Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
17,000 years ago White Europeans known as Solutreans, discovered & settled North America, long BEFORE the Indians
The White Solutreans: North America's FIRST inhabitants Download and reupload these videos to your youtube account today before they vanish. No more nonsense that "Whites Stole the Land from the Indians". We Whites were here thousands of years BEFORE the Indians! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
This is junk anthropology at it's best
The entire canard is based on a similarity between so called "Solutrean" and Clovis tools, which depends on the idea that every possible tool derived from Asia has been uncovered and documented, which certainly is not the case The other problem is, NO OTHER similarity exists between the so called "Solutrean" and Clovis cultures. The idea that they shared tool making, and NO other customs or skillz is absurd. This is not to mention the fact that an Atlantic crossing with the know how and technology of 15,000 BC is all but impossible to have taken place |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
This is junk anthropology at it's best |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Da firss Yuropeans wuz black! |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
17,000 years ago White Europeans known as Solutreans, discovered & settled North America, long BEFORE the Indians SHIT. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
17,000 years ago White Europeans known as Solutreans, discovered & settled North America, long BEFORE the Indians |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Please. There's no politics here. It's all logic and math.
I think it's obvious that this planet we refer to as Earth is only a few thousand years old and that Young Earth Creationists are the folks heading in the right direction. Plate tectonics and Pangaea require a planet full of erosion-free periods. Billions of years are needed without heavy rain, typhoons, hurricanes, monsoons, etc... to construct a past that allows continental drift of landmasses that are within similar area to current continents. Primitive man did not have the luxury of the bulldozer, or the dredger, or even the backhoe to replenish beach shoreline. The oceans disappear when you calculate the math backwards into the theoretical distant past. ![]() Check out this interesting video. Here is something most people don't consider; the age of a part of the current reality as we sense it is not at all important when discussing the planet and heavens. Genesis 1 : 1, 2 1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Genesis does not specify any chemical element makeups or make any effort to compose a compound heavy concoction of matter attributes outside of a simple general description. EXAMPLE 1: If you take a rock that is apparently billions of years old and put it in the bucket of a dumper truck with other rocks with ages in the supposed billions of years, you then have a truck load of really really really old rocks. NOW when you create a driveway or a path the very next day with that really really really old gravel... then you have a driveway or path that is just a day old composed of really really really old rocks. EXAMPLE 2: You buy some legos ten years ago and put them in the toybox. Tomorrow you take out the ten year old legos and make an airplane. You now have a day old airplane you made with ten-year-old legos. So a God being took some ageless particles and stir it up to make what you see today. ALSO if God made man in his image then that means that Adam was God's twin in a way. AND that also means that Adam looked like Jesus, since Jesus is God. DISCUSS. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
![]() http://youtu.be/Rr2YEsymZis http://youtu.be/6mTFtwGUrMs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://youtu.be/_uk0XVt_dpA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NOT QUITE, GERBERT. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|