATOR OUGHT TO BE A MATURE AND

EXPERIENCED PERSON OF AT LEAST ORDINARY MEANS,

A SALARY OF $100 K IS FULLY ADEQUATE.

NO BENEFITS.

NO SPECIAL TAX EXEMPTIONS.


GIVEN THE COMFORT, SPEED, AND EFFICEINCY OF MODERN TRANSPORT,

I SEE NO REASON FOR A LEGISLATOR NOT TO MAINTAIN A PERMANENT

RESIDENCE IN HIS DISTRICT, RATHER THAN IN WASHINGTON.

LET THEM TRAVEL TO THE CAPITOL ON THOSE OCCASIONS WHEN

THE BUSINESS OF CONGRESS REQUIRES IT...AND MAINTAIN

THEIR HOMES ELSEWHERE... AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE.
ChyFDjfed is offline


Old 01-19-2012, 03:07 AM   #40
BuyCheapest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
625
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/0uUnA7ySOec
http://youtu.be/C8Ff5OEUzd8
http://youtu.be/U3k4HcvCOS4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PERISH THE THOUGHT OF A PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATURE.....


WE HAVE A CONGRESS OF PIMPS NOW.
BuyCheapest is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity