LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-29-2011, 05:19 PM   #21
propolo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
Any society truly based on freedom and liberty would not allow a government to dictate which substances its citizens can and cannot ingest. Period.
propolo is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 05:20 PM   #22
Chubrehege

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Any society truly based on freedom and liberty would not allow a government to dictate which substances its citizens can and cannot ingest. Period.
Says the stoner.
Chubrehege is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 05:25 PM   #23
Logaleta

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
How many non-smokers support legalization?
lol

That's right. You ran from this question last time, didn't you?

I'm a non-smoker who supports legalisation. There ya go. That's one. And you can't find even one person who ever died from marijuana intoxication, since nonesuch exists.
Logaleta is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 05:52 PM   #24
DioraMoostebeers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://youtu.be/TV2f2-puhjw
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://youtu.be/-KZMg-fvn-s
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://youtu.be/_uk0XVt_dpA SAM COOKE
http://youtu.be/Eg7l7UEYMOI GREEN DOOR
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


IT'S JUST A PATHETIC LITTLE HAIRLESS TWINK ....

OBSESSIVELY SUCKING IT'S OWN SHIT... STRAIGHT

FROM ITS OWN SLOPPY ASS-HOLE.
DioraMoostebeers is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 06:20 PM   #25
MiniBoy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
I haven't been high since 1984, It should be lagalized but regulated as alchohol is.
MiniBoy is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 06:21 PM   #26
mikajuise

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
I don't smoke either.
mikajuise is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 06:53 PM   #27
houkbsdov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
lol

That's right. You ran from this question last time, didn't you?

I'm a non-smoker who supports legalisation. There ya go. That's one. And you can't find even one person who ever died from marijuana intoxication, since nonesuch exists.
I never said you could die from weed intoxication. When I say deadly, I'm talking about lung cancer. You can't document that type of stuff. Can you find a database of people who have died from lung cancer because they smoked tobacco? No. So, why would such a database exist for weed smokers?
houkbsdov is offline


Old 08-29-2011, 08:11 PM   #28
alexosnasos2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
596
Senior Member
Default
This question is a waste of bandwidth. We've given him examples before, but she just denies them.
alexosnasos2 is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 12:18 AM   #29
drycleden

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
I never said you could die from weed intoxication. When I say deadly, I'm talking about lung cancer. You can't document that type of stuff. Can you find a database of people who have died from lung cancer because they smoked tobacco? No. So, why would such a database exist for weed smokers?
You're attempting to flee, but there are no doors.

You said marijuana is a 'lethal' intoxicant. Such is it's lethality, that in the entire history of recorded medicine, not one single cause of death has ever been attributed to it. That's a fact.

You're right in that smoking cannot be proven to cause lung cancer, but it can be shown to correlate so strongly with tobacco usage, that any association is so statistically overwhelming as to be conclusive. Not so with marijuana.

Not one single death. Ever. Deal with that.
drycleden is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 01:13 AM   #30
leangarance

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
Says the stoner.
Says the fascist.
leangarance is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 01:41 AM   #31
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
Says the fascist.
"499"

Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:04 AM   #32
DF9sLGSU

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
The FACT that marijuana increases the diameter of bronchi in a manner unlike that of standard anti asthmatic agents, made its further investigation desirable. If you search for studies about the correlation between cannibals use and lung cancer, the studies show that its not harmful to the human body.

That being said, there is an extremely high correlation between smoking and cancer, but tobacco only, not marijuana. So no, we cabt 'prove' that smoking causes lung cancer, but we can observe that you are much more likely to get lung cancer if you are a tobacco smoker.
DF9sLGSU is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:08 AM   #33
BartRonalds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
The FACT that marijuana increases the diameter of bronchi in a manner unlike that of standard anti asthmatic agents, made its further investigation desirable. If you search for studies about the correlation between cannibals use and lung cancer, the studies show that its not harmful to the human body.

That being said, there is an extremely high correlation between smoking and cancer, but tobacco only, not marijuana. So no, we cabt 'prove' that smoking causes lung cancer, but we can observe that you are much more likely to get lung cancer if you are a tobacco smoker.
BartRonalds is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:10 AM   #34
mr.calisto

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
what? cannibals are great for the heart, stomach and lungs....
mr.calisto is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:13 AM   #35
WhiliaStelt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
482
Senior Member
Default
what? cannibals are great for the heart, stomach and lungs....
That's the rumour.
WhiliaStelt is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:57 AM   #36
Colorostikse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
The FACT that marijuana increases the diameter of bronchi in a manner unlike that of standard anti asthmatic agents, made its further investigation desirable. If you search for studies about the correlation between cannibals use and lung cancer, the studies show that its not harmful to the human body.

That being said, there is an extremely high correlation between smoking and cancer, but tobacco only, not marijuana. So no, we cabt 'prove' that smoking causes lung cancer, but we can observe that you are much more likely to get lung cancer if you are a tobacco smoker.
You're still here?
Colorostikse is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:58 AM   #37
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
You missed me, didnt you?
Kamendoriks is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 02:58 AM   #38
fenter1

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
360
Senior Member
Default
I'm a fascist.
Of the worst kind.
fenter1 is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 03:00 AM   #39
Calluffence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
I'm a fascist of the worst kind.
Apparently.

Why do you libs all hate freedom and liberty? Does it scare you?
Calluffence is offline


Old 08-30-2011, 03:04 AM   #40
THOUTHCAW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
Apparently.

Why do you libs all hate freedom and liberty? Does it scare you?
I'm not a fucking lib. Libs like you are the ones who can't function without dope and try to change the drug laws to appeal to you while further restricting the rights of those who aren't stoners.
THOUTHCAW is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity