Proof that Liberals just make up their own facts. Are impervious to the truth/reality - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**r5YOPDyk** · 11-06-2011, 04:31 PM

No. Kristol said no such thing.

Period.

Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless.
The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion.

**traiffhetl** · 11-06-2011, 04:34 PM

Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless.
The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion.

No, it's not.. They stated, as a fact, that Kristol conceded 2012 to the Democrats.

He did no such thing. At all.. Period.

**EbrsaRynleot** · 11-06-2011, 05:33 PM

What a chimp out by J.

**bestcigsnick** · 11-06-2011, 06:33 PM

What a chimp out by J.

No chimp out here.. Liberals are chimping, claiming Kristol is throwing them the Presidential race over a year before the election.

They just invent shit like this all the time. It's because they have basic problems with reality.

I do realize the sheer stupidity of the libs leaves you precious little else in the way of a response, however..

**dmitrynts** · 11-07-2011, 12:42 AM

No, it's not.. They stated, as a fact, that Kristol conceded 2012 to the Democrats.

He did no such thing. At all.. Period.

OK. I get that. But they're just stupid.

**StitlyDute** · 11-07-2011, 06:42 PM

"The Raw Story".

Who reads that crap anyway?

You're right about Liberals, Hoffa.

**Britfunclubs** · 11-07-2011, 06:43 PM

Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless.
The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion.

Reading both pieces, it appeared to me that Kristol was giving opinion, and the Raw Story fool was giving what he deems to be fact.

11-06-2011, 04:31 PM	#21
r5YOPDyk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 442 Senior Member	No. Kristol said no such thing. Period. Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless. The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-06-2011, 04:34 PM	#22
traiffhetl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 406 Senior Member	Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless. The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion. No, it's not.. They stated, as a fact, that Kristol conceded 2012 to the Democrats. He did no such thing. At all.. Period. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-06-2011, 05:33 PM	#23
EbrsaRynleot Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 543 Senior Member	What a chimp out by J. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-06-2011, 06:33 PM	#24
bestcigsnick Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 474 Senior Member	What a chimp out by J. No chimp out here.. Liberals are chimping, claiming Kristol is throwing them the Presidential race over a year before the election. They just invent shit like this all the time. It's because they have basic problems with reality. I do realize the sheer stupidity of the libs leaves you precious little else in the way of a response, however.. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-07-2011, 12:42 AM	#25
dmitrynts Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 448 Senior Member	No, it's not.. They stated, as a fact, that Kristol conceded 2012 to the Democrats. He did no such thing. At all.. Period. OK. I get that. But they're just stupid. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-07-2011, 06:42 PM	#26
StitlyDute Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 485 Senior Member	"The Raw Story". Who reads that crap anyway? You're right about Liberals, Hoffa. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-07-2011, 06:43 PM	#27
Britfunclubs Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 361 Senior Member	Correct. But Kristol's piece is opinion, laced with facts but opinion nontheless. The Dimwitted follow up is opinion too, incorrectly assuming what Kristol was talking about, but also opinion. Reading both pieces, it appeared to me that Kristol was giving opinion, and the Raw Story fool was giving what he deems to be fact. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)