Saudi Arabia Wants Nukes - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**aceriscoolon** · 12-30-2011, 01:57 PM

http://www.dallasblog.com/2011120610...lear-arms.html

Geezeus, that's all anybody needs. They'd get them from Pakistan. Nice.

**skupaemauto** · 12-30-2011, 01:58 PM

Mushrooms.

Wave of the future, lads!

**Enjoymms** · 12-30-2011, 02:02 PM

Mushrooms. Wave of the future, lads!

Too big to fit on plates. Won't have to ingest them, they'll ingest you.

**WFSdZuP3** · 12-30-2011, 02:11 PM

NYT Link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/wo...says.html?_r=1

It's for show.. and intended to up the ante on the Obama administration for an intervention. Belligerence from a nuclear Israel and Team USA, Global Cop, does nothing to help deter others from seeking the technology for themselves.

In fact, it makes a pretty good argument for it.. Especially if you happen to be unlucky enough to have resources or be strategically located.

**JoesBro** · 12-30-2011, 02:15 PM

Pakistan is having a hard-enough time controlling their nukes. Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win.

**Optosypoeds** · 12-30-2011, 02:43 PM

Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win.

That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that.

**Blahhhshsh** · 12-31-2011, 12:48 AM

That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that.

Paul is placing that bet as well. It's a dangerous position to take.

I thought the general trend twenty years ago was to reduce world wide atomic weaponry. Now it's a free for all.
I grew up at a time when air raid drills in school were still common. Two countries with mildly sane leaders were in control of the buttons. Now there seems to be some feeling that everyone deserves one, just like a trophy for every team in Pee Wee baseball or something.

There is zero leadership on this shit. And Paul's position is suicidal.

**Nwxffgke** · 12-31-2011, 01:49 AM

Sell them some. Put it into social security.

**Alexunda** · 12-31-2011, 01:51 AM

That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that.

+1

No chance in Hell.

**Viyzarei** · 12-31-2011, 01:55 AM

If your neighbor was acting crazy and breaking into other peoples houses shooting the places up would you want a gun to protect yourself?

**Deribasov** · 12-31-2011, 01:56 AM

If your neighbor was acting crazy and breaking into other peoples houses shooting the places up would you want a gun to protect yourself?

No. I would kill him with my bare hands.
Paul would blame himself for the neighbor's actions and give him the keys to his house.

**Jwskwhdo** · 12-31-2011, 01:57 AM

You're insane.

**feroiodpiop** · 12-31-2011, 01:59 AM

You're insane.

Explain.

**infinkPoode** · 12-31-2011, 06:41 AM

Explain.

He meant "toll".

**Emapymosy** · 12-31-2011, 06:42 AM

...and I meant, "troll".

**hapasaparaz** · 12-31-2011, 06:43 AM

Alright, let's roll.

**Niobaralegra** · 12-31-2011, 06:47 AM

Pakistan is having a hard-enough time controlling their nukes. Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win.

Yes, they would hesitate. Where do these ideas come from? THINK.

**yxn2dC07** · 12-31-2011, 06:49 AM

why would they? How would you prove who provided it

**DumnEuronoumn** · 12-31-2011, 06:52 AM

That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that.

+1

No chance in Hell.

Wouldn't stop them from supplying a nuke to someone who'd do it. Ever think of that?

http://www.bloomberg.com/article/201...OcZ6NT3wo.html

**Nifoziyfar** · 12-31-2011, 07:04 AM

why would they? How would you prove who provided it

Then I'd say Pakistan would be our first concern.

12-30-2011, 01:57 PM	#1
aceriscoolon Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 354 Senior Member	Saudi Arabia Wants Nukes http://www.dallasblog.com/2011120610...lear-arms.html Geezeus, that's all anybody needs. They'd get them from Pakistan. Nice. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-30-2011, 01:58 PM	#2
skupaemauto Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 417 Senior Member	Mushrooms. Wave of the future, lads! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-30-2011, 02:02 PM	#3
Enjoymms Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 610 Senior Member	Mushrooms. Wave of the future, lads! Too big to fit on plates. Won't have to ingest them, they'll ingest you. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-30-2011, 02:11 PM	#4
WFSdZuP3 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 428 Senior Member	NYT Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/wo...says.html?_r=1 It's for show.. and intended to up the ante on the Obama administration for an intervention. Belligerence from a nuclear Israel and Team USA, Global Cop, does nothing to help deter others from seeking the technology for themselves. In fact, it makes a pretty good argument for it.. Especially if you happen to be unlucky enough to have resources or be strategically located. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-30-2011, 02:15 PM	#5
JoesBro Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 368 Senior Member	Pakistan is having a hard-enough time controlling their nukes. Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-30-2011, 02:43 PM	#6
Optosypoeds Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win. That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 12:48 AM	#7
Blahhhshsh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that. Paul is placing that bet as well. It's a dangerous position to take. I thought the general trend twenty years ago was to reduce world wide atomic weaponry. Now it's a free for all. I grew up at a time when air raid drills in school were still common. Two countries with mildly sane leaders were in control of the buttons. Now there seems to be some feeling that everyone deserves one, just like a trophy for every team in Pee Wee baseball or something. There is zero leadership on this shit. And Paul's position is suicidal. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:49 AM	#8
Nwxffgke Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 550 Senior Member	Sell them some. Put it into social security. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:51 AM	#9
Alexunda Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that. +1 No chance in Hell. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:55 AM	#10
Viyzarei Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	If your neighbor was acting crazy and breaking into other peoples houses shooting the places up would you want a gun to protect yourself? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:56 AM	#11
Deribasov Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 375 Senior Member	If your neighbor was acting crazy and breaking into other peoples houses shooting the places up would you want a gun to protect yourself? No. I would kill him with my bare hands. Paul would blame himself for the neighbor's actions and give him the keys to his house. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:57 AM	#12
Jwskwhdo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 487 Senior Member	You're insane. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 01:59 AM	#13
feroiodpiop Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 479 Senior Member	You're insane. Explain. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 06:41 AM	#14
infinkPoode Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 406 Senior Member	Explain. He meant "toll". Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 06:42 AM	#15
Emapymosy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	...and I meant, "troll". Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests)

12-31-2011, 06:43 AM	#16
hapasaparaz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	Alright, let's roll. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 06:47 AM	#17
Niobaralegra Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 453 Senior Member	Pakistan is having a hard-enough time controlling their nukes. Iran won't hesitate to strap one into a suitcase with a Wacko-Bomber eager for the virgins and to wipe some land off the map. No win. Yes, they would hesitate. Where do these ideas come from? THINK. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 06:49 AM	#18
yxn2dC07 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 548 Senior Member	why would they? How would you prove who provided it Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 06:52 AM	#19
DumnEuronoumn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 484 Senior Member	That'd be national suicide.. They won't do that. +1 No chance in Hell. Wouldn't stop them from supplying a nuke to someone who'd do it. Ever think of that? http://www.bloomberg.com/article/201...OcZ6NT3wo.html Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-31-2011, 07:04 AM	#20
Nifoziyfar Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 423 Senior Member	why would they? How would you prove who provided it Then I'd say Pakistan would be our first concern. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote