[tsaaapla]

Someone kidnap this bitch and turn her into a Korean sex slave. Because she is useless as an anchor woman. You know, I watch msnbc under the assumption maybe I'll get lucky and see a leftwing person who isn't a complete joke. But nope, not in this country...

One thing is being a liberal leftist. Another thing is basing an entire hour of your show around a lie. Wahwah, George Tiller was killed by Scott Roeder! Good... The man was a scumbag. I hope more abortion doctors die.

You can't even argue "maybe abortion is moral but it's legal". No, George Tiller didn't give a fuck about the law and was doing late term abortions anyway. Or the proper term... infanticide.

And everyone knows I'm not touchy feely conservative. I don't give a fuck about babies. But it's just so sickening to keep pretending this issue has anything to do with freedom of choice. Really? Is that why smoking has so many regulations? It's that why you can get a ticket for parking in a handicapped spot? Because we just care so deeply about freedom that we're willing to take the moral reprocussions???

No, you are a nigger. The elite thinks of you as an expendable nigger, and your baby is the biggest nigger of them all. That is the truth. The truth is, prior to Roe vs Wade, abortion was still legal in all states, just much more reasonable restricted down to rape and life endangerment mostly. What a quincidence... this is the exucse the "left" uses, yet if this were true, why would they bother???

It gets better... Margat Sanger? Total white supramacist. Probably sucked a few klansmembers dicks, and went on record for saying she wanted to get rid of the "undesirables". The only difference between the liberal left and the real left, is the real left has enough balls to admit you ain't got a fucking choice. The liberal left thinks they can persuade you to kill your baby, to drive down your spics and gooks and promote the white ayran race. They're your friend, they're just here to help you...

It's so pretencious and revolting. That's reason enough to bomb their fucking butcheries. But no, there's still more!

Roe vs Wade was based off a lie!!! The constitution does not say anything about right to privacy. If it did, Facebook would be public enemy number one. It says you have a right not to be searched without a warrant, but that's obviously different.




Or the fact that Jane Roe is now prolife. She sound find Christ, blahblahblah, (frankly it's going to take alot more then finding Christ. This bitch should be louder and stop hiding behind God like all the rest of the Christian right cowards. Bomb the churches too if you ask me...) But no, this is not the worst part. Despite all this evidence of foul play, all this deception, lies, and nefarious intent... No, there is something that tops all of it!!!


Jane Roe admitted that her rape case, was a lie. This is VERY significant, because she was pushed by "prochoice" groups to lie to the supreme court, and say she had been raped. Boohoohoo, and it worked. But the fact that she wasn't, should THROW OUT Roe vs Wade right then and there. (You know... if it weren't for the fact that you didn't throw it out already because there's no right to privacy)

But all this, and the pro-abortion crowd just doesn't care. They either choose to ignore the truth, or disregard the truth. For them, abortion is a convience they aren't to giveup. And Rachel Maddow could've proven you can be leftwing, without being a fucking tool, and she didn't. Perfect reason she shouldn't have choice in anything...

But you know, I blame the left. The real left like myself for not defending the actions of people like Scott Roeder. I blame the real left for not coming out because we fear too much we won't get our revolution if we don't cater to subhuman trash on the liberal left. But if you ask me, there isn't a revolution worth having if that's whom you have to share it with.

Too many on the left these days are nothing more then armchair liberals who need to be strungup on the rope even higher then the capitalists. Preventing a revolution, and spreading the message to the uneducated workers. Because they are small, petty bourgoise. Who cling to their false freedoms of abortion and promiscuiety. When did the left start compromising to a bunch of fags and cunts? This isn't Vladmir Lenin, Chariman Mao, this isn't even FDR or Harry Truman! If anything's a fucking abortion, it's the western concept of the left. A frankenstien abortion that's hobbling around, growling, destroying everything in it's path that would be remotely good!

The longer people favor abortion, the longer it will take to get those daycare centers, those maternity leaves, wasn't it Hillary Clinton who said it takes a village to raise a child? She didn't invent the phrase, but claimed she fealt that way. Would the same village abort said child? Actually that'd be the pure communist thing to do. But don't tell the kids at RevLeft that. They might cry... that since noone "OWNS", noone can go around making decisions like it has no consequinces. A woman doesn't "own" her body, she doesn't own shit. Therefore it is "the village" that decides the life and death of a child.

I admit it's not exactly what I'd want, but you know what? Atleast it's the truth. That's where communism, and you need to know that shit so you can decide if communism is right for you. Thats the message I try to spread, and thats why even us communists don't get a-fucking long! (They could still refrain from banning me... but what do you want me to say? They're arrogant dicks...)




You can say I'm alot of things. Homphobic, misogynist, maybe even a sociopath... I'd take it as a compliment. But one thing I'm not is a liar, and those things I said above, you can go do your own research if you don't believe me. Lord knows you wouldn't listen to the links I showed you anyway. I know how stubborn the average person is. So do it at your own retarded pace, and figure it out.

In all honesty, is the left, the fake left anyway, was interested in "reducing abortions" rather then "illegalizing abortions". Then reduce them the same way you reduce carbon footprint, price gouging, corruption, embezzlement, and all the other shit you don't like. You seem to have no problem waving that tax, regulation, and keysian pen at everything else. Why abortion? You afraid of losing the woman vote? You afraid of pissing off your eugenicist overlords? What the fuck's up?

Thats the kind of questions we need to ask. And start asking with bullets if need be. That's going to be my exact position if I decide to run for any form of office in 2012. I'm going to be an open communist, and remind people what the real left looks like. We don't take no shit. Frankly I think republicans, Christians, and all the rest are in on it. I think Jesse Jackson, (the forum member, not the pastor... though maybe the pastor too) is every bit as prochoice as Obamamerican or the other prochoice trolls at AWE.

I think, like the fake left. He thinks I'm an idiot, and thinks I give a shit about his sob story, or that I'm going to fall for his alligator tears of agreeing with me whilest doing nothing about the problem. I don't got the kind of time to lie like that. Unlike the religious ghouls of this country... homosexuality, femenism, and abortions actually bother me!

This rant will make sense to those who watched the rachel maddow show tonight. And how I wish I'd get a call from a major news network to show them a real leftwing slant...

Or at the very least could blow the fucking head's off some moderators and get a documentry about how I'm the victim. Where the fuck is my freedom of choice?! A woman fucks like a whore, and gets to kill a baby. I get permanently censored and degraded simply for having a hostile opinion, and I don't give squat. That's going to change.

[slima]

Good lord man, do you really expect me to read the whole thing?

I disagree with you on Abortion. Infanticide is not an accurate term as Fetuses are not Infants. Fetuscide would be a more accurate word, although I just made it up, like the rest of you made up Infanticide. A baby is considered an infant between birth and 1 year of age.

So when women are marrying 1 day to 1 year old babies, then you can call it infanticide, until then no.

I'm sorry if this offends someone's sensibilities, but I see the Fetus as more of an organ of the Mother, reliant on her for function and continued life.

I don't think they should be thought of as people until they can sustain their lives, on their own, for any amount of time at all, as born babies do.

Does anyone here remember when you were a Fetus? I certainly don't, and while I don't believe in killing life, we do it to animals all the time. Sometimes killing surplus subhuman matter is practical.

To me this is a catch 22 to republicans, is that they complain all night long about people on welfare, yet they say that if you are on welfare, and you get pregnant, you must have another child, another person on welfare. The obvious point that a Republican would make, is don't get pregnant, but if someone is on welfare in the first place generally, they are too stupid to not get pregnant.

So if someone is anti abortion, and anti welfare, which many are, then you actually support adding more people to the welfare dole, when the alternative is abortion happening.

[WoCTrt0X]

Good lord man, do you really expect me to read the whole thing?

I disagree with you on Abortion. Infanticide is not an accurate term as Fetuses are not Infants. Fetuscide would be a more accurate word, although I just made it up, like the rest of you made up Infanticide. A baby is considered an infant between birth and 1 year of age.

So when women are marrying 1 day to 1 year old babies, then you can call it infanticide, until then no.

I'm sorry if this offends someone's sensibilities, but I see the Fetus as more of an organ of the Mother, reliant on her for function and continued life.

I don't think they should be thought of as people until they can sustain their lives, on their own, for any amount of time at all, as born babies do.

Does anyone here remember when you were a Fetus? I certainly don't, and while I don't believe in killing life, we do it to animals all the time. Sometimes killing surplus subhuman matter is practical.

To me this is a catch 22 to republicans, is that they complain all night long about people on welfare, yet they say that if you are on welfare, and you get pregnant, you must have another child, another person on welfare. The obvious point that a Republican would make, is don't get pregnant, but if someone is on welfare in the first place generally, they are too stupid to not get pregnant.

So if someone is anti abortion, and anti welfare, which many are, then you actually support adding more people to the welfare dole, when the alternative is abortion happening.

Fetus is not an infant? Leave it alone and see what you have in 9 months. You are not a man, because being a man means having the ability to think and have empathy. A baby is a baby. Killing one in the birth canal, as any other abortion, is murder premeditated, and worthy of the death of the offenders, let along critters who kill babys and sell baby body parts for cash. Lots of baby blood for matzo balls eh?

[avdddcxnelkaxz]

By that logic sperm and egg are infants too, because they will eventually form a person. You say a baby is a baby, yet you don't seem to know the medical definition of the word "baby".

You are not a man, because you choose to empathize with an unborn child, while I empathize with real talking breathing people.

[Xxedxevh]

By that logic sperm and egg are infants too, because they will eventually form a person. You say a baby is a baby, yet you don't seem to know the medical definition of the word "baby".

You are not a man, because you choose to empathize with an unborn child, while I empathize with real talking breathing people.

No you are guilty by agreement with murderers. When the heart starts beating it's a baby. As you said. "you choose to empathize with an unborn child," exactly, yes I do.

[allachakb]

I agree that morally there isn't a whole lot of difference between killing a fetus, and killing a born baby, but Practically, there is a HUGE difference.

Trying to keep every baby from accidental pregnancies is simply not practical.

So by your logic of the heart beating means it's sacred, does that mean we can't kill animals, they have beating hearts. Between a fetus and a dog, both have beating hearts, and are not really people.
If you say we can't kill unborn fetuses, then I suggest we draw one clear line. If it has a heart, it beats, and you kill it, you are a murderer. Practically this makes no sense, but it appears to be the way you look at it.

[eXC3Kvnn]

I don't need some CRACKPOT like Jim Profit telling me how to live my life. It's clear to me that he is incapable of so much as one lucid thought, therefore I will leave him to his own nonsensical blather.

[Eromaveabeara]

I agree that morally there isn't a whole lot of difference between killing a fetus, and killing a born baby, but Practically, there is a HUGE difference.

Trying to keep every baby from accidental pregnancies is simply not practical.

So by your logic of the heart beating means it's sacred, does that mean we can't kill animals, they have beating hearts. Between a fetus and a dog, both have beating hearts, and are not really people.
If you say we can't kill unborn fetuses, then I suggest we draw one clear line. If it has a heart, it beats, and you kill it, you are a murderer. Practically this makes no sense, but it appears to be the way you look at it.

I'd rather keep a littler of pups around than "Ole Jimbo!"

[Clilmence]

the very 1st thing the little zygot does after the sperm cracks the egg is attach itself to the womb wall and starts to feed.

It does this because it wants to live.

Killing it is murder.

do not be stupid.


jews love killing our babies in the womb.

[AgJ5mNXM]

the very 1st thing the little zygot does after the sperm cracks the egg is attach itself to the womb wall and starts to feed.

It does this because it wants to live.

Killing it is murder.

do not be stupid.


jews love killing our babies in the womb.

If the standards of murder are killing a being who wants to live, then you are a mass murderer for all the bugs and bacteria you've killed over the years.

Zygot < Mother

[Vigeommighica]

Someone kidnap this bitch and turn her into a Korean sex slave. Because she is useless as an anchor woman. You know, I watch msnbc under the assumption maybe I'll get lucky and see a leftwing person who isn't a complete joke. But nope, not in this country...

One thing is being a liberal leftist. Another thing is basing an entire hour of your show around a lie. Wahwah, George Tiller was killed by Scott Roeder! Good... The man was a scumbag. I hope more abortion doctors die.

You can't even argue "maybe abortion is moral but it's legal". No, George Tiller didn't give a fuck about the law and was doing late term abortions anyway. Or the proper term... infanticide.

And everyone knows I'm not touchy feely conservative. I don't give a fuck about babies. But it's just so sickening to keep pretending this issue has anything to do with freedom of choice. Really? Is that why smoking has so many regulations? It's that why you can get a ticket for parking in a handicapped spot? Because we just care so deeply about freedom that we're willing to take the moral reprocussions???

No, you are a nigger. The elite thinks of you as an expendable nigger, and your baby is the biggest nigger of them all. That is the truth. The truth is, prior to Roe vs Wade, abortion was still legal in all states, just much more reasonable restricted down to rape and life endangerment mostly. What a quincidence... this is the exucse the "left" uses, yet if this were true, why would they bother???

It gets better... Margat Sanger? Total white supramacist. Probably sucked a few klansmembers dicks, and went on record for saying she wanted to get rid of the "undesirables". The only difference between the liberal left and the real left, is the real left has enough balls to admit you ain't got a fucking choice. The liberal left thinks they can persuade you to kill your baby, to drive down your spics and gooks and promote the white ayran race. They're your friend, they're just here to help you...

It's so pretencious and revolting. That's reason enough to bomb their fucking butcheries. But no, there's still more!

Roe vs Wade was based off a lie!!! The constitution does not say anything about right to privacy. If it did, Facebook would be public enemy number one. It says you have a right not to be searched without a warrant, but that's obviously different.




Or the fact that Jane Roe is now prolife. She sound find Christ, blahblahblah, (frankly it's going to take alot more then finding Christ. This bitch should be louder and stop hiding behind God like all the rest of the Christian right cowards. Bomb the churches too if you ask me...) But no, this is not the worst part. Despite all this evidence of foul play, all this deception, lies, and nefarious intent... No, there is something that tops all of it!!!


Jane Roe admitted that her rape case, was a lie. This is VERY significant, because she was pushed by "prochoice" groups to lie to the supreme court, and say she had been raped. Boohoohoo, and it worked. But the fact that she wasn't, should THROW OUT Roe vs Wade right then and there. (You know... if it weren't for the fact that you didn't throw it out already because there's no right to privacy)

But all this, and the pro-abortion crowd just doesn't care. They either choose to ignore the truth, or disregard the truth. For them, abortion is a convience they aren't to giveup. And Rachel Maddow could've proven you can be leftwing, without being a fucking tool, and she didn't. Perfect reason she shouldn't have choice in anything...

But you know, I blame the left. The real left like myself for not defending the actions of people like Scott Roeder. I blame the real left for not coming out because we fear too much we won't get our revolution if we don't cater to subhuman trash on the liberal left. But if you ask me, there isn't a revolution worth having if that's whom you have to share it with.

Too many on the left these days are nothing more then armchair liberals who need to be strungup on the rope even higher then the capitalists. Preventing a revolution, and spreading the message to the uneducated workers. Because they are small, petty bourgoise. Who cling to their false freedoms of abortion and promiscuiety. When did the left start compromising to a bunch of fags and cunts? This isn't Vladmir Lenin, Chariman Mao, this isn't even FDR or Harry Truman! If anything's a fucking abortion, it's the western concept of the left. A frankenstien abortion that's hobbling around, growling, destroying everything in it's path that would be remotely good!

The longer people favor abortion, the longer it will take to get those daycare centers, those maternity leaves, wasn't it Hillary Clinton who said it takes a village to raise a child? She didn't invent the phrase, but claimed she fealt that way. Would the same village abort said child? Actually that'd be the pure communist thing to do. But don't tell the kids at RevLeft that. They might cry... that since noone "OWNS", noone can go around making decisions like it has no consequinces. A woman doesn't "own" her body, she doesn't own shit. Therefore it is "the village" that decides the life and death of a child.

I admit it's not exactly what I'd want, but you know what? Atleast it's the truth. That's where communism, and you need to know that shit so you can decide if communism is right for you. Thats the message I try to spread, and thats why even us communists don't get a-fucking long! (They could still refrain from banning me... but what do you want me to say? They're arrogant dicks...)




You can say I'm alot of things. Homphobic, misogynist, maybe even a sociopath... I'd take it as a compliment. But one thing I'm not is a liar, and those things I said above, you can go do your own research if you don't believe me. Lord knows you wouldn't listen to the links I showed you anyway. I know how stubborn the average person is. So do it at your own retarded pace, and figure it out.

In all honesty, is the left, the fake left anyway, was interested in "reducing abortions" rather then "illegalizing abortions". Then reduce them the same way you reduce carbon footprint, price gouging, corruption, embezzlement, and all the other shit you don't like. You seem to have no problem waving that tax, regulation, and keysian pen at everything else. Why abortion? You afraid of losing the woman vote? You afraid of pissing off your eugenicist overlords? What the fuck's up?

Thats the kind of questions we need to ask. And start asking with bullets if need be. That's going to be my exact position if I decide to run for any form of office in 2012. I'm going to be an open communist, and remind people what the real left looks like. We don't take no shit. Frankly I think republicans, Christians, and all the rest are in on it. I think Jesse Jackson, (the forum member, not the pastor... though maybe the pastor too) is every bit as prochoice as Obamamerican or the other prochoice trolls at AWE.

I think, like the fake left. He thinks I'm an idiot, and thinks I give a shit about his sob story, or that I'm going to fall for his alligator tears of agreeing with me whilest doing nothing about the problem. I don't got the kind of time to lie like that. Unlike the religious ghouls of this country... homosexuality, femenism, and abortions actually bother me!

This rant will make sense to those who watched the rachel maddow show tonight. And how I wish I'd get a call from a major news network to show them a real leftwing slant...

Or at the very least could blow the fucking head's off some moderators and get a documentry about how I'm the victim. Where the fuck is my freedom of choice?! A woman fucks like a whore, and gets to kill a baby. I get permanently censored and degraded simply for having a hostile opinion, and I don't give squat. That's going to change.

I have grown tired of your interminably long posts and have decided to only scan the shorter ones. This place isn't where would-be novelists parade their writing styles, especially those who have poor writing abilities as you do.

[Innockcroff]

[QUOTE=markendsley;30878]Good lord man, do you really expect me to read the whole thing?

I disagree with you on Abortion. Infanticide is not an accurate term as Fetuses are not Infants. Fetuscide would be a more accurate word, although I just made it up, like the rest of you made up Infanticide (infanticide IS a word.. A baby is considered an infant between birth and 1 year of age.

So when women are marrying 1 day to 1 year old babies, then you can call it infanticide, until then no.(marrying babies???)

I'm sorry if this offends someone's sensibilities, but I see the Fetus as more of an organ of the Mother, reliant on her for function and continued life.

I don't think they should be thought of as people until they can sustain their lives, on their own, for any amount of time at all, as born babies do.

Does anyone here remember when you were a Fetus? I certainly don't,

I don't remember anything about my first year of life. Should everyone who can't remember being born be killed?

and while I don't believe in killing life, we do it to animals all the time. Sometimes killing surplus subhuman matter is practical.

In the case of mud races, I agree emphatically.

To me this is a catch 22 to republicans, is that they complain all night long about people on welfare, yet they say that if you are on welfare, and you get pregnant, you must have another child, another person on welfare. The obvious point that a Republican would make, is don't get pregnant, but if someone is on welfare in the first place generally, they are too stupid to not get pregnant.

Not necessarily, most know how to prevent it but want more babies to get more welfare and man their army for the coming race war.

So if someone is anti abortion, and anti welfare, which many are, then you actually support adding more people to the welfare dole, when the alternative is abortion happening.

The best alternative is not paying them with welfare.

[intendepods]

By that logic sperm and egg are infants too, because they will eventually form a person. You say a baby is a baby, yet you don't seem to know the medical definition of the word "baby".

You are not a man, because you choose to empathize with an unborn child, while I empathize with real talking breathing people.

Sperm and eggs aren't human until they form a fetus, but when they do, they are human life from the moment they merge. I can imagine you have murdered much sperm in your life by jerking off.

[Bejemoelemymn]

[QUOTE=The Man Myth Legend;31082]

Good lord man, do you really expect me to read the whole thing?

I disagree with you on Abortion. Infanticide is not an accurate term as Fetuses are not Infants. Fetuscide would be a more accurate word, although I just made it up, like the rest of you made up Infanticide (infanticide IS a word.. A baby is considered an infant between birth and 1 year of age.

So when women are marrying 1 day to 1 year old babies, then you can call it infanticide, until then no.(marrying babies???)

I'm sorry if this offends someone's sensibilities, but I see the Fetus as more of an organ of the Mother, reliant on her for function and continued life.

I don't think they should be thought of as people until they can sustain their lives, on their own, for any amount of time at all, as born babies do.

Does anyone here remember when you were a Fetus? I certainly don't,

I don't remember anything about my first year of life. Should everyone who can't remember being born be killed?

and while I don't believe in killing life, we do it to animals all the time. Sometimes killing surplus subhuman matter is practical.

In the case of mud races, I agree emphatically.

To me this is a catch 22 to republicans, is that they complain all night long about people on welfare, yet they say that if you are on welfare, and you get pregnant, you must have another child, another person on welfare. The obvious point that a Republican would make, is don't get pregnant, but if someone is on welfare in the first place generally, they are too stupid to not get pregnant.

Not necessarily, most know how to prevent it but want more babies to get more welfare and man their army for the coming race war.

So if someone is anti abortion, and anti welfare, which many are, then you actually support adding more people to the welfare dole, when the alternative is abortion happening.

The best alternative is not paying them with welfare.

Exactly, there shouldn't be a financial incentive to have children, or cap it at one, after that you're SOL.

[rvadipoldkov]

[QUOTE=Booyaz;31084]

Exactly, there shouldn't be a financial incentive to have children, or cap it at one, after that you're SOL.

As George Wallace once said: "No, not one."

[sciectotacype17]

I agree that morally there isn't a whole lot of difference between killing a fetus, and killing a born baby, but Practically, there is a HUGE difference.

Trying to keep every baby from accidental pregnancies is simply not practical.

So by your logic of the heart beating means it's sacred, does that mean we can't kill animals, they have beating hearts. Between a fetus and a dog, both have beating hearts, and are not really people.
If you say we can't kill unborn fetuses, then I suggest we draw one clear line. If it has a heart, it beats, and you kill it, you are a murderer. Practically this makes no sense, but it appears to be the way you look at it.

How did animals get into a post about humans? Animals are killed every hour of every day with impunity. Your argument is specious.

[lorrieholdridge]

I don't need some CRACKPOT like Jim Profit telling me how to live my life. It's clear to me that he is incapable of so much as one lucid thought, therefore I will leave him to his own nonsensical blather.

Good idea, everyone should ignore the pitiful little boy.

[Clolmemaexata]

the very 1st thing the little zygot (zygote) does after the sperm cracks the egg is attach itself to the womb wall and starts to feed.

It does this because it wants to live.

Killing it is murder.

do not be stupid.


jews love killing our babies in the womb.

Another reason there are so many Jewish gynecologists.

[MartZubok]

Another reason there are so many Jewish gynecologists.

Along with the reason those kike OBGYNs get to see and handle plenty of goyim pussy.

[downtowndude]

Sperm and eggs aren't human until they form a fetus, but when they do, they are human life from the moment they merge. I can imagine you have murdered much sperm in your life by jerking off.

That is just your definition of the process, no one knows for sure.