[fapourfasiark]

That is, assuming any of you are for it in the first place, of course...

[XarokLasa]

[janeemljr]

Go get sodomized by an HIV-positive nigger.

[Tibaveriafark]

Amnesia.

[jacknates]

Amnesia.

What's your obsession with that fuckin' word?

[gusecrync]

Marijuana is a "soft" drug isn't it?

I don't take drugs and they really don't appeal to me but people can smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol both of which are bad for you.

[Galsteinbok]

Marijuana is a "soft" drug isn't it?

I don't take drugs and they really don't appeal to me but people can smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol both of which are bad for you.

So, how is weed any different?

[orapope]

What's your obsession with that fuckin' word?

Because you repeat the same questions without cease, despite having already been answered hundreds of times.

[xesvideo]

So, how is weed any different?

It isn't so either they should all be banned or none of them should be banned - makes more sense!

[WrinnaArraple]

Because you repeat the same questions without cease, despite having already been answered hundreds of times.

I'm repeating myself because it's an important fact that is largely ignored in favor of pro-legalization BS. And it's easy for one to say they're a pro-pot non-stoner; it's another thing to actually PROVE it. I'm not asking for a urine sample or anything. All I want is a solid, lengthy argument for legalizing pot and how they can stand by their claims despite not being a stoner.

[usaneisfiecup]

Go get sodomized by an HIV-positive nigger.

Go do some bong hits before you spontaneously combust with all that hatred.

[ZIDouglas]

It isn't so either they should all be banned or none of them should be banned - makes more sense!

I don't see how weed should be legalized along with alcohol and tobacco. Just how many intoxicants does America need?

[Adollobdeb]

So, how is weed any different?

Weed is far less dangerous than both tobacco and alcohol.

[orison]

I don't see how weed should be legalized along with alcohol and tobacco. Just how many intoxicants does America need?

Judging by your posts, we need many more intoxicants.

[Fluivelip]

Go do some bong hits before you spontaneously combust with all that hatred.

No, I don't want to suffer the same fate as your brain.

[Theateetetuig]

Weed is far less dangerous than both tobacco and alcohol.

Yeah, good luck getting a non-stoner to believe that.

[RlUbQU3R]

Judging by your posts, we need many more intoxicants.

And judging by yours, we need more fresh air.

[oranowdenda]

I don't see how weed should be legalized along with alcohol and tobacco. Just how many intoxicants does America need?

If they are all much the same (unhealthy but people choose to have these habits) I don't see why weed would be the only one out of the 3 to be banned.

Banning weed and smoking wouldn't bother me. I don't see what positives people find in them but it is their choice to smoke.

If you are banning things that are unhealthy you could also say that junk food should be banned.

[Sliliashdes]

Yeah, good luck getting a non-stoner to believe that.

It's fact, jack. All you have to do is open your bloodshot eyes and read a few medical websites.

[Thifiadardivy]

I'm repeating myself because it's an important fact that is largely ignored in favor of pro-legalization BS. And it's easy for one to say they're a pro-pot non-stoner; it's another thing to actually PROVE it. I'm not asking for a urine sample or anything. All I want is a solid, lengthy argument for legalizing pot and how they can stand by their claims despite not being a stoner.

We've all given you that a great many times. Certainly, I've lost count of my own efforts to do so.

And how could I 'prove' I'm a pro-legalisation non-stoner? You can't 'prove' you're not a stoner either. I have only your word for it.