LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-25-2010, 09:03 AM   #1
womberte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default Men and women are not equal under the law... awesome!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment



This ammendment never passed. That means legally, we can pass any state law we want against women. I propose we start with women can't have an abortion without several men's permission. Roe is an unconstitutional piece of crap. Where in the constitution does it say you have a right to privacy?

You have a right to not being searched without a warrant, but that's not privacy. If it were, every single company would be under investigation for taking our information. Facebook would be considered public enemy number one. So Roe is not a real ammendment, this is the argument the Christian right (JESSEJACKSON...) should be arguing.

More importantly, because this isn't an ammendment either. It means women's "privacy", is abstract anyway. We're not taking away their anonyminity, just their ability to do something because we don't have to be equal under the law. It doesn't stop women from voting. That unfourtanately, IS an ammendment. But it's high time we actually started taking the constitution seriously. Especially you lawlbertarians. If you're going to talk about it every God-damn second... do something with it!

Because of this law, women don't have to receive equal pay, take advantage of that too. (JHOFFA_X...)

Women could be punished more under a crime just because they have a vagina. A judge doesn't have to appalogize for being partial to a specific gender, only the jury.



I say this because women are the leading contributer to faggots in the country. Cutout femenism, you cutout faggots. It's simple logic really. Before femenism, men like Clint Eastwood and Bruce Lee were everywhere. Then they fagged up this country and now we're all Jonas Brothers and ****** Cullen.

Therefore if we eradicate women, we will eradicate homosexuals. I havn't seen lala around lately, a perfect example of how women cannot handle situations. They rely on the compliance and praise of men. lala never made her own arguments, she just saddled on Nazimick's back. This is how most women act, and therefore we are in the right to shun and discriminate against them. Atleast untill they pick up the slack and join the fight against gays the way negros and hispanics have.

barbarossaaaa is going to be so proud of me.
womberte is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 02:04 PM   #2
bubbachew14

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
You are an idiot.
bubbachew14 is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 03:43 PM   #3
TOD4wDTQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
You are an idiot.
Yes, he is a flaming idiot, as well as a faggot-polesmoker.
TOD4wDTQ is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 04:49 PM   #4
opdirorg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
You are an idiot.
Just keep burning your bridges mr. "moderate".
opdirorg is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 08:25 PM   #5
QuidQuoPro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment



This ammendment never passed. That means legally, we can pass any state law we want against women. I propose we start with women can't have an abortion without several men's permission. Roe is an unconstitutional piece of crap. Where in the constitution does it say you have a right to privacy?

You have a right to not being searched without a warrant, but that's not privacy. If it were, every single company would be under investigation for taking our information. Facebook would be considered public enemy number one. So Roe is not a real ammendment, this is the argument the Christian right (JESSEJACKSON...) should be arguing.

More importantly, because this isn't an ammendment either. It means women's "privacy", is abstract anyway. We're not taking away their anonyminity, just their ability to do something because we don't have to be equal under the law. It doesn't stop women from voting. That unfourtanately, IS an ammendment. But it's high time we actually started taking the constitution seriously. Especially you lawlbertarians. If you're going to talk about it every God-damn second... do something with it!

Because of this law, women don't have to receive equal pay, take advantage of that too. (JHOFFA_X...)

Women could be punished more under a crime just because they have a vagina. A judge doesn't have to appalogize for being partial to a specific gender, only the jury.



I say this because women are the leading contributer to faggots in the country. Cutout femenism, you cutout faggots. It's simple logic really. Before femenism, men like Clint Eastwood and Bruce Lee were everywhere. Then they fagged up this country and now we're all Jonas Brothers and ****** Cullen.

Therefore if we eradicate women, we will eradicate homosexuals. I havn't seen lala around lately, a perfect example of how women cannot handle situations. They rely on the compliance and praise of men. lala never made her own arguments, she just saddled on Nazimick's back. This is how most women act, and therefore we are in the right to shun and discriminate against them. Atleast untill they pick up the slack and join the fight against gays the way negros and hispanics have.

barbarossaaaa is going to be so proud of me.
As soon as you learn to spell and make sensible posts, someone might take you seriously, dunce boy, but as it stands now, you are the forum buffoon!
QuidQuoPro is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 08:26 PM   #6
Roxanjbra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Just keep burning your bridges mr. "moderate".
Are you able to decipher (explain) what that means? Didn't think so.
Roxanjbra is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 08:38 PM   #7
interznakinfo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
without women you men would be fucking each other or tree stumps or pies right out of oven ya moron.......
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment



This ammendment never passed. That means legally, we can pass any state law we want against women. I propose we start with women can't have an abortion without several men's permission. Roe is an unconstitutional piece of crap. Where in the constitution does it say you have a right to privacy?

You have a right to not being searched without a warrant, but that's not privacy. If it were, every single company would be under investigation for taking our information. Facebook would be considered public enemy number one. So Roe is not a real ammendment, this is the argument the Christian right (JESSEJACKSON...) should be arguing.

More importantly, because this isn't an ammendment either. It means women's "privacy", is abstract anyway. We're not taking away their anonyminity, just their ability to do something because we don't have to be equal under the law. It doesn't stop women from voting. That unfourtanately, IS an ammendment. But it's high time we actually started taking the constitution seriously. Especially you lawlbertarians. If you're going to talk about it every God-damn second... do something with it!

Because of this law, women don't have to receive equal pay, take advantage of that too. (JHOFFA_X...)

Women could be punished more under a crime just because they have a vagina. A judge doesn't have to appalogize for being partial to a specific gender, only the jury.



I say this because women are the leading contributer to faggots in the country. Cutout femenism, you cutout faggots. It's simple logic really. Before femenism, men like Clint Eastwood and Bruce Lee were everywhere. Then they fagged up this country and now we're all Jonas Brothers and ****** Cullen.

Therefore if we eradicate women, we will eradicate homosexuals. I havn't seen lala around lately, a perfect example of how women cannot handle situations. They rely on the compliance and praise of men. lala never made her own arguments, she just saddled on Nazimick's back. This is how most women act, and therefore we are in the right to shun and discriminate against them. Atleast untill they pick up the slack and join the fight against gays the way negros and hispanics have.

barbarossaaaa is going to be so proud of me.
interznakinfo is offline


Old 10-25-2010, 08:43 PM   #8
selayeffethy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
I think moral men and moral woman are equal....

I only view progressives as being not equal to "us."

Woman are superior to men in somethings and men are superior to woman in others, however the balance is even between the two..

^ of course thats in a structured society, however if we revert back to "cave man days" in the event of a catastrophe, men will be superior to woman but BOTH are definitely useful of course..
selayeffethy is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 12:32 AM   #9
Peretool

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Jim, I think going against you proves that I'm moderate more than anything else.
Peretool is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 01:07 AM   #10
jenilopaz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Hey Jim
GO FUCK YOURSELF!
jenilopaz is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 01:13 AM   #11
Reocourgigiot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
How can one who loves his spouse love her and not see her as equal...
Reocourgigiot is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 01:17 AM   #12
Lgcjqxlw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
How can one who loves his spouse love her and not see her as equal...
Agreed.
Lgcjqxlw is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 01:40 AM   #13
w3QHxwNb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Men aren't equal to women PERIOD.. Not to say that's a bad thing, but it is the nature of things.

This really bothers some women. IMO, it's too bad.

There are roles that women simply shouldn't be in.. I mean, ask yourself: If someone is going into a burning building after your son or daughter... Do you want it to be a great big guy, or a chick?

Come on.. We're kidding ourselves with this nonsense that everybody is exactly the same.

We're not, and that's fine.
w3QHxwNb is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 08:55 AM   #14
bgsavings

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
How can one who loves his spouse love her and not see her as equal...
Couldn't you see yourself seeing a negro as an equal in theory?

I just think geneitcally women are infirior. That's like saying a retard can't go on to live a fulfilling life and play a beautiful orchastry. It's possible, just unlikely. No... if anything, my opinion of women as a whole makes me appreciate my wife all the more. As when I say she's different from other women, I actually mean it.

This is not to say I don't think men can't be bad. But as a general rule, women are far worse then men, and fags are worse then women. But then... who's ussually a fag? Women. It all goes hand in hand.
bgsavings is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 09:19 AM   #15
jhfsdhf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
Couldn't you see yourself seeing a negro as an equal in theory?

I just think geneitcally women are infirior. That's like saying a retard can't go on to live a fulfilling life and play a beautiful orchastry. It's possible, just unlikely. No... if anything, my opinion of women as a whole makes me appreciate my wife all the more. As when I say she's different from other women, I actually mean it.

This is not to say I don't think men can't be bad. But as a general rule, women are far worse then men, and fags are worse then women. But then... who's ussually a fag? Women. It all goes hand in hand.
I will destroy you......

yeah i broke the "sacred" rules,,,,,
jhfsdhf is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 09:47 AM   #16
girlsround

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Couldn't you see yourself seeing a negro as an equal in theory?

I just think geneitcally women are infirior. That's like saying a retard can't go on to live a fulfilling life and play a beautiful orchastry. It's possible, just unlikely. No... if anything, my opinion of women as a whole makes me appreciate my wife all the more. As when I say she's different from other women, I actually mean it.

This is not to say I don't think men can't be bad. But as a general rule, women are far worse then men, and fags are worse then women. But then... who's ussually a fag? Women. It all goes hand in hand.
All I can say is I certainly feel sorry for your wife.
You are a raving lunatic!
girlsround is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 02:38 PM   #17
Maymayfor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
I think Men are generally better at digging ditches, Women are better at leading, and making family decisions, oh yeah and at having children. Both Genders have strengths and weaknesses, but all in all they are more similar than any other forms of life.
Maymayfor is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 03:07 PM   #18
Hinigyday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
of course they arent. its a silly thread made by a sillyassed man. i am NOT one of them pro-women woman. there are aklot of differences between the sexes, and women are the weaker sex. doesn't mean we cant kick a few men's asses, or roof a roof better, or put a piece of furniture together better or change our oil faster. it just means we are SEPERATE AND UNEQUAL. hell, i dont wanna be equals. THANKFULLY.in a relationship, it SHOULD be equal. a compromise.
Men aren't equal to women PERIOD.. Not to say that's a bad thing, but it is the nature of things.

This really bothers some women. IMO, it's too bad.

There are roles that women simply shouldn't be in.. I mean, ask yourself: If someone is going into a burning building after your son or daughter... Do you want it to be a great big guy, or a chick?

Come on.. We're kidding ourselves with this nonsense that everybody is exactly the same.

We're not, and that's fine.
Hinigyday is offline


Old 10-27-2010, 05:14 AM   #19
VitaliyMurnov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
How can one who loves his spouse love her and not see her as equal...
The same way one can love his dog but see that it is not his equal.
VitaliyMurnov is offline


Old 10-27-2010, 05:18 AM   #20
JessePex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
618
Senior Member
Default
Couldn't you see yourself seeing a negro as an equal in theory?

I just think geneitcally women are infirior. That's like saying a retard can't go on to live a fulfilling life and play a beautiful orchastry. It's possible, just unlikely. No... if anything, my opinion of women as a whole makes me appreciate my wife all the more. As when I say she's different from other women, I actually mean it.

This is not to say I don't think men can't be bad. But as a general rule, women are far worse then men, and fags are worse then women. But then... who's ussually a fag? Women. It all goes hand in hand.
Your "wife" is a homosexual, transexual, butt-fucker, and you need to learn to spell before you try to run with the big dogs, Sister.
JessePex is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity