The Company Ron Paul Keeps: Meet Alex Jones - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**lookanddiscover** · 12-23-2011, 04:24 AM

Paul’s exclusion caused an uproar, with critics alleging that his stand on Israel had earned the RJC’s ire; an absolutist libertarian, Paul opposes foreign aid to all countries, including the Jewish state. “This seems to me more of an attempt to draw boundaries around acceptable policy discourse than any active concern that President Dr. Ron Paul would be actively anti-Israel or anti-Semitic,” wrote Reason editor Matt Welch. Chris McGreal of the Guardian reported that Paul “was barred because of his views on Israel.” Even Seth Lipsky, editor of the New York Sun and a valiant defender of Israel (and friend and mentor of this writer), opined, “The whole idea of an organization of Jewish Republicans worrying about the mainstream strikes me as a bit contradictory.”

While Paul’s views on Israel certainly place him outside the American, never mind Republican, mainstream, there is an even more elementary reason the RJC was right to exclude him from its event. It is Paul’s lucrative and decades-long promotion of bigotry and conspiracy theories, for which he has yet to account fully, and his continuing espousal of extremist views, that should make him unwelcome at any respectable forum, not only those hosted by Jewish organizations. http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html

Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal."

Ron Paul is simply not presidential material.

**adverwork** · 12-23-2011, 05:24 AM

More boo hoo hooing from nigger lovers, let's all cringe in White guilt. "Racism" formerly known as "Truth".

**egershna** · 12-23-2011, 05:28 AM

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html

Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal."

Ron Paul is simply not presidential material.

The newsletters are no big deal.

**Swidemaiskikemu** · 12-23-2011, 05:54 AM

Because maybe Paul did say or do something deemed as racist 20+ years ago, that he expressed crazy ideas with Alex Jones, or that he would prefer to cancel our checks to Israel and other foriegn countries isn't a reason to not vote for him. Even his opinion on allowing Iran to aquire a nuclear weapon isn't a reason.

He's more then fit to be President,
and if he was to be elected President....

He would still have to face a presumably Republican congress initially.
What could he do ? Can Paul really fight a hostile congress ?

**Almolfuncomma** · 12-23-2011, 06:08 AM

The newsletters are no big deal.

Neither are your claims to credibility. Now that that's settled, any plans for Christmas?

**KraskiNetu** · 12-23-2011, 06:10 AM

JAMES KIRCHICK AGAIN.

Seems to be a crusade with him.

**Celeliamend** · 12-23-2011, 06:15 AM

Who Leads the Attack On Ron Paul?
Those with the most to lose: Warmongering corporate fascists.

**rushiddink** · 12-23-2011, 06:23 AM

Neither are your claims to credibility. Now that that's settled, any plans for Christmas?

You first.

**bWxNFI3c** · 12-23-2011, 06:30 AM

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html

Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal."

Ron Paul is simply not presidential material.

Equating Ron Paul's beliefs with the beliefs of the majority of Americans is not a bad thing.

**cbUDaNFRu** · 12-23-2011, 07:23 AM

Isn't there a race war, right now?

**SasortFkire** · 12-23-2011, 07:31 AM

http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E
http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU
http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I
http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4
http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND

http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I HAVEN'T NOTICED ANY MORE THAN THE USUAL SHOOTINGS.

WHO IS IT THIS TIME?

THE ESKIMOS?

JEWS?

THOSE DAMNED JAURISTAS.... AGAIN?

**klnbgqr** · 12-23-2011, 07:34 AM

"Illegal alien" is a slur. I have nothing against Mexicans or Central Americans, but if they are here illegally, they are illegal aliens.
"Anchor Baby" is a slur. The important thing is that the definition does not change, only it's designation. 'Language is important'. Have any Hispanic immigration lawyers represented a European alien? That would make a fantastic docu-comedy.

**pirinosa** · 12-23-2011, 07:34 AM

http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E
http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU
http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I
http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4
http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND

http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I HAVEN'T NOTICED ANY MORE THAN THE USUAL SHOOTINGS.

WHO IS IT THIS TIME?

THE ESKIMOS?

JEWS?

THOSE DAMNED JAURISTAS.... AGAIN?

clockwork

**lopezsokero** · 12-23-2011, 07:37 AM

http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E
http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU
http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I
http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4
http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND

http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MEXICAN DOCUMENTS ARE BEST.... AND MRS. OLSEN KNOWS!!!!

**dexterljohnthefinanceguy** · 12-23-2011, 07:38 AM

http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E
http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU
http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I
http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4
http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND

http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MEXICAN DOCUMENTS ARE BEST.... AND MRS. OLSEN KNOWS!!!!

Yes, because their government is so trustworthy.

**Kimeoffessyr** · 12-23-2011, 07:39 AM

ROMNEY...LET'S GET IT OVER WITH.

THEN BASKETBALL ON TV...!!!!!!!

**TeapseTic** · 12-23-2011, 07:40 AM

THE U.S. CONGRESS IS A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.

**Olympicdreams** · 12-23-2011, 07:41 AM

THEY'LL EAT WHATEVER IS PUT OUT FOR THEM....

ON THEIR LITTLE WHITE HOUSE PLATE.

THEY LIKE ROMNEY... BUT THEY'LL EAT ABSOLUTELY

ANYTHING... EVEN OLD, TOUGH GINGRICH.

**sEe** · 12-23-2011, 07:43 AM

Poor, poor Mexico. Poor, poor rich Mexico City. Who secretly loves the States' love for 'product'.

**Eviftilia** · 12-23-2011, 07:43 AM

THEY'LL EAT WHATEVER IS PUT OUT FOR THEM....

ON THEIR LITTLE WHITE HOUSE PLATE.

THEY LIKE ROMNEY... BUT THEY'LL EAT ABSOLUTELY

ANYTHING... EVEN OLD, TOUGH GINGRICH.

Sharpen your fucking teeth, then.

12-23-2011, 04:24 AM	#1
lookanddiscover Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 527 Senior Member	The Company Ron Paul Keeps: Meet Alex Jones Paul’s exclusion caused an uproar, with critics alleging that his stand on Israel had earned the RJC’s ire; an absolutist libertarian, Paul opposes foreign aid to all countries, including the Jewish state. “This seems to me more of an attempt to draw boundaries around acceptable policy discourse than any active concern that President Dr. Ron Paul would be actively anti-Israel or anti-Semitic,” wrote Reason editor Matt Welch. Chris McGreal of the Guardian reported that Paul “was barred because of his views on Israel.” Even Seth Lipsky, editor of the New York Sun and a valiant defender of Israel (and friend and mentor of this writer), opined, “The whole idea of an organization of Jewish Republicans worrying about the mainstream strikes me as a bit contradictory.” While Paul’s views on Israel certainly place him outside the American, never mind Republican, mainstream, there is an even more elementary reason the RJC was right to exclude him from its event. It is Paul’s lucrative and decades-long promotion of bigotry and conspiracy theories, for which he has yet to account fully, and his continuing espousal of extremist views, that should make him unwelcome at any respectable forum, not only those hosted by Jewish organizations. http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal." Ron Paul is simply not presidential material. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 05:24 AM	#2
adverwork Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 488 Senior Member	More boo hoo hooing from nigger lovers, let's all cringe in White guilt. "Racism" formerly known as "Truth". Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 05:28 AM	#3
egershna Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 411 Senior Member	http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal." Ron Paul is simply not presidential material. The newsletters are no big deal. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 05:54 AM	#4
Swidemaiskikemu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 439 Senior Member	Because maybe Paul did say or do something deemed as racist 20+ years ago, that he expressed crazy ideas with Alex Jones, or that he would prefer to cancel our checks to Israel and other foriegn countries isn't a reason to not vote for him. Even his opinion on allowing Iran to aquire a nuclear weapon isn't a reason. He's more then fit to be President, and if he was to be elected President.... He would still have to face a presumably Republican congress initially. What could he do ? Can Paul really fight a hostile congress ? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 06:08 AM	#5
Almolfuncomma Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 590 Senior Member	The newsletters are no big deal. Neither are your claims to credibility. Now that that's settled, any plans for Christmas? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 06:10 AM	#6
KraskiNetu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 450 Senior Member	JAMES KIRCHICK AGAIN. Seems to be a crusade with him. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 06:15 AM	#7
Celeliamend Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 368 Senior Member	Who Leads the Attack On Ron Paul? Those with the most to lose: Warmongering corporate fascists. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 06:23 AM	#8
rushiddink Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	Neither are your claims to credibility. Now that that's settled, any plans for Christmas? You first. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 06:30 AM	#9
bWxNFI3c Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 539 Senior Member	http://www.weeklystandard.com/articl...ps_613474.html Now that the chips are on the table, we can have a real discussion about Paul's newsletters and his continued discussions with Alex Jones where he talks about some pretty wacky stuff. One thing is for certain: You aren't going to have any credibility if you dismiss the newsletters as "no big deal." Ron Paul is simply not presidential material. Equating Ron Paul's beliefs with the beliefs of the majority of Americans is not a bad thing. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:23 AM	#10
cbUDaNFRu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 451 Senior Member	Isn't there a race war, right now? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:31 AM	#11
SasortFkire Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 377 Senior Member	http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4 http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I HAVEN'T NOTICED ANY MORE THAN THE USUAL SHOOTINGS. WHO IS IT THIS TIME? THE ESKIMOS? JEWS? THOSE DAMNED JAURISTAS.... AGAIN? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:34 AM	#12
klnbgqr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 462 Senior Member	"Illegal alien" is a slur. I have nothing against Mexicans or Central Americans, but if they are here illegally, they are illegal aliens. "Anchor Baby" is a slur. The important thing is that the definition does not change, only it's designation. 'Language is important'. Have any Hispanic immigration lawyers represented a European alien? That would make a fantastic docu-comedy. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:34 AM	#13
pirinosa Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4 http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I HAVEN'T NOTICED ANY MORE THAN THE USUAL SHOOTINGS. WHO IS IT THIS TIME? THE ESKIMOS? JEWS? THOSE DAMNED JAURISTAS.... AGAIN? clockwork Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:37 AM	#14
lopezsokero Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 466 Senior Member	http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4 http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MEXICAN DOCUMENTS ARE BEST.... AND MRS. OLSEN KNOWS!!!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:38 AM	#15
dexterljohnthefinanceguy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 626 Senior Member	http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4 http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MEXICAN DOCUMENTS ARE BEST.... AND MRS. OLSEN KNOWS!!!! Yes, because their government is so trustworthy. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests)

12-23-2011, 07:39 AM	#16
Kimeoffessyr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 514 Senior Member	ROMNEY...LET'S GET IT OVER WITH. THEN BASKETBALL ON TV...!!!!!!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:40 AM	#17
TeapseTic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 517 Senior Member	THE U.S. CONGRESS IS A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:41 AM	#18
Olympicdreams Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 653 Senior Member	THEY'LL EAT WHATEVER IS PUT OUT FOR THEM.... ON THEIR LITTLE WHITE HOUSE PLATE. THEY LIKE ROMNEY... BUT THEY'LL EAT ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING... EVEN OLD, TOUGH GINGRICH. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:43 AM	#19
sEe Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 547 Senior Member	Poor, poor Mexico. Poor, poor rich Mexico City. Who secretly loves the States' love for 'product'. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

12-23-2011, 07:43 AM	#20
Eviftilia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 373 Senior Member	THEY'LL EAT WHATEVER IS PUT OUT FOR THEM.... ON THEIR LITTLE WHITE HOUSE PLATE. THEY LIKE ROMNEY... BUT THEY'LL EAT ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING... EVEN OLD, TOUGH GINGRICH. Sharpen your fucking teeth, then. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote