Socialists trying to impeach Justice Roberts; to stack the panel with socialists - Page 2 - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**cakaeroryrere** · 10-25-2010, 05:03 AM

Jessie, all I have to say is that if you can do something about it, please do. I am getting awfully sick of this shit. The amount of money I have invested in this place through my taxes, and yet it is a system made to fuck me.

I know I sound demoralizing, but I really do believe it's that bad. It has gotten to where your vote means nothing, because you are choosing between Lose and Lose. Regardless of who takes office, Government continues to be run by the same people.

Our Government has broken the moral point long long ago. When they began fleecing America, they were way past it.

When people say Obama is a Marxist / Socialist, I think they give him too much credit. I compare him, and the rest of the ruling class, to something that more closely resembles a dictatorship, set up to fund some Swiss bank accounts.

Sic semper tyrannis

**Qwjyrgij** · 10-25-2010, 05:04 AM

did it work?

**XzBZB2UV** · 10-25-2010, 05:05 AM

Roberts is not a democratically nominated person.

Regardless, all 9 of them are part of the 545 which are the problem.

**doolarsva** · 10-25-2010, 05:07 AM

Roberts is not a directly, democratically nominated person.

He is nominated by the President, who is nominated by the people. He is also confirmed by people nominated by the people.

**Idorsearogele** · 10-25-2010, 05:09 AM

Roberts is not a directly, democratically nominated person.

He is nominated by the President, who is nominated by the people. He is also confirmed by people nominated by the people.

No, he is confirmed by representatives who serve 6 year terms.

**himecthekWiff** · 10-25-2010, 05:10 AM

who are also democratically nominated and voted for (if you consider our running laws to be democratic).

**BarBoss** · 10-25-2010, 05:10 AM

Regardless, all 9 of them are part of the 545 which are the problem.

appointed for life by presidents elected democratically, in this case Bush I, I believe.....

The have the final say in who or what is "democratically constitutional "

They're more powerful than congress and they're NOT elected.

**capeAngedlelp** · 10-25-2010, 05:12 AM

appointed for life by presidents elected democratically, in this case Bush I, I believe.....
"
The have the final say in who or what is "democratically constitutional "

Yeah, and that's a problem in my view.

Speaking of problems, all of ours can be laid at the feet of:

435 People in the House
100 In the Senate
9 on the Supreme Court

and 1 President.

545 people.

**intifatry** · 10-25-2010, 05:14 AM

Anyone else who failed as spectacularly as our representatives have would be fired.

But they write the rules.. And they stuck us with a revolving door between abusive relationships.

**Texdolley** · 10-25-2010, 05:16 AM

congress can pass any law and the supreme court can uphold it IF its challenged..

Get a liberal in there and they WILL take our guns and right now they WILL uphold obamycare, which was ruled that Americans can sue on the basis of "corporatism."

**AricGoffgog** · 10-25-2010, 05:18 AM

Conservatives aren't any better though. What we really need is Libertarians.

**hauptdaunnila** · 10-25-2010, 05:18 AM

I'm not saying there are worse choices than Roberts.. I'm saying they all deserve to be sent packing and that the SC has too much power.

I mean, when 9 guys who aren't accountable to anyone get to overrule congress, there's a problem.

**chinesemedicine** · 10-25-2010, 05:23 AM

the supreme court judges what the congress passes

**temansertewek** · 10-25-2010, 05:25 AM

so pad the supreme court with tyrannical justices - as Obama has done....

**ultimda horaf** · 10-25-2010, 05:25 AM

Congress can then pass ANYTHING it wants...

**chechokancho** · 10-25-2010, 05:26 AM

It becomes law of the land then.....

**Scukonahuy** · 10-25-2010, 05:27 AM

Congress can then pass ANYTHING it wants...

They practically can now..

I hate the lot of them.

All 545..

Still, stacking it with liberals can only make things worse.

**JonnLeejsp** · 10-25-2010, 05:29 AM

our supreme courts purpose is to "interpret" our constitution.

**koebforfrn** · 10-25-2010, 05:30 AM

They practically can now..

I hate the lot of them.

All 545..

Still, stacking it with liberals can only make things worse.

It can and it does, but at the same time they have to answer to a conservative supreme court.....

**Fiipolera** · 10-25-2010, 05:32 AM

All our problems as a society revolve around the 14th amendment......

IT NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED NOW....

10-25-2010, 05:03 AM	#21
cakaeroryrere Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 413 Senior Member	Jessie, all I have to say is that if you can do something about it, please do. I am getting awfully sick of this shit. The amount of money I have invested in this place through my taxes, and yet it is a system made to fuck me. I know I sound demoralizing, but I really do believe it's that bad. It has gotten to where your vote means nothing, because you are choosing between Lose and Lose. Regardless of who takes office, Government continues to be run by the same people. Our Government has broken the moral point long long ago. When they began fleecing America, they were way past it. When people say Obama is a Marxist / Socialist, I think they give him too much credit. I compare him, and the rest of the ruling class, to something that more closely resembles a dictatorship, set up to fund some Swiss bank accounts. Sic semper tyrannis Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:04 AM	#22
Qwjyrgij Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 388 Senior Member	did it work? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:05 AM	#23
XzBZB2UV Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 420 Senior Member	Roberts is not a democratically nominated person. Regardless, all 9 of them are part of the 545 which are the problem. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:07 AM	#24
doolarsva Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	Roberts is not a directly, democratically nominated person. He is nominated by the President, who is nominated by the people. He is also confirmed by people nominated by the people. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:09 AM	#25
Idorsearogele Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	Roberts is not a directly, democratically nominated person. He is nominated by the President, who is nominated by the people. He is also confirmed by people nominated by the people. No, he is confirmed by representatives who serve 6 year terms. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:10 AM	#26
himecthekWiff Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 374 Senior Member	who are also democratically nominated and voted for (if you consider our running laws to be democratic). Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:10 AM	#27
BarBoss Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 577 Senior Member	Regardless, all 9 of them are part of the 545 which are the problem. appointed for life by presidents elected democratically, in this case Bush I, I believe..... The have the final say in who or what is "democratically constitutional " They're more powerful than congress and they're NOT elected. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:12 AM	#28
capeAngedlelp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	appointed for life by presidents elected democratically, in this case Bush I, I believe..... " The have the final say in who or what is "democratically constitutional " Yeah, and that's a problem in my view. Speaking of problems, all of ours can be laid at the feet of: 435 People in the House 100 In the Senate 9 on the Supreme Court and 1 President. 545 people. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:14 AM	#29
intifatry Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 413 Senior Member	Anyone else who failed as spectacularly as our representatives have would be fired. But they write the rules.. And they stuck us with a revolving door between abusive relationships. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:16 AM	#30
Texdolley Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 524 Senior Member	congress can pass any law and the supreme court can uphold it IF its challenged.. Get a liberal in there and they WILL take our guns and right now they WILL uphold obamycare, which was ruled that Americans can sue on the basis of "corporatism." Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:18 AM	#31
AricGoffgog Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 445 Senior Member	Conservatives aren't any better though. What we really need is Libertarians. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:18 AM	#32
hauptdaunnila Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 534 Senior Member	I'm not saying there are worse choices than Roberts.. I'm saying they all deserve to be sent packing and that the SC has too much power. I mean, when 9 guys who aren't accountable to anyone get to overrule congress, there's a problem. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:23 AM	#33
chinesemedicine Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 506 Senior Member	the supreme court judges what the congress passes Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:25 AM	#34
temansertewek Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 452 Senior Member	so pad the supreme court with tyrannical justices - as Obama has done.... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:25 AM	#35
ultimda horaf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	Congress can then pass ANYTHING it wants... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

10-25-2010, 05:26 AM	#36
chechokancho Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 465 Senior Member	It becomes law of the land then..... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:27 AM	#37
Scukonahuy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 401 Senior Member	Congress can then pass ANYTHING it wants... They practically can now.. I hate the lot of them. All 545.. Still, stacking it with liberals can only make things worse. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:29 AM	#38
JonnLeejsp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 407 Senior Member	our supreme courts purpose is to "interpret" our constitution. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:30 AM	#39
koebforfrn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	They practically can now.. I hate the lot of them. All 545.. Still, stacking it with liberals can only make things worse. It can and it does, but at the same time they have to answer to a conservative supreme court..... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2010, 05:32 AM	#40
Fiipolera Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	All our problems as a society revolve around the 14th amendment...... IT NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED NOW.... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote