Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Contraception could be free under health care law
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20101031/D9J6QV8O0.html WASHINGTON (AP) - Fifty years after the pill, another birth control revolution may be on the horizon: free contraception for women in the U.S., thanks to the new health care law. "Reasonableness" "Sanity" |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
![]() Well birth control isn't abortions. So I hold no strong emotion toward it being provided as I'd rather birth control be cheaper and more avaliable, even at the taxpayer's expense. Thats something that effects everybody. Whilest I can certainly see a capitalist's argument that "I don't pay money so you can avoid getting pregnant". Yeah well... I don't pay to hire cops to protect your sorry ass, I don't pay to have a chance for your kids to go to school, I don't pay for you. I pay for me... because public utility WORKS... We should be suspicious of any side claiming to be looking out for anyone but themselves. You think I trust the prochoice for one second? Hell no. You read the article. They said pills and condoms are child's play, and we need to move on to implants and IUDs. What they want, is for people to get inline for steralization. I'm onto them... The right just wants free money. God forbid an insurance company should actually cover something once in awhile. I mean really. What the fuck do you pay them for if they never cover anything? It's such a stigma to be uninsured, yet what bennefit does insurance actually pose? The least it could do is this!!! If anything, making birth control a feesible avenue for insurance coverage will give the prolife some leverage to illegalize abortions. The prochoice cannot keep hiding under the pretense contraception is not avaliable. It's practically like getting tylenol. This will only further prove that, and eventually even the most mornic, nascar watching dipshit will stop buying into their crap. Their only real defense is women should have a right to kill their baby. Which if you've read my blogs on facebook, I'd argue the opposite. It should be the kids deciding whether or not to abort their parents. And I don't mean when they're so senile, it doesn't even matter anyway!!! ![]() Johffa_X, you claim to be a buisnessman. So clearly you understand economics. Lets say through capitalism, competition, blahblahblah... birth control costs... I don't know... fifty dollars for a month's supply. What if through taxation, it could cost you ten dollars a month? I suppose if you want to get technical, it's costing alot more then the innitial fourty dollars, but it's not costing YOU the extra fourty dollars. Maybe fractions of a cent in tax revenue. So all in all, state economics work. It reduces the brunt of costs from the individual and spreads it out so that noone really feels the sting... Whats so bad about making everyone pay a dollar, so no one person has to pay fifty dollars for birth control??? Thats how any reasonable and or sane person would think. Assuming they didn't learn all their facts from Ayn Rand or Ron Paul. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Johffa_X, you claim to be a buisnessman. So clearly you understand economics. Lets say through capitalism, competition, blahblahblah... birth control costs... I don't know... fifty dollars for a month's supply. Economy of scale doesn't matter.. It's the idea that I am responsible for what my neighbors do in their bedroom? What the hell else am I supposed to be responsible for? Cops? I thought they kept everybody safe? Not just my fucking, deadbeat neighbors.. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|