LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-06-2011, 05:58 AM   #1
lmHVYs8e

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default Major Liberal sociologist made up data for years. To be charged with fraud.
Here's just one example of the kind of tripe this guy got published as phony "science"

"Thinking of meat, does not exactly bring out the best in people, Roos Vonk noted. People who looked at the steak had made selfish choices during a division game, they often chose in their own interest. In imaginary situations, they found themselves more important than others and reacted less social: in a fire they found that they often wished to be saved first, and that they were less willing to help someone who is upset. It was also found that after people eating meat they felt less connected to others, lonely and unpopular" after eating meat.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...ism_as_science


ALSO, he made up facts to support urban spending.. "Finding" as a result of his "science" that Whites are more racist against Blacks in a broken down environment.

These are the kinds of "studies" the libfucks have been waving around FOR YEARS.. They actually believe this shit!

lmHVYs8e is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:12 AM   #2
xochgtlm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
In my class sociology of race/ethnicity my teacher says whites are more racist against blacks.

My teacher said white people used to set up black people to fail by using IQ tests and asking questions with wording only upper class educated whites would understand
as a way to disqualify them for jobs.


I like to watch primetime tv show "what would you do" they always bust someone being racist or discriminating and make them feel ashamed and apologize.

I always wonder if someone did a counter show and then confronted the same person after the primetime crew left and asked the person who got busted being racist why they apologized and if they felt shamed into being politically correct because they were on tv if they would admit it
xochgtlm is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:14 AM   #3
12Dvop4I

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
My teacher said white people used to set up black people to fail by using IQ tests and asking questions with wording only upper class educated whites would understand
as a way to disqualify them for jobs. The tacit admission here: Blacks are FUCKING STUPID and can't read, write or speak as well as whites.

I mean, that's what their accusation boils down to. Blacks just suck goat ass and are a race that needs training wheels...
12Dvop4I is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:15 AM   #4
SiM7W2zi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
The tacit admission here: Blacks are FUCKING STUPID and can't read, write or speak as well as whites.

I mean, that's what their accusation boils down to. Blacks just suck goat ass and are a race that needs training wheels...
I would get an F if I said that in class.
SiM7W2zi is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:34 AM   #5
GooogleGuy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
I would get an F if I said that in class.
That's exactly the point here... deny reality or be ostracized. Political correctness is running amok. A self perpetuating downward spiral.
GooogleGuy is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:35 AM   #6
compiit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
I would get an F if I said that in class.
I'm not suggesting you do that.. Because, you're right. They'd fail you.

But it's the truth, regardless.
compiit is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 06:35 AM   #7
PebydataFeents

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
I would get an F if I said that in class.
I'm not suggesting you do that.. Because, you're right. They'd fail you.

But it's the truth, regardless.
PebydataFeents is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 07:10 AM   #8
twinaircant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
Ends justify the means.
twinaircant is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 03:54 PM   #9
Acalsenunse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
483
Senior Member
Default
To be honest when I was told that I would be "required" under Gen Ed guidelines to take a "diversity" class I felt resentful.

It cost me $417.00 and my choices were race/ethnicity, or gender issues where they study gay lesbian transgender and feminism.

I don't see why that should be required as "basic requirements" alongside math, science & english.

I think it should be an elective but not a requirement.
Acalsenunse is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 04:03 PM   #10
xochex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/5HKAuaU5VlE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FIRE THEM ALL.
xochex is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 05:28 PM   #11
prpaims

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Sociology is the biggest waste of time I have ever spent in my entire college career. I got an A in it because I regurgitated what they wanted to hear and used words and approaches the professor probably didn't even understand. They tend to think that societies can be controlled and manipulated, that studying societies can make us "progress" in the sense of technological and scientific progress in understanding and "manipulating" societies. You are not going to do that with humans. There is just no science in it - after all it is a social "science".

BTW - I would guess almost all sociologists are Left and Liberal.
prpaims is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 05:30 PM   #12
DownloadMan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
633
Senior Member
Default
To be honest when I was told that I would be "required" under Gen Ed guidelines to take a "diversity" class I felt resentful.

It cost me $417.00 and my choices were race/ethnicity, or gender issues where they study gay lesbian transgender and feminism.

I don't see why that should be required as "basic requirements" alongside math, science & english.

I think it should be an elective but not a requirement.
They want to feel important. I don't mind having to take psychology or economics because I enjoyed both, but having to take shit like art and sociology is an utter and complete waste of time. I went to school with people that were brilliant in the physical (real) sciences, but sucked ass at the "touchy feely" classes and that brought down their GPA.
DownloadMan is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 05:34 PM   #13
cQT6nmEc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
Sociology is the biggest waste of time I have ever spent in my entire college career. I got an A in it because I regurgitated what they wanted to hear and used words and approaches the professor probably didn't even understand. They tend to think that societies can be controlled and manipulated, that studying societies can make us "progress" in the sense of technological and scientific progress in understanding and "manipulating" societies. You are not going to do that with humans. There is just no science in it - after all it is a social "science".

BTW - I would guess almost all sociologists are Left and Liberal.
Well I want to take care of elderly people's needs in old folks homes and to be a coordinator the government requires a degree in Sociology.

I don't see why they can't have apprenticeships like the old days and just learn on the job.

However, this sociology class is not even for sociology majors, it is a class required to EVERYONE in Basic requirements, you MUST take a diversity class on race or gender or religious tolerance.

I am not sure when it became a requirement for basics but it seems unfair.
cQT6nmEc is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 05:40 PM   #14
Sensbachtal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
Well I want to take care of elderly people's needs in old folks homes and to be a coordinator the government requires a degree in Sociology.

I don't see why they can't have apprenticeships like the old days and just learn on the job.

However, this sociology class is not even for sociology majors, it is a class required to EVERYONE in Basic requirements, you MUST take a diversity class on race or gender or religious tolerance.

I am not sure when it became a requirement for basics but it seems unfair.
IDK, it seems education is becoming big business (it has with places like University of Phoenix). I am all for a well-rounded education, but come on.

You would think it required a Public Health Degree (which does incorporate a few Sociology classes). I would understand taking a class on World Religions, which I did and liked it (philosophy base ), but not something with "tolerance" at the end. I make up my own mind after observing the facts.
Sensbachtal is offline


Old 11-06-2011, 05:49 PM   #15
Stovegeothnon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
To be honest when I was told that I would be "required" under Gen Ed guidelines to take a "diversity" class I felt resentful.

It cost me $417.00 and my choices were race/ethnicity, or gender issues where they study gay lesbian transgender and feminism.

I don't see why that should be required as "basic requirements" alongside math, science & english.

I think it should be an elective but not a requirement.
It's required because the Marxists who dominate "higher education" use it to indoctrinate people into their ideology. Their tactics can be traced all the way back to the Frankfurt School. Sadly, their strategy is working. That's why we ended up with Obongo.
Stovegeothnon is offline


Old 11-07-2011, 01:09 AM   #16
D6Ri5u13

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
561
Senior Member
Default
It's required because the Marxists who dominate "higher education" use it to indoctrinate people into their ideology. Their tactics can be traced all the way back to the Frankfurt School. Sadly, their strategy is working. That's why we ended up with Obongo.
I think I have been indoctrinated a little bit.

whenever I start to wonder things and ask questions people get really angry.
D6Ri5u13 is offline


Old 11-07-2011, 01:13 AM   #17
dXI9XFOA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
I think I have been indoctrinated a little bit.

whenever I start to wonder things and ask questions people get really angry.
Liberals, especially college professors, don't like to have their beliefs challenged. They get mad because their views won't hold up under the slightest amount of scrutiny. Rather than try trying to defend the indefensible, they just prefer to silence the opposition.
dXI9XFOA is offline


Old 11-07-2011, 01:14 AM   #18
Zugaxxsn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
551
Senior Member
Default
Liberals, especially college professors, don't like to have their beliefs challenged. They get mad because their views won't hold up under the slightest amount of scrutiny. Rather than try trying to defend the indefensible, they just prefer to silence the opposition.
Yeah they do get mad your are right about that.
Zugaxxsn is offline


Old 11-08-2011, 08:39 AM   #19
codecouponqw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default




GLORIA!







.
codecouponqw is offline


Old 11-08-2011, 08:53 PM   #20
plalleste

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
579
Senior Member
Default
Yeah they do get mad your are right about that.
righteous, even, as in, 'how dare you question...?'

they're as rabidly fanatical as any religious extremist: asking questions is an act of heresy.
plalleste is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity